Loturco Irineu, Pereira Lucas Adriano, Abad Cesar Cavinato Cal, Tabares Facundo, Moraes José Eduardo, Kobal Ronaldo, Kitamura Katia, Nakamura Fabio Yuzo
a NAR - Nucleus of High Performance in Sport , São Paulo , Brazil.
b Brazilian Rugby Confederation , São Paulo , Brazil.
J Sports Sci. 2017 Apr;35(8):734-741. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1186813. Epub 2016 May 21.
This study aimed at testing whether there are mean propulsive velocities (MPVs) capable of maximising the mean propulsive power (MPP) during the execution of bench press (BP), bench throw (BT), half squat (HS) and jump squat (JS). Additionally, we assessed the differences in MPP/MPV between ballistic and traditional exercises. Seventeen male rugby sevens players performed MPP tests in BP, BT, HS and JS and maximum isometric force (MIF) tests in HS and BP. The JS presented higher MPP (977.4 ± 156.2 W) than the HS (897.9 ± 157.7 W) (P < 0.05); the BP (743.4 ± 100.1 W) presented higher MPP than the BT (697.8 ± 70.4 W) (P < 0.05). Ballistic exercises presented higher optimum MPV (JS = 1.02 ± 0.07 m·s; BT = 1.67 ± 0.15 m·s) than traditional exercises (HS = 0.93 ± 0.08 m·s; BP = 1.40 ± 0.13 m·s) (P < 0.05). The optimum MPP in the JS, BT, HS and BP occurred at 28.2 ± 5.79, 23.3 ± 4.24, 32.4 ± 9.46 and 27.7 ± 5.33% of the MIF, respectively. The coefficient of variation (CV) of MPV at optimum MPP ranged from 7.4% to 9.7%, while the CV of %MIF ranged from 18.2% to 29.2%. The MPV is a more precise indicator of the optimum loads than the percentages of MIF due to its low inter-subject variability as expressed by CV. Therefore, MPV can be used to determine the optimum power load in the four investigated exercises.
本研究旨在测试在进行卧推(BP)、卧推投掷(BT)、半蹲(HS)和跳蹲(JS)时,是否存在能够使平均推进功率(MPP)最大化的平均推进速度(MPV)。此外,我们评估了弹道式练习和传统练习之间MPP/MPV的差异。17名男子七人制橄榄球运动员进行了BP、BT、HS和JS的MPP测试以及HS和BP的最大等长力量(MIF)测试。跳蹲的MPP(977.4±156.2瓦)高于半蹲(897.9±157.7瓦)(P<0.05);卧推(743.4±100.1瓦)的MPP高于卧推投掷(697.8±70.4瓦)(P<0.05)。弹道式练习的最佳MPV(跳蹲=1.02±0.07米·秒;卧推投掷=1.67±0.15米·秒)高于传统练习(半蹲=0.93±0.08米·秒;卧推=1.40±0.13米·秒)(P<0.05)。跳蹲、卧推投掷、半蹲和卧推的最佳MPP分别出现在MIF的28.2±5.79%、23.3±4.24%、32.4±9.46%和27.7±5.33%处。最佳MPP时MPV的变异系数(CV)在7.4%至9.7%之间,而%MIF的CV在18.2%至29.2%之间。由于CV所表示的受试者间变异性较低,MPV是比MIF百分比更精确的最佳负荷指标。因此,MPV可用于确定所研究的四项练习中的最佳功率负荷。