Bernelot Moens Sophie J, van der Valk Fleur M, Strang Aart C, Kroon Jeffrey, Smits Loek P, Kneepkens Eva L, Verberne Hein J, van Buul Jaap D, Nurmohamed Michael T, Stroes Erik S G
Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Room F4-211, PO Box 22660, Amsterdam, 1100 DD, The Netherlands.
Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Sanquin Research and Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2016 May 21;18(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1008-z.
Increasing numbers of patients (up to 40 %) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) achieve remission, yet it remains to be elucidated whether this also normalizes their cardiovascular risk. Short-term treatment with TNF inhibitors lowers arterial wall inflammation, but not to levels of healthy controls. We investigated whether RA patients in long-term remission are characterized by normalized inflammatory activity of the arterial wall and if this is dependent on type of medication used (TNF-inhibitor versus nonbiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs)).
Arterial wall inflammation, bone marrow and splenic activity (index of progenitor cell activity) was assessed with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose ((18)F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in RA patients in remission (disease activity score (DAS28) <2.6 for >6 months) and healthy controls. We performed ex vivo characterization of monocytes using flow cytometry and a transendothelial migration assay.
Overall, arterial wall inflammation was comparable in RA patients (n = 23) in long-term remission and controls (n = 17). However, RA subjects using current anti-TNF therapy (n = 13, disease activity score 1.98[1.8-2.2]) have an almost 1.2-fold higher (18)F-FDG uptake in the arterial wall compared to those using DMARDs (but with previous anti-TNF therapy) (n = 10, disease activity score 2.24[1.3-2.5]), which seemed to be predominantly explained by longer duration of their rheumatic disease in a multivariate linear regression analysis. This coincided with increased expression of pro-adhesive (CCR2) and migratory (CD11c, CD18) surface markers on monocytes and a concomitant increased migratory capacity. Finally, we found increased activity in bone marrow and spleen in RA patients using anti-TNF therapy compared to those with DMARDs and controls.
A subset of patients with RA in clinical remission have activated monocytes and increased inflammation in the arterial wall, despite the use of potent TNF blocking therapies. In these subjects, RA disease duration was the most important contributor to the level of arterial wall inflammation. This increased inflammatory state implies higher cardiovascular risk in these patients, who thus may require more stringent CV risk management.
越来越多的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者(高达40%)实现缓解,但他们的心血管风险是否也恢复正常仍有待阐明。肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)抑制剂的短期治疗可降低动脉壁炎症,但无法降至健康对照者的水平。我们调查了长期缓解的RA患者动脉壁炎症活性是否恢复正常,以及这是否取决于所用药物类型(TNF抑制剂与非生物改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARDs))。
采用(18)F-氟脱氧葡萄糖((18)F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET/CT)评估缓解期RA患者(疾病活动评分(DAS28)<2.6超过6个月)和健康对照者的动脉壁炎症、骨髓和脾脏活性(祖细胞活性指数)。我们使用流式细胞术和跨内皮迁移试验对单核细胞进行了体外特征分析。
总体而言,长期缓解的RA患者(n = 23)和对照者(n = 17)的动脉壁炎症相当。然而,与使用DMARDs(但既往使用过TNF治疗)的患者(n = 10,疾病活动评分为2.24[1.3 - 2.5])相比,目前使用抗TNF治疗的RA患者(n = 13,疾病活动评分为1.98[1.8 - 2.2])动脉壁的(18)F-FDG摄取几乎高1.2倍,在多变量线性回归分析中,这似乎主要由其风湿疾病的病程较长所解释。这与单核细胞上促黏附(CCR2)和迁移(CD11c、CD18)表面标志物的表达增加以及随之而来的迁移能力增强相一致。最后,我们发现与使用DMARDs的患者及对照者相比,使用抗TNF治疗的RA患者骨髓和脾脏活性增加。
尽管使用了有效的TNF阻断疗法,但临床缓解的部分RA患者仍有活化的单核细胞和动脉壁炎症增加。在这些患者中,RA病程是动脉壁炎症水平的最重要影响因素。这种炎症状态增加意味着这些患者心血管风险更高,因此可能需要更严格的心血管风险管理。