• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过社会网络分析剖析协同治理:以荷兰瓦尔河沿线河流管理为例

Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands.

作者信息

Fliervoet J M, Geerling G W, Mostert E, Smits A J M

机构信息

Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, Faculty of Science, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Deltares, P.O. Box 177, 2600 MH, Delft, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2016 Feb;57(2):355-67. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0606-x. Epub 2015 Sep 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-015-0606-x
PMID:26324060
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4712244/
Abstract

Until recently, governmental organizations played a dominant and decisive role in natural resource management. However, an increasing number of studies indicate that this dominant role is developing towards a more facilitating role as equal partner to improve efficiency and create a leaner state. This approach is characterized by complex collaborative relationships between various actors and sectors on multiple levels. To understand this complexity in the field of environmental management, we conducted a social network analysis of floodplain management in the Dutch Rhine delta. We charted the current interorganizational relationships between 43 organizations involved in flood protection (blue network) and nature management (green network) and explored the consequences of abolishing the central actor in these networks. The discontinuation of this actor will decrease the connectedness of actors within the blue and green network and may therefore have a large impact on the exchange of ideas and decision-making processes. Furthermore, our research shows the dependence of non-governmental actors on the main governmental organizations. It seems that the Dutch governmental organizations still have a dominant and controlling role in floodplain management. This challenges the alleged shift from a dominant government towards collaborative governance and calls for detailed analysis of actual governance.

摘要

直到最近,政府组织在自然资源管理中一直发挥着主导和决定性作用。然而,越来越多的研究表明,这种主导作用正朝着更具促进性的角色发展,即作为平等伙伴以提高效率并打造更精简的政府。这种方法的特点是不同行为体和部门在多个层面上存在复杂的合作关系。为了理解环境管理领域的这种复杂性,我们对荷兰莱茵河三角洲的洪泛区管理进行了社会网络分析。我们绘制了参与防洪(蓝色网络)和自然管理(绿色网络)的43个组织之间当前的组织间关系,并探讨了取消这些网络中的核心行为体的后果。该行为体的退出将降低蓝色和绿色网络中行为体之间的连通性,因此可能对思想交流和决策过程产生重大影响。此外,我们的研究表明非政府行为体对主要政府组织的依赖。看来荷兰政府组织在洪泛区管理中仍具有主导和控制作用。这对所谓的从主导型政府向合作治理的转变提出了挑战,并呼吁对实际治理进行详细分析。

相似文献

1
Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands.通过社会网络分析剖析协同治理:以荷兰瓦尔河沿线河流管理为例
Environ Manage. 2016 Feb;57(2):355-67. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0606-x. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
2
Combining safety and nature: a multi-stakeholder perspective on integrated floodplain management.兼顾安全与自然:多利益相关方视角下的综合洪泛区管理。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:1033-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.023. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Toward an Understanding of Citywide Urban Environmental Governance: An Examination of Stewardship Networks in Baltimore and Seattle.迈向对全市范围城市环境治理的理解:对巴尔的摩和西雅图管理网络的考察
Environ Manage. 2016 Aug;58(2):254-67. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0704-4. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
Power, influence and structure in Natura 2000 governance networks. A comparative analysis of two protected areas in Romania.自然 2000 治理网络中的权力、影响和结构。罗马尼亚两个保护区的比较分析。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Apr 15;212:54-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.076. Epub 2018 Feb 8.
5
Social network analysis for identifying actors engaged in water governance: An endorheic basin case in the Middle East.社会网络分析在识别参与水治理的行为体中的应用:中东内陆流域案例
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jun 15;288:112376. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112376. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
6
Collaborative emergency preparedness and response to cross-institutional outbreaks of multidrug-resistant organisms: a scenario-based approach in two regions of the Netherlands.跨机构多药耐药菌暴发的协作应急准备和应对:荷兰两个地区的基于情景的方法。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 11;19(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6376-7.
7
Who collaborates and why: Assessment and diagnostic of governance network integration for salmon restoration in Puget Sound, USA.谁进行合作以及为何合作:美国普吉特海湾鲑鱼恢复治理网络整合的评估与诊断
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jan 15;186(Pt 1):64-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.085. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
Analyzing Social Networks to Examine the Changing Governance Structure of Springsheds: A Case Study of Sikkim in the Indian Himalayas.分析社会网络以考察流域治理结构的变化:以印度喜马拉雅山脉锡金邦为例。
Environ Manage. 2019 Feb;63(2):233-248. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1128-0. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
9
The influence of floodplain vegetation succession on hydraulic roughness: is ecosystem rehabilitation in Dutch embanked floodplains compatible with flood safety standards?漫滩植被演替对水力学粗糙度的影响:荷兰筑堤漫滩的生态系统恢复是否符合防洪标准?
Ambio. 2011 Jun;40(4):370-6. doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0120-6.
10
Allocation of river flows for restoration of floodplain forest ecosystems: a review of approaches and their applicability in Europe.用于恢复洪泛区森林生态系统的河流水量分配:方法及其在欧洲适用性的综述
Environ Manage. 2003 Jul;32(1):12-33. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-2834-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Multistakeholder Initiatives and Sustainability? A Governance Analysis using the German Initiative on Sustainable Cocoa (GISCO) as a Case Study.多利益相关方倡议与可持续性?以德国可持续可可倡议(GISCO)为例的治理分析
Environ Manage. 2025 Mar;75(3):490-504. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-02050-9. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
2
Navigating agricultural nonpoint source pollution governance: A social network analysis of best management practices in central Pennsylvania.导航农业面源污染治理:宾夕法尼亚州中部最佳管理实践的社会网络分析。
PLoS One. 2024 May 23;19(5):e0303745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303745. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptation in collaborative governance regimes.协作治理机制的适应性。
Environ Manage. 2014 Oct;54(4):768-81. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0334-7. Epub 2014 Jul 30.
2
Combining safety and nature: a multi-stakeholder perspective on integrated floodplain management.兼顾安全与自然:多利益相关方视角下的综合洪泛区管理。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Oct 15;128:1033-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.023. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
3
Stakeholder analysis combined with social network analysis provides fine-grained insights into water infrastructure planning processes.
Assessing the role of actors in river restoration: A network perspective.
评估演员在河流修复中的作用:网络视角。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 16;19(4):e0297745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297745. eCollection 2024.
4
Adaptive Governance of River Deltas Under Accelerating Environmental Change.加速环境变化下三角洲的适应性治理
Utrecht Law Rev. 2022;18(2):30-50. doi: 10.36633/ulr.803.
5
Resilience and fragmentation in healthcare coalitions: The link between resource contributions and centrality in health-related interorganizational networks.医疗联盟中的恢复力与碎片化:资源贡献与健康相关组织间网络中心性之间的联系。
Soc Networks. 2022 Oct;71:87-95. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2022.07.004. Epub 2022 Jul 28.
6
Animating inter-organisational resilience communication: A participatory social network analysis of water governance in the UK.推动组织间韧性沟通:英国水治理的参与式社会网络分析
Heliyon. 2020 Oct 3;6(10):e05069. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05069. eCollection 2020 Oct.
7
Analyzing Social Networks to Examine the Changing Governance Structure of Springsheds: A Case Study of Sikkim in the Indian Himalayas.分析社会网络以考察流域治理结构的变化:以印度喜马拉雅山脉锡金邦为例。
Environ Manage. 2019 Feb;63(2):233-248. doi: 10.1007/s00267-018-1128-0. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
8
Institutional multiplexity: social networks and community-based natural resource management.机构多元性:社会网络与基于社区的自然资源管理。
Sustain Sci. 2018;13(4):1017-1030. doi: 10.1007/s11625-018-0549-2. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
9
Look Who's Talking. Explaining Water-Related Information Sharing and Demand for Action Among Ugandan Villagers.看看是谁在说话。解读乌干达村民之间与水相关的信息共享及行动需求
Environ Manage. 2016 Nov;58(5):780-796. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0760-9. Epub 2016 Sep 9.
10
A Collaborative Approach for Scoping Ecosystem Services with Stakeholders: The Case of Arrábida Natural Park.一种与利益相关者共同界定生态系统服务范围的协作方法:以阿拉比达自然公园为例。
Environ Manage. 2016 Aug;58(2):323-42. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0711-5. Epub 2016 May 25.
利益相关者分析与社会网络分析相结合,为水利基础设施规划过程提供了深入的见解。
J Environ Manage. 2013 Aug 15;125:134-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.052. Epub 2013 May 6.
4
Network analysis in the social sciences.社会科学中的网络分析。
Science. 2009 Feb 13;323(5916):892-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1165821.
5
Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning.共同管理的演变:知识生成、桥梁组织与社会学习的作用
J Environ Manage. 2009 Apr;90(5):1692-702. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001. Epub 2008 Dec 24.
6
Social networks and community-based natural resource management.社交网络与基于社区的自然资源管理。
Environ Manage. 2008 Oct;42(4):677-87. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9181-8. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
7
Information network topologies for enhanced local adaptive management.用于增强本地自适应管理的信息网络拓扑结构。
Environ Manage. 2005 Feb;35(2):175-93. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0036-7.
8
Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems.为增强社会生态系统的恢复力而进行的适应性共同管理。
Environ Manage. 2004 Jul;34(1):75-90. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7. Epub 2004 Jun 23.