• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

女性比男性更热情,但同样坚定:脸书上的性别与语言

Women are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook.

作者信息

Park Gregory, Yaden David Bryce, Schwartz H Andrew, Kern Margaret L, Eichstaedt Johannes C, Kosinski Michael, Stillwell David, Ungar Lyle H, Seligman Martin E P

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.

Computer Science Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2016 May 25;11(5):e0155885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155885. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0155885
PMID:27223607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4881750/
Abstract

Using a large social media dataset and open-vocabulary methods from computational linguistics, we explored differences in language use across gender, affiliation, and assertiveness. In Study 1, we analyzed topics (groups of semantically similar words) across 10 million messages from over 52,000 Facebook users. Most language differed little across gender. However, topics most associated with self-identified female participants included friends, family, and social life, whereas topics most associated with self-identified male participants included swearing, anger, discussion of objects instead of people, and the use of argumentative language. In Study 2, we plotted male- and female-linked language topics along two interpersonal dimensions prevalent in gender research: affiliation and assertiveness. In a sample of over 15,000 Facebook users, we found substantial gender differences in the use of affiliative language and slight differences in assertive language. Language used more by self-identified females was interpersonally warmer, more compassionate, polite, and-contrary to previous findings-slightly more assertive in their language use, whereas language used more by self-identified males was colder, more hostile, and impersonal. Computational linguistic analysis combined with methods to automatically label topics offer means for testing psychological theories unobtrusively at large scale.

摘要

利用一个大型社交媒体数据集以及计算语言学中的开放词汇方法,我们探究了不同性别、所属群体和 assertiveness 在语言使用上的差异。在研究 1 中,我们分析了来自 52000 多名脸书用户的 1000 万条信息中的主题(语义相似的词群)。大多数语言在性别上差异不大。然而,与自我认定为女性的参与者最相关的主题包括朋友、家庭和社交生活,而与自我认定为男性的参与者最相关的主题包括咒骂、愤怒、对事物而非人的讨论以及辩论性语言的使用。在研究 2 中,我们沿着性别研究中普遍存在的两个人际维度——所属群体和 assertiveness,绘制了与男性和女性相关的语言主题。在一个超过 15000 名脸书用户的样本中,我们发现所属群体语言的使用存在显著的性别差异,而 assertive 语言存在细微差异。自我认定为女性更多使用的语言在人际方面更温暖、更有同情心、更礼貌,并且——与之前的研究结果相反——在语言使用上略显更 assertive,而自我认定为男性更多使用的语言则更冷漠、更具敌意且缺乏人情味。计算语言学分析与自动标注主题的方法相结合,为大规模地悄然测试心理学理论提供了手段。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/a2bff3a6d751/pone.0155885.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/4cdfb42d2751/pone.0155885.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/6fea5cb05c85/pone.0155885.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/63028356f4d2/pone.0155885.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/87136fbd95ec/pone.0155885.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/f3ccb3e1bc4f/pone.0155885.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/a2bff3a6d751/pone.0155885.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/4cdfb42d2751/pone.0155885.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/6fea5cb05c85/pone.0155885.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/63028356f4d2/pone.0155885.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/87136fbd95ec/pone.0155885.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/f3ccb3e1bc4f/pone.0155885.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/273f/4881750/a2bff3a6d751/pone.0155885.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Women are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook.女性比男性更热情,但同样坚定:脸书上的性别与语言
PLoS One. 2016 May 25;11(5):e0155885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155885. eCollection 2016.
2
A meta-analytic review of gender variations in adults' language use: talkativeness, affiliative speech, and assertive speech.成年人语言使用中性别差异的元分析综述:健谈、亲和性言语及 assertive speech(此处 assertive speech 可直译为“坚定性言语”,但结合语境可能有更合适的意译,不过按要求直接翻译)
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Nov;11(4):328-63. doi: 10.1177/1088868307302221.
3
From "Sooo excited!!!" to "So proud": using language to study development.从“太兴奋了!!!”到“太自豪了”:用语言研究发展。
Dev Psychol. 2014 Jan;50(1):178-88. doi: 10.1037/a0035048. Epub 2013 Nov 25.
4
Closed- and open-vocabulary approaches to text analysis: A review, quantitative comparison, and recommendations.封闭式和开放式词汇方法在文本分析中的应用:综述、定量比较和建议。
Psychol Methods. 2021 Aug;26(4):398-427. doi: 10.1037/met0000349.
5
Public Perceptions Regarding Use of Virtual Reality in Health Care: A Social Media Content Analysis Using Facebook.公众对虚拟现实在医疗保健中应用的认知:一项使用脸书的社交媒体内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 19;19(12):e419. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7467.
6
Assertiveness predicts threat and challenge reactions to potential stress among women.自信预示着女性对潜在压力的威胁和挑战反应。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jun;76(6):1008-21. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.6.1008.
7
Variations in Facebook Posting Patterns Across Validated Patient Health Conditions: A Prospective Cohort Study.不同经证实的患者健康状况下Facebook发帖模式的差异:一项前瞻性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 6;19(1):e7. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6486.
8
Guided imagery of female sexual assertiveness: turn on or turn off?女性性自信的引导式意象:激发还是抑制?
J Sex Marital Ther. 1985 Spring;11(1):41-50. doi: 10.1080/00926238508405957.
9
Linguistic predictors from Facebook postings of substance use disorder treatment retention versus discontinuation.社交媒体帖文中的语言预测因子与物质使用障碍治疗的保留和中断。
Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2022 Sep 3;48(5):573-585. doi: 10.1080/00952990.2022.2091450. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
10
Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach.社交媒体语言中的个性、性别和年龄:开放词汇方法。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e73791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073791. eCollection 2013.

引用本文的文献

1
"Double Bind" with a twist: A corpus-assisted discourse study of gender performances of male and female entrepreneurs on Twitter (now X).带有转折的“双重束缚”:一项基于语料库的话语研究,探讨男性和女性企业家在推特(现称X)上的性别表现
PLoS One. 2025 Aug 29;20(8):e0331400. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331400. eCollection 2025.
2
CIDER: Context-sensitive polarity measurement for short-form text.CIDER:用于短文本的上下文敏感极性测量。
PLoS One. 2024 Apr 18;19(4):e0299490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299490. eCollection 2024.
3
The queen bee phenomenon in Canadian surgical subspecialties: An evaluation of gender biases in the resident training environment.

本文引用的文献

1
Facebook as a research tool for the social sciences: Opportunities, challenges, ethical considerations, and practical guidelines.脸书作为社会科学的研究工具:机遇、挑战、伦理考量及实用指南。
Am Psychol. 2015 Sep;70(6):543-56. doi: 10.1037/a0039210.
2
National hiring experiments reveal 2:1 faculty preference for women on STEM tenure track.全国性招聘实验表明,在科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)终身教职岗位上,教员对女性的偏好比例为2比1。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Apr 28;112(17):5360-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1418878112. Epub 2015 Apr 13.
3
Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines.
加拿大外科亚专业领域的“蜂王现象”:对住院医师培训环境中性别偏见的评估。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 6;19(3):e0297893. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297893. eCollection 2024.
4
Emotional straying: Flux and management of women's emotions in social media.情感游离:社交媒体中女性情感的流动与管理。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 13;18(12):e0295835. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295835. eCollection 2023.
5
Masculine men do not like feminine wording: The effectiveness of gendered wording in health promotion leaflets in the UK.男性不喜欢女性化的措辞:英国健康促进传单中使用性别措辞的效果。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 27;17(10):e0273927. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273927. eCollection 2022.
6
Understanding the expression of loneliness on Twitter across age groups and genders.了解不同年龄组和性别人群在 Twitter 上表达孤独感的方式。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0273636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273636. eCollection 2022.
7
Linguistic gender congruity differentially correlates with film and novel ratings by critics and audiences.语言性别一致性与影评人和观众对电影和小说的评分呈显著相关。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 19;17(4):e0248402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248402. eCollection 2022.
8
Understanding Communication in an Online Cancer Forum: Content Analysis Study.理解在线癌症论坛中的交流:内容分析研究
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 7;7(3):e29555. doi: 10.2196/29555.
9
Studying How Individuals Who Express the Feeling of Loneliness in an Online Loneliness Forum Communicate in a Nonloneliness Forum: Observational Study.研究在在线孤独论坛中表达孤独感的个体如何在非孤独论坛中进行交流:观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 20;5(7):e28738. doi: 10.2196/28738.
10
Stereotyping in the digital age: Male language is "ingenious", female language is "beautiful" - and popular.数字时代的刻板印象:男性语言“巧妙”,女性语言“优美”——且广受欢迎。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 16;15(12):e0243637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243637. eCollection 2020.
对杰出表现的期望是造成各学术领域性别分布差异的原因之一。
Science. 2015 Jan 16;347(6219):262-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1261375.
4
Social sciences. Social media for large studies of behavior.社会科学。用于大规模行为研究的社交媒体。
Science. 2014 Nov 28;346(6213):1063-4. doi: 10.1126/science.346.6213.1063.
5
Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach.社交媒体语言中的个性、性别和年龄:开放词汇方法。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e73791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073791. eCollection 2013.
6
Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior.个人特质和属性可从人类行为的数字记录中预测出来。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Apr 9;110(15):5802-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218772110. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
7
Unifying the aspects of the Big Five, the interpersonal circumplex, and trait affiliation.统一大五人格、人际关系双元模型和特质关联。
J Pers. 2013 Oct;81(5):465-75. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12020. Epub 2013 Feb 21.
8
Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students.理科教员微妙的性别偏见偏爱男学生。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 9;109(41):16474-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
Topic models: a novel method for modeling couple and family text data.主题模型:一种用于建模夫妻和家庭文本数据的新方法。
J Fam Psychol. 2012 Oct;26(5):816-27. doi: 10.1037/a0029607. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
10
Gender differences in the correlates of self-referent word use: authority, entitlement, and depressive symptoms.自我参照词汇使用的相关因素中的性别差异:权威、权利感和抑郁症状。
J Pers. 2010 Feb;78(1):313-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00617.x.