• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种与利益相关者共同界定生态系统服务范围的协作方法:以阿拉比达自然公园为例。

A Collaborative Approach for Scoping Ecosystem Services with Stakeholders: The Case of Arrábida Natural Park.

作者信息

Lopes Rita, Videira Nuno

机构信息

CENSE - Center for Environmental and Sustainability Research, Departamento de Ciências e Engenharia do Ambiente, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 2829-516, Caparica, Portugal.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2016 Aug;58(2):323-42. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0711-5. Epub 2016 May 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-016-0711-5
PMID:27220337
Abstract

This paper presents an innovative approach for conducting collaborative scoping processes aiming to elicit multiple values of ecosystem services. The proposed methodology rests on three steps combining different participatory tools that promote a comprehensive examination of the perceptions hold by relevant stakeholder groups. The first step consists of an institutional and stakeholder analysis developed in the study area. The second includes a participatory workshop, where a sequence of scoping exercises is conducted with the active collaboration of the invited stakeholders. The final step aims to validate scoping results and develop dependency networks between organizations and the identified ecosystem services. The approach was tested in the Arrábida Natural Park, a marine and coastal protected area in Portugal. Invited participants were able to identify an extensive list of ecosystem services in the natural area, establish linkages between those services and human wellbeing, identify drivers of change and perform a preliminary screening of the associated ecological, social, and economic values. The case study evaluation provided positive feedback on the usefulness of the approach, which advances the existing set of methods for participatory identification of ecosystem services and sets the scene for involvement of stakeholder groups in assessment and management processes.

摘要

本文提出了一种创新方法,用于开展协作式范围界定过程,旨在引出生态系统服务的多种价值。所提出的方法基于三个步骤,结合了不同的参与式工具,以促进对相关利益攸关方群体所持观念进行全面审视。第一步包括在研究区域开展的机构和利益攸关方分析。第二步包括一个参与式研讨会,在受邀利益攸关方的积极协作下进行一系列范围界定活动。最后一步旨在验证范围界定结果,并建立组织与已确定的生态系统服务之间的依存关系网络。该方法在葡萄牙的一个海洋和沿海保护区——阿拉比达自然公园进行了测试。受邀参与者能够识别自然区域内广泛的生态系统服务清单,建立这些服务与人类福祉之间的联系,识别变化驱动因素,并对相关的生态、社会和经济价值进行初步筛选。案例研究评估对该方法的实用性给出了积极反馈,该方法改进了现有的参与式识别生态系统服务的方法集,并为利益攸关方群体参与评估和管理过程奠定了基础。

相似文献

1
A Collaborative Approach for Scoping Ecosystem Services with Stakeholders: The Case of Arrábida Natural Park.一种与利益相关者共同界定生态系统服务范围的协作方法:以阿拉比达自然公园为例。
Environ Manage. 2016 Aug;58(2):323-42. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0711-5. Epub 2016 May 25.
2
Ecosystem Services Approach in Turnicki National Park Planning: Factors Influencing the Inhabitants' Perspectives on Local Natural Resources and Protected Areas.图尔尼卡国家公园规划中的生态系统服务方法:影响居民对当地自然资源和保护区看法的因素。
Environ Manage. 2024 Sep;74(3):547-563. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-02016-x. Epub 2024 Jul 18.
3
Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass.生态系统服务:城市公园放大镜下的观察。
Environ Res. 2018 Jan;160:469-478. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Nov 5.
4
Quantifying stakeholder understanding of an ecosystem service trade-off.量化利益相关者对生态系统服务权衡的理解。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 15;651(Pt 2):2524-2534. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.090. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
5
Interactions between spatially explicit conservation and management measures: implications for the governance of marine protected areas.空间明确的保护与管理措施之间的相互作用:对海洋保护区治理的启示。
Environ Manage. 2013 Dec;52(6):1355-68. doi: 10.1007/s00267-013-0167-9. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
6
Optimization of an ecological integrity monitoring program for protected areas: Case study for a network of national parks.优化保护区生态完整性监测方案:以国家公园网络为例。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0202902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202902. eCollection 2018.
7
Eliciting local knowledge of ecosystem services using participatory mapping and Photovoice: A case study of Tun Mustapha Park, Malaysia.运用参与式绘图和影像叙事法挖掘生态系统服务的地方知识:以马来西亚敦马士达化公园为例。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253740. eCollection 2021.
8
Stakeholder involvement for management of the coastal zone.利益相关者参与沿海地区管理。
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2016 Oct;12(4):701-10. doi: 10.1002/ieam.1783. Epub 2016 Jul 6.
9
Coordinating community resource use and conservation: An institutional diagnostic practice in the Wuyishan National Park.协调社区资源利用与保护:武夷山国家公园的制度诊断实践。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Sep 1;317:115508. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115508. Epub 2022 Jun 13.
10
Cooperation between scientists, NGOs and industry in support of sustainable fisheries: the South African hake Merluccius spp. trawl fishery experience.科学家、非政府组织和行业之间的合作支持可持续渔业:南非无须鳕 Merluccius spp.拖网渔业的经验。
J Fish Biol. 2013 Oct;83(4):1019-34. doi: 10.1111/jfb.12118. Epub 2013 Jun 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of Soil and Water Conservation Practices on Crop Yield, Run-off, Soil Loss and Nutrient Loss in Ethiopia: Review and Synthesis.埃塞俄比亚水土保持措施对作物产量、径流、土壤流失和养分流失的影响:综述与综合分析
Environ Manage. 2017 Jan;59(1):87-101. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0776-1. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Internet-Based Approaches to Building Stakeholder Networks for Conservation and Natural Resource Management.基于互联网的建立保护和自然资源管理利益相关者网络的方法。
Environ Manage. 2016 Feb;57(2):345-54. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0624-8. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
2
Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands.通过社会网络分析剖析协同治理:以荷兰瓦尔河沿线河流管理为例
Environ Manage. 2016 Feb;57(2):355-67. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0606-x. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
3
Digging Deeper: A Case Study of Farmer Conceptualization of Ecosystem Services in the American South.
深入探究:美国南部农民对生态系统服务概念化的案例研究
Environ Manage. 2015 Oct;56(4):802-13. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0534-9. Epub 2015 May 16.
4
Opportunities and strategies to incorporate ecosystem services knowledge and decision support tools into planning and decision making in Hawai'i.将生态系统服务知识和决策支持工具纳入夏威夷规划与决策的机遇和策略。
Environ Manage. 2015 Apr;55(4):884-99. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0426-4. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
5
Multiple ecosystem services landscape index: a tool for multifunctional landscapes conservation.多生态系统服务景观指数:一种多功能景观保护的工具。
J Environ Manage. 2015 Jan 1;147:152-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 29.
6
Capturing multiple values of ecosystem services shaped by environmental worldviews: a spatial analysis.捕捉受环境世界观影响的多种生态系统服务价值:一项空间分析
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 1;145:374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.014. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
7
Perceiving patagonia: an assessment of social values and perspectives regarding watershed ecosystem services and management in southern South America.感知巴塔哥尼亚:对南美洲南部流域生态系统服务与管理的社会价值观及观点的评估
Environ Manage. 2014 Apr;53(4):769-82. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0237-7. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
8
Perception, demand and user contribution to ecosystem services in the Bilbao Metropolitan Greenbelt.毕尔巴鄂大都市绿化带中的生态系统服务的感知、需求和用户贡献。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Nov 15;129:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.05.059. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
9
Embedded value systems in sustainability assessment tools and their implications.嵌入可持续性评估工具中的价值体系及其影响。
J Environ Manage. 2010 Aug;91(8):1613-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.014. Epub 2010 Apr 22.
10
Ecosystem services as a stakeholder-driven concept for conservation science.生态系统服务作为保护科学中一个由利益相关者驱动的概念。
Conserv Biol. 2010 Jun;24(3):907-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01347.x. Epub 2009 Oct 16.