Infection Control Unit, Brest Teaching Hospital, Brest, France.
Department of Microbiology, Brest Teaching Hospital, Brest, France.
Endoscopy. 2016 Aug;48(8):704-10. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-107591. Epub 2016 May 20.
Infectious outbreaks associated with the use of gastrointestinal endoscopes have increased in line with the spread of highly resistant bacteria. The aim of this study was to determine the measures required to improve microbial quality surveillance of gastrointestinal endoscopes.
We reviewed the results of all microbiological surveillance testing of gastrointestinal endoscopes and automatic endoscope reprocessors (AERs) performed at Brest Teaching Hospital from 1 January 2008 to 1 June 2015. We analyzed the influence of the time of incubation on the rate of positive results using the Kaplan - Meier method. We also studied risk factors for gastrointestinal endoscope contamination using a multivariable logistic regression model.
Over the study period, 1100 microbiological tests of gastrointestinal endoscopes (n = 762) and AERs (n = 338) were performed. A total of 264 endoscope tests (34.6 %) showed a level of contamination higher than the target. After 2 days of incubation, contamination was apparent in only 55.5 % of the endoscopes that were later shown to be contaminated (95 % confidence interval [CI] 49.2 - 61.8). Multivariable analysis showed that the use of storage cabinets for heat-sensitive endoscopes significantly reduced the risk of endoscope contamination (odds ratio [OR] 0.23, 95 %CI 0.09 - 0.54; P < 0.001) and that the use of endoscopes older than 4 years significantly increased this risk (OR ≥ 6 vs. < 2 years 2.92, 95 %CI 1.63 - 5.24; P < 0.001).
Microbiological culture technique, mainly incubation duration, strongly influenced the results of endoscope sampling. Samples should be cultured for more than 2 days to improve the detection of contaminated endoscopes. Particular attention should be paid to endoscopes older than 2 years and to those that are not stored in storage cabinets for heat-sensitive endoscopes.
随着高耐药菌的传播,与使用胃肠内窥镜相关的感染爆发有所增加。本研究旨在确定提高胃肠内窥镜微生物质量监测所需的措施。
我们回顾了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2015 年 6 月 1 日布雷斯特教学医院进行的所有胃肠内窥镜和自动内镜再处理机(AER)微生物监测检测的结果。我们使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法分析孵育时间对阳性结果率的影响。我们还使用多变量逻辑回归模型研究了胃肠内窥镜污染的危险因素。
在研究期间,共进行了 1100 次胃肠内窥镜(n=762)和 AER(n=338)微生物检测。共有 264 次内窥镜检测(34.6%)显示污染水平高于目标。孵育 2 天后,后来被污染的内窥镜中只有 55.5%显示出污染(95%置信区间[CI]49.2%-61.8%)。多变量分析表明,使用热敏感型内窥镜储存柜可显著降低内窥镜污染的风险(比值比[OR]0.23,95%CI 0.09-0.54;P<0.001),而使用超过 4 年的内窥镜则显著增加了这种风险(OR≥6 年与<2 年相比 2.92,95%CI 1.63-5.24;P<0.001)。
微生物培养技术,主要是孵育时间,强烈影响内窥镜取样结果。为了提高污染内窥镜的检出率,样品应培养超过 2 天。应特别注意使用超过 2 年的内窥镜和未存放在热敏感型内窥镜储存柜中的内窥镜。