Stincic Todd, Smith Robert G, Taylor W Rowland
Department of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
J Physiol. 2016 Oct 1;594(19):5685-94. doi: 10.1113/JP272384. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
Direction selectivity has been widely studied as an example of a complex neural computation. Directional GABA release from starburst amacrine cells (SBACs) is critical for generating directional signals in direction-selective ganglion cells. The mechanisms producing the directional release remain unclear. For SBACs, ordered distribution of sustained and transient bipolar cell inputs along the dendrites is proposed to generate directional GABA release. This study tests whether this hypothesis applies to ON-type SBACs. EPSCs activated at proximal and distal dendritic locations have the same time course. Therefore, the ordered arrangement of inputs from bipolar cells with different kinetic properties cannot be responsible for generating directional GABA release from ON-type SBACs.
Direction selectivity in the retina relies critically on directionally asymmetric GABA release from the dendritic tips of starburst amacrine cells (SBACs). GABA release from each radially directed dendrite is larger for motion outward from the soma toward the dendritic tips than for motion inwards toward the soma. The biophysical mechanisms generating these directional signals remain controversial. A model based on electron-microscopic reconstructions of the mouse retina proposed that an ordered arrangement of kinetically distinct bipolar cell inputs to ON- and OFF-type SBACs could produce directional GABA release. We tested this prediction by measuring the time course of EPSCs in ON-type SBACs in the mouse retina, activated by proximal and distal light stimulation. Contrary to the prediction, the kinetics of the excitatory inputs were independent of dendritic location. Computer simulations based on 3D reconstructions of SBAC dendrites demonstrated that the response kinetics of distal inputs were not significantly altered by dendritic filtering. These direct physiological measurements, do not support the hypothesis that directional signals in SBACs arise from the ordered arrangement of kinetically distinct bipolar cell inputs.
方向选择性作为一种复杂神经计算的示例已得到广泛研究。来自星爆无长突细胞(SBACs)的定向γ-氨基丁酸(GABA)释放对于在方向选择性神经节细胞中产生定向信号至关重要。产生定向释放的机制尚不清楚。对于SBACs,有人提出持续和瞬态双极细胞输入沿树突的有序分布会产生定向GABA释放。本研究测试该假设是否适用于ON型SBACs。在近端和远端树突位置激活的兴奋性突触后电流(EPSCs)具有相同的时间进程。因此,具有不同动力学特性的双极细胞输入的有序排列不能负责从ON型SBACs产生定向GABA释放。
视网膜中的方向选择性关键依赖于从星爆无长突细胞(SBACs)树突尖端的方向不对称GABA释放。对于从胞体向外朝向树突尖端的运动,每个径向树突的GABA释放量大于朝向胞体向内的运动。产生这些定向信号的生物物理机制仍存在争议。基于小鼠视网膜电子显微镜重建的一个模型提出,向ON型和OFF型SBACs输入的动力学不同的双极细胞的有序排列可产生定向GABA释放。我们通过测量小鼠视网膜中ON型SBACs中由近端和远端光刺激激活的EPSCs的时间进程来测试这一预测。与预测相反,兴奋性输入的动力学与树突位置无关。基于SBAC树突三维重建的计算机模拟表明,远端输入的反应动力学不会因树突滤波而显著改变。这些直接的生理学测量不支持SBACs中的定向信号源自动力学不同的双极细胞输入的有序排列这一假设。