• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解疼痛与症状管理研究中的治疗效果术语。

Understanding Treatment Effect Terminology in Pain and Symptom Management Research.

作者信息

Garrido Melissa M, Dowd Bryan, Hebert Paul L, Maciejewski Matthew L

机构信息

James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.

University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Sep;52(3):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 May 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.01.016
PMID:27220944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6794006/
Abstract

Within health services and medical research, there is a wide variety of terminology related to treatment effects. Understanding differences in types of treatment effects is especially important in pain and symptom management research where nonexperimental and quasiexperimental observational data analysis is common. We use the example of a palliative care consultation team leader considering implementation of a medication reconciliation program and a care-coordination intervention reported in the literature to illustrate population-level and conditional treatment effects and to highlight the sensitivity of values of treatment effects to sample selection and treatment assignment. Our goal is to facilitate appropriate reporting and interpretation of study results and to help investigators understand what information a decision maker needs when deciding whether to implement a treatment. Greater awareness of the reasons why treatment effects may differ across studies of the same patients in the same treatment settings can help policy makers and clinicians understand to whom a study's results may be generalized.

摘要

在卫生服务和医学研究领域,与治疗效果相关的术语种类繁多。在疼痛和症状管理研究中,理解不同类型治疗效果之间的差异尤为重要,因为非实验性和准实验性观察数据分析在这类研究中很常见。我们以一位姑息治疗咨询团队负责人为例,该负责人考虑实施一项文献中报道的药物重整计划和护理协调干预措施,以说明总体水平和条件性治疗效果,并强调治疗效果值对样本选择和治疗分配的敏感性。我们的目标是促进对研究结果进行恰当的报告和解读,并帮助研究人员了解决策者在决定是否实施某种治疗时需要哪些信息。对于在相同治疗环境下对同一患者进行的不同研究中治疗效果为何可能存在差异有更深入的认识,有助于政策制定者和临床医生理解一项研究的结果可能适用于哪些人群。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9277/6794006/fba46d78a470/nihms-1054339-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9277/6794006/e8972a8c39fc/nihms-1054339-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9277/6794006/fba46d78a470/nihms-1054339-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9277/6794006/e8972a8c39fc/nihms-1054339-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9277/6794006/fba46d78a470/nihms-1054339-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Understanding Treatment Effect Terminology in Pain and Symptom Management Research.理解疼痛与症状管理研究中的治疗效果术语。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Sep;52(3):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.01.016. Epub 2016 May 21.
2
Propensity scores: a tool to help quantify treatment effects in observational studies.倾向评分:一种有助于量化观察性研究中治疗效果的工具。
J Bras Pneumol. 2017 Mar-Apr;43(2):86. doi: 10.1590/S1806-37562017000000099.
3
Comparison between treatment effects in a randomised controlled trial and an observational study using propensity scores in primary care.在初级保健中使用倾向评分比较随机对照试验和观察性研究中的治疗效果。
Br J Gen Pract. 2017 Sep;67(662):e643-e649. doi: 10.3399/bjgp17X692153. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
4
Propensity scores: a practical method for assessing treatment effects in pain and symptom management research.倾向得分:疼痛与症状管理研究中评估治疗效果的实用方法。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Oct;48(4):711-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.05.014. Epub 2014 Jun 14.
5
[Healthcare Research into Anti-VEGF Therapy: Selection and Methodological Precautions].[抗血管内皮生长因子治疗的医疗保健研究:选择与方法学预防措施]
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017 Dec;234(12):1483-1492. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-115393. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
6
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
7
Types and rate of implementation of palliative care team recommendations for care of hospitalized veterans.姑息治疗团队针对住院退伍军人护理的建议的实施类型及比率
J Palliat Med. 2004 Dec;7(6):784-90. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2004.7.784.
8
A phase III wait-listed randomised controlled trial of novel targeted inter-professional clinical education intervention to improve cancer patients' reported pain outcomes (The Cancer Pain Assessment (CPAS) Trial): study protocol.一项关于新型针对性跨专业临床教育干预以改善癌症患者报告的疼痛结局的III期等待名单随机对照试验(癌症疼痛评估(CPAS)试验):研究方案
Trials. 2019 Jan 18;20(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3152-z.
9
Challenges in the design of a Home Telemanagement trial for patients with ulcerative colitis.溃疡性结肠炎患者家庭远程管理试验设计中的挑战。
Clin Trials. 2009 Dec;6(6):649-57. doi: 10.1177/1740774509346978. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
10
[Not Available].[无可用内容]
Recenti Prog Med. 2019 Nov;110(11):531. doi: 10.1701/3265.32352.

引用本文的文献

1
Tobacco retailer density and its association with birth outcomes in the USA: 2000-2016.美国烟草零售商密度及其与2000 - 2016年出生结局的关联
Tob Control. 2024 Aug 21. doi: 10.1136/tc-2024-058779.
2
Assessing the properties of patient-specific treatment effect estimates from causal forest algorithms under essential heterogeneity.评估因果森林算法在本质异质性下对特定于患者的治疗效果估计的特性。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Mar 13;24(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02187-5.
3
Assessing the ability of an instrumental variable causal forest algorithm to personalize treatment evidence using observational data: the case of early surgery for shoulder fracture.

本文引用的文献

1
A Subgroup Analysis Found no Diminished Response to Buprenorphine Transdermal System Treatment for Chronic Low Back Pain Patients Classified with Depression.亚组分析发现,对于被归类为患有抑郁症的慢性下腰痛患者,丁丙诺啡透皮系统治疗的反应并未减弱。
Pain Pract. 2016 Apr;16(4):473-85. doi: 10.1111/papr.12298. Epub 2015 Apr 11.
2
Improving diabetes prevention with benefit based tailored treatment: risk based reanalysis of Diabetes Prevention Program.通过基于获益的个性化治疗改善糖尿病预防:糖尿病预防计划的基于风险的重新分析
BMJ. 2015 Feb 19;350:h454. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h454.
3
ESTIMATING PERSON-CENTERED TREATMENT (PeT) EFFECTS USING INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLES: AN APPLICATION TO EVALUATING PROSTATE CANCER TREATMENTS.
评估工具变量因果森林算法利用观察数据进行个体化治疗证据的能力:以肩部骨折早期手术为例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01663-0.
4
What are the health consequences associated with differences in medical malpractice liability laws? An instrumental variable analysis of surgery effects on health outcomes for proximal humeral facture across states with different liability rules.不同医疗事故责任法律相关的健康后果是什么?利用工具变量分析不同责任规则州的近端肱骨骨折手术效果对健康结果的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 May 3;22(1):590. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07839-0.
5
The Impact of Primary Tumor Resection on Survival in Asymptomatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Unresectable Metastases.原发性肿瘤切除对无法切除转移灶的无症状结直肠癌患者生存的影响。
Ann Coloproctol. 2021 Apr;37(2):94-100. doi: 10.3393/ac.2020.09.15.1. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
6
Association of Surgical Treatment With Adverse Events and Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Proximal Humerus Fracture.医疗保险受益人与肱骨近端骨折患者手术治疗与不良事件和死亡率的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jan 3;3(1):e1918663. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18663.
使用工具变量估计以患者为中心的治疗(PeT)效果:在评估前列腺癌治疗中的应用。
J Appl Econ (Chichester Engl). 2014 June/July;29(4):671-691. doi: 10.1002/jae.2343.
4
Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of octreotide in malignant bowel obstruction.奥曲肽治疗恶性肠梗阻的双盲、安慰剂对照、随机试验
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 May;49(5):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2014.09.013. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
5
Generalizing observational study results: applying propensity score methods to complex surveys.将观察性研究结果推广:将倾向评分方法应用于复杂调查。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1):284-303. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12090. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
6
A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models.使用广义提升模型进行多种处理的倾向评分估计教程。
Stat Med. 2013 Aug 30;32(19):3388-414. doi: 10.1002/sim.5753. Epub 2013 Mar 18.
7
Analyzing phase III studies in hospice/palliative care. a solution that sits between intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses: the palliative-modified ITT analysis.分析临终关怀/姑息治疗的 III 期研究。一种处于意向治疗和方案分析之间的解决方案:姑息治疗修正意向治疗分析。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Oct;44(4):595-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.10.028. Epub 2012 Jul 21.
8
Choosing models for health care cost analyses: issues of nonlinearity and endogeneity.选择用于医疗成本分析的模型:非线性和内生性问题。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Dec;47(6):2377-97. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01414.x. Epub 2012 Apr 23.
9
The effect of Medicaid nursing home reimbursement policy on Medicare hospice use in nursing homes.医疗补助养老院报销政策对养老院中使用医疗保险临终关怀服务的影响。
Med Care. 2011 Sep;49(9):797-802. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318223c0ae.
10
Hospice care and survival among elderly patients with lung cancer.老年肺癌患者的临终关怀和生存状况。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Aug;14(8):929-39. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0522. Epub 2011 Jul 18.