Loturco Irineu, Pereira Lucas A, Kobal Ronaldo, Zanetti Vinicius, Gil Saulo, Kitamura Katia, Abad Cesar Cavinato Cal, Nakamura Fabio Y
a Nucleus of High Performance in Sport , São Paulo , Brazil.
J Sports Sci. 2015;33(12):1283-92. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2015.1022574. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
The purpose of this study was to test which specific type of exercise (i.e., jump squat (JS) or half-squat (HS)) is more effective at maintaining speed and power abilities throughout a preseason in soccer players. Twenty-three male soccer players were randomly allocated into two groups: JS and HS. The mean propulsive power, vertical jumping ability, and sprinting performance were evaluated before and after 4 weeks of a preseason period. The optimum power loads for the JS and HS exercises were assessed and were used as load-references. The soccer players performed 10 power oriented training sessions in total. Both JS and HS maintained power in JS and speed abilities (P > 0.05, for main effects and interaction effect) as indicated by ANCOVA. Both groups demonstrated reduced power during HS (ES = -0.76 vs. -0.78, for JS and HS, respectively); both groups improved acceleration (ACC) from 5 to 10 m (ES = 0.52). JS was more effective at reducing the ACC decrements over 0-5 m (ES = -0.38 vs. -0.58, for JS and HS, respectively). The HS group increased squat jump height (ES = 0.76 vs. 0.11, for HS and JS, respectively). In summary, JS is more effective in reducing the ACC capacity over very short sprints while HS is more effective in improving squat jump performance. Both strategies improve ACC over longer distances. New training strategies should be implemented/developed to avoid concurrent training effects between power and endurance adaptations during professional soccer preseasons.
本研究的目的是测试哪种特定类型的运动(即跳蹲(JS)或半蹲(HS))在足球运动员的整个季前赛期间更有效地维持速度和力量能力。23名男性足球运动员被随机分为两组:JS组和HS组。在季前赛4周前后评估平均推进力、垂直跳跃能力和短跑成绩。评估了JS和HS运动的最佳力量负荷,并将其用作负荷参考。足球运动员总共进行了10次以力量为导向的训练课程。协方差分析表明,JS和HS在维持JS组的力量和速度能力方面均有效(主效应和交互效应的P>0.05)。两组在HS期间的力量均有所下降(JS组和HS组的效应量分别为-0.76和-0.78);两组在5至10米的加速(ACC)方面均有所改善(效应量=0.52)。在0至5米的距离上,JS在减少ACC下降方面更有效(JS组和HS组的效应量分别为-0.38和-0.58)。HS组的深蹲跳高度增加(HS组和JS组的效应量分别为0.76和0.11)。总之,JS在极短距离冲刺中减少ACC能力方面更有效,而HS在提高深蹲跳成绩方面更有效。两种策略在更长距离上都能改善ACC。应实施/开发新的训练策略,以避免职业足球季前赛期间力量和耐力适应之间的同时训练效应。