McKechnie Andrew E, Whitfield Maxine C, Smit Ben, Gerson Alexander R, Smith Eric Krabbe, Talbot William A, McWhorter Todd J, Wolf Blair O
DST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa
DST-NRF Centre of Excellence at the Percy FitzPatrick Institute, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of Pretoria, Private Bag X20, Hatfield 0028, South Africa.
J Exp Biol. 2016 Jul 15;219(Pt 14):2145-55. doi: 10.1242/jeb.138776. Epub 2016 May 19.
Birds show phylogenetic variation in the relative importance of respiratory versus cutaneous evaporation, but the consequences for heat tolerance and evaporative cooling capacity remain unclear. We measured evaporative water loss (EWL), resting metabolic rate (RMR) and body temperature (Tb) in four arid-zone columbids from southern Africa [Namaqua dove (Oena capensis, ∼37 g), laughing dove (Spilopelia senegalensis, ∼89 g) and Cape turtle dove (Streptopelia capicola, ∼148 g)] and Australia [crested pigeon (Ocyphaps lophotes), ∼186 g] at air temperatures (Ta) of up to 62°C. There was no clear relationship between body mass and maximum Ta tolerated during acute heat exposure. Maximum Tb at very high Ta was 43.1±1.0, 43.7±0.8, 44.7±0.3 and 44.3±0.8°C in Namaqua doves, laughing doves, Cape turtle doves and crested pigeons, respectively. In all four species, RMR increased significantly at Ta above thermoneutrality, but the increases were relatively modest with RMR at Ta=56°C being 32, 60, 99 and 11% higher, respectively, than at Ta=35°C. At the highest Ta values reached, evaporative heat loss was equivalent to 466, 227, 230 and 275% of metabolic heat production. The maximum ratio of evaporative heat loss to metabolic production observed in Namaqua doves, 4.66, exceeds by a substantial margin previous values reported for birds. Our results support the notion that cutaneous evaporation provides a highly efficient mechanism of heat dissipation and an enhanced ability to tolerate extremely high Ta.
鸟类在呼吸蒸发与皮肤蒸发的相对重要性方面表现出系统发育差异,但对耐热性和蒸发散热能力的影响仍不清楚。我们测量了来自非洲南部(纳马夸沙鸡鸠(Oena capensis,约37克)、斑笑鸽(Spilopelia senegalensis,约89克)和海角斑鸠(Streptopelia capicola,约148克))和澳大利亚(凤头鸠(Ocyphaps lophotes),约186克)的四种干旱地区鸽形目鸟类在高达62°C的气温(Ta)下的蒸发失水(EWL)、静息代谢率(RMR)和体温(Tb)。在急性热暴露期间,体重与耐受的最高Ta之间没有明显关系。在非常高的Ta下,纳马夸沙鸡鸠、斑笑鸽、海角斑鸠和凤头鸠的最高Tb分别为43.1±1.0、43.7±0.8、44.7±0.3和44.3±0.8°C。在所有这四个物种中,当Ta高于热中性温度时,RMR显著增加,但增加幅度相对较小,Ta = 56°C时的RMR分别比Ta = 35°C时高32%、60%、99%和11%。在达到的最高Ta值时,蒸发散热相当于代谢产热的466%、227%、230%和275%。在纳马夸沙鸡鸠中观察到的蒸发散热与代谢产热的最大比值为4.66,大大超过了此前报道的鸟类数值。我们的结果支持这样一种观点,即皮肤蒸发提供了一种高效的散热机制以及增强的耐受极高Ta的能力。