Lightbody Kirsty L, Davis Paul J, Austin Corrine J
Austin Davis Biologics, Great Addington, UK.
Vet Clin Pathol. 2016 Jun;45(2):335-46. doi: 10.1111/vcp.12364. Epub 2016 May 24.
Tapeworm infections pose a significant threat to equine health as they are associated with clinical cases of colic. Diagnosis of tapeworm burden using fecal egg counts (FECs) is unreliable, and, although a commercial serologic ELISA for anti-tapeworm antibodies is available, it requires a veterinarian to collect the blood sample. A reliable diagnostic test using an owner-accessible sample such as saliva could provide a cost-effective alternative for tapeworm testing in horses, and allow targeted deworming strategies.
The purpose of the study was to statistically validate a saliva tapeworm ELISA test and compare to a tapeworm-specific IgG(T) serologic ELISA.
Serum samples (139) and matched saliva samples (104) were collected from horses at a UK abattoir. The ileocecal junction and cecum were visually examined for tapeworms and any present were counted. Samples were analyzed using a serologic ELISA and the saliva tapeworm test. The test results were compared to tapeworm numbers and the various data sets were statistically analyzed.
Saliva scores had strong positive correlations with both infection intensity (0.74) and serologic results (Spearman's rank coefficients; 0.74 and 0.86, respectively). The saliva tapeworm test was capable of identifying the presence of one or more tapeworms with 83% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Importantly, no high-burden (more than 20 tapeworms) horses were misdiagnosed.
The saliva tapeworm test has statistical accuracy for detecting tapeworm burdens in horses with 83% sensitivity and 85% specificity, similar to those of the serologic ELISA (85% and 78%, respectively).
绦虫感染对马的健康构成重大威胁,因为它们与绞痛临床病例相关。使用粪便虫卵计数(FECs)诊断绦虫负荷并不可靠,而且,尽管有用于抗绦虫抗体的商业血清学ELISA,但它需要兽医采集血样。使用如唾液这种主人可自行获取的样本进行可靠的诊断测试,可为马的绦虫检测提供一种经济有效的替代方法,并允许采用有针对性的驱虫策略。
本研究的目的是对唾液绦虫ELISA测试进行统计学验证,并与绦虫特异性IgG(T)血清学ELISA进行比较。
从英国一家屠宰场的马身上采集了139份血清样本和104份匹配的唾液样本。对回盲交界处和盲肠进行肉眼检查以寻找绦虫,并对发现的任何绦虫进行计数。使用血清学ELISA和唾液绦虫测试对样本进行分析。将测试结果与绦虫数量进行比较,并对各种数据集进行统计学分析。
唾液评分与感染强度(0.74)和血清学结果(Spearman等级系数;分别为0.74和0.86)均呈强正相关。唾液绦虫测试能够以83%的灵敏度和85%的特异性识别一条或多条绦虫的存在。重要的是,没有高负荷(超过20条绦虫)的马被误诊。
唾液绦虫测试在检测马的绦虫负荷方面具有统计学准确性,灵敏度为83%,特异性为85%,与血清学ELISA(分别为85%和78%)相似。