• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

陆军淋巴细胞免疫表型分析质量保证计划部

Department of Army lymphocyte immunophenotyping quality assurance program.

作者信息

Rickman W J, Waxdal M J, Monical C, Damato J D, Burke D S

机构信息

Division of Retrovirology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Rockville, Maryland 20850.

出版信息

Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1989 Jul;52(1):85-95. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(89)90195-5.

DOI:10.1016/0090-1229(89)90195-5
PMID:2721036
Abstract

With the emergence of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, lymphocyte immunophenotyping has become the single most important laboratory test for clinical management of HIV-infected subjects. To meet this challenge, the department of Army instituted a multicenter lymphocyte immunophenotyping quality assurance (QA) program in March 1986. An integral part of the QA program has been the development of a monthly proficiency testing program to survey the degree of precision and reproducibility of lymphocyte subset determinations within the Army. After 15 months of proficiency testing, the multicenter cumulative average standard deviation for the percentage of positive CD2 was 3.3, CD3 was 4.4, CD4 was 3.3, CD8 was 3.6, CD8CD3 was 2.8, CD19/20 was 2.9, and 3.0 for natural killer (NK) cells. The cumulative average coefficient of variation for the percentage of positive CD2 was 3.9%, CD3 was 4.9%, CD4 was 6.6%, CD8 was 11.4%, CD8CD3 was 9.4%, CD19/20 was 18.8%, and 26.5% for NK. Five survey shipments were also shipped to an additional 49 laboratories outside the Department of Army. The difference of the mean Army percentage positive values from the mean overall percentage positive values ranged from zero to 9.6, with an average difference of 1.6. The interlaboratory variability of flow cytometrically-derived percentage values presented in this report are almost half that cited by other multicenter lymphocyte comparative studies.

摘要

随着人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)疫情的出现,淋巴细胞免疫表型分析已成为HIV感染患者临床管理中最重要的单项实验室检测。为应对这一挑战,陆军部于1986年3月启动了一项多中心淋巴细胞免疫表型分析质量保证(QA)计划。QA计划的一个重要组成部分是制定每月能力验证计划,以调查陆军内部淋巴细胞亚群测定的精密度和可重复性程度。经过15个月的能力验证,多中心CD2阳性百分比的累积平均标准差为3.3,CD3为4.4,CD4为3.3,CD8为3.6,CD8CD3为2.8,CD19/20为2.9,自然杀伤(NK)细胞为3.0。CD2阳性百分比的累积平均变异系数为3.9%,CD3为4.9%,CD4为6.6%,CD8为11.4%,CD8CD3为9.4%,CD19/20为18.8%,NK为26.5%。另外还向陆军部以外的49个实验室发送了5批调查样本。陆军阳性百分比平均值与总体阳性百分比平均值的差异范围为0至9.6,平均差异为1.6。本报告中流式细胞仪得出的百分比值的实验室间变异性几乎是其他多中心淋巴细胞比较研究引用值的一半。

相似文献

1
Department of Army lymphocyte immunophenotyping quality assurance program.陆军淋巴细胞免疫表型分析质量保证计划部
Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1989 Jul;52(1):85-95. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(89)90195-5.
2
Evaluation of a dual-color flow cytometry immunophenotyping panel in a multicenter quality assurance program.多中心质量保证项目中双色流式细胞术免疫表型分析面板的评估
Cytometry. 1993;14(3):307-17. doi: 10.1002/cyto.990140311.
3
National external quality assessment scheme for lymphocyte immunophenotyping in Belgium.比利时淋巴细胞免疫表型分析国家外部质量评估计划。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2003 Mar;41(3):323-30. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2003.052.
4
[Evaluation of tests recommended by the CDC for the determination of CD4+ T lymphocytes in patients infected by the human immunodeficiency virus].[对美国疾病控制与预防中心推荐的用于测定人类免疫缺陷病毒感染患者CD4 + T淋巴细胞的检测方法的评估]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1994 Nov;42(9):830-5.
5
The Immunology Quality Assessment Proficiency Testing Program for CD3⁺4⁺ and CD3⁺8⁺ lymphocyte subsets: a ten year review via longitudinal mixed effects modeling.CD3⁺4⁺和 CD3⁺8⁺淋巴细胞亚群的免疫学质量评估能力验证计划:通过纵向混合效应模型的十年回顾。
J Immunol Methods. 2014 Jul;409:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2014.05.017. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
6
Improved precision in the enumeration of absolute numbers of lymphocyte phenotypes with long-term monthly proficiency testing.通过长期每月的能力验证提高淋巴细胞表型绝对数量计数的精度。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Mar 20;677:53-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1993.tb38764.x.
7
Quality control in the flow cytometric measurement of T-lymphocyte subsets: the multicenter AIDS cohort study experience. The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study Group.T淋巴细胞亚群流式细胞术测量中的质量控制:多中心艾滋病队列研究经验。多中心艾滋病队列研究组
Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1990 May;55(2):173-86. doi: 10.1016/0090-1229(90)90096-9.
8
Interlaboratory variability of CD8 subset measurements by flow cytometry and its applications to multicenter clinical trials. NAID/NICHD Women and Infants Transmission Study Group.流式细胞术检测 CD8 亚群的实验室间变异性及其在多中心临床试验中的应用。国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所妇女与婴儿传播研究组。
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995 Jul;2(4):462-8. doi: 10.1128/cdli.2.4.462-468.1995.
9
How many gated lymphocytes are needed for accurate assessment of T-subset percentages by flow cytometry?
Cytometry. 1996 Sep 15;26(3):223-6. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960915)26:3<223::AID-CYTO7>3.0.CO;2-F.
10
Analyses of quality assessment studies using CD45 for gating lymphocytes for CD3(+)4(+)%.使用CD45进行淋巴细胞门控以检测CD3(+)4(+)%的质量评估研究分析。
Cytometry. 2000 Feb 15;42(1):1-4. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(20000215)42:1<1::aid-cyto1>3.0.co;2-a.

引用本文的文献

1
A Critical Review on the Standardization and Quality Assessment of Nonfunctional Laboratory Tests Frequently Used to Identify Inborn Errors of Immunity.非功能性实验室检测在鉴定先天性免疫缺陷中的标准化和质量评估的批判性综述
Front Immunol. 2021 Nov 9;12:721289. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.721289. eCollection 2021.
2
Current practices in laboratory monitoring of HIV infection.目前 HIV 感染实验室监测的实践。
Indian J Med Res. 2011 Dec;134(6):801-22. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.92627.
3
Lymphocyte subpopulation reference ranges for monitoring human immunodeficiency virus-infected Chinese adults.
监测人类免疫缺陷病毒感染的中国成年人的淋巴细胞亚群参考范围。
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1996 May;3(3):326-30. doi: 10.1128/cdli.3.3.326-330.1996.
4
Interlaboratory variability of CD8 subset measurements by flow cytometry and its applications to multicenter clinical trials. NAID/NICHD Women and Infants Transmission Study Group.流式细胞术检测 CD8 亚群的实验室间变异性及其在多中心临床试验中的应用。国家儿童健康与人类发展研究所妇女与婴儿传播研究组。
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 1995 Jul;2(4):462-8. doi: 10.1128/cdli.2.4.462-468.1995.