• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Understanding Communication in an Online Cancer Forum: Content Analysis Study.理解在线癌症论坛中的交流:内容分析研究
JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 7;7(3):e29555. doi: 10.2196/29555.
2
Studying How Individuals Who Express the Feeling of Loneliness in an Online Loneliness Forum Communicate in a Nonloneliness Forum: Observational Study.研究在在线孤独论坛中表达孤独感的个体如何在非孤独论坛中进行交流:观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 20;5(7):e28738. doi: 10.2196/28738.
3
Understanding user communication around loneliness on online forums.理解用户在在线论坛上围绕孤独感进行的交流。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 23;16(9):e0257791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257791. eCollection 2021.
4
Posting patterns in peer online support forums and their associations with emotions and mood in bipolar disorder: Exploratory analysis.双相障碍患者在同伴在线支持论坛中的发帖模式及其与情绪和心境的关联:探索性分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 25;18(9):e0291369. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0291369. eCollection 2023.
5
Understanding Mental Health Issues in Different Subdomains of Social Networking Services: Computational Analysis of Text-Based Reddit Posts.理解不同社交网络服务领域的心理健康问题:基于文本的 Reddit 帖子的计算分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Nov 30;25:e49074. doi: 10.2196/49074.
6
Analyzing Empowerment Processes Among Cancer Patients in an Online Community: A Text Mining Approach.分析在线社区中癌症患者的赋权过程:一种文本挖掘方法。
JMIR Cancer. 2019 Apr 17;5(1):e9887. doi: 10.2196/cancer.9887.
7
Changes in Language Style and Topics in an Online Eating Disorder Community at the Beginning of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Study.新冠疫情大流行初期在线饮食失调症社区中语言风格和主题的变化:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jul 8;23(7):e28346. doi: 10.2196/28346.
8
Studying expressions of loneliness in individuals using twitter: an observational study.利用推特研究个体的孤独感表达:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 4;9(11):e030355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030355.
9
Examining Social Capital, Social Support, and Language Use in an Online Depression Forum: Social Network and Content Analysis.在线抑郁症论坛中的社会资本、社会支持与语言使用研究:社会网络与内容分析
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 24;22(6):e17365. doi: 10.2196/17365.
10
Sharing and Empathy in Digital Spaces: Qualitative Study of Online Health Forums for Breast Cancer and Motor Neuron Disease (Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis).数字空间中的分享与同理心:乳腺癌和运动神经元病(肌萎缩侧索硬化症)在线健康论坛的定性研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jun 14;20(6):e222. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9709.

引用本文的文献

1
Predicting negative attitudes towards suicide in social media texts: prediction model development and validation study.预测社交媒体文本中对自杀的负面态度:预测模型的开发和验证研究。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 8;12:1401322. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1401322. eCollection 2024.
2
The Association Between Linguistic Characteristics of Physicians' Communication and Their Economic Returns: Mixed Method Study.医生沟通的语言特征与其经济回报之间的关联:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jan 11;26:e42850. doi: 10.2196/42850.
3
Use of Online Health Forums by People Living With Breast Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Thematic Analysis.新冠疫情期间乳腺癌患者对在线健康论坛的使用:主题分析
JMIR Cancer. 2023 Feb 7;9:e42783. doi: 10.2196/42783.
4
Understanding the expression of loneliness on Twitter across age groups and genders.了解不同年龄组和性别人群在 Twitter 上表达孤独感的方式。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 28;17(9):e0273636. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273636. eCollection 2022.
5
A Multimethod Evaluation of Tobacco Treatment Trial Recruitment Messages for Current Smokers Recently Diagnosed With Cancer: Pilot Factorial Randomized Controlled Trial.对近期被诊断患有癌症的当前吸烟者的烟草治疗试验招募信息的多方法评估:试点析因随机对照试验
JMIR Cancer. 2022 Aug 24;8(3):e37526. doi: 10.2196/37526.
6
Deciphering the Diversity of Mental Models in Neurodevelopmental Disorders: Knowledge Graph Representation of Public Data Using Natural Language Processing.解读神经发育障碍中心理模型的多样性:使用自然语言处理对公共数据进行知识图谱表示。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Aug 5;24(8):e39888. doi: 10.2196/39888.

本文引用的文献

1
Studying How Individuals Who Express the Feeling of Loneliness in an Online Loneliness Forum Communicate in a Nonloneliness Forum: Observational Study.研究在在线孤独论坛中表达孤独感的个体如何在非孤独论坛中进行交流:观察性研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 20;5(7):e28738. doi: 10.2196/28738.
2
Predicting Cardiovascular Risk Using Social Media Data: Performance Evaluation of Machine-Learning Models.利用社交媒体数据预测心血管风险:机器学习模型的性能评估
JMIR Cardio. 2021 Feb 19;5(1):e24473. doi: 10.2196/24473.
3
Studying expressions of loneliness in individuals using twitter: an observational study.利用推特研究个体的孤独感表达:一项观察性研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 4;9(11):e030355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030355.
4
The Channel Matters: Self-disclosure, Reciprocity and Social Support in Online Cancer Support Groups.渠道很重要:在线癌症支持小组中的自我表露、互惠与社会支持
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2019 May;2019. doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300261.
5
Seekers, Providers, Welcomers, and Storytellers: Modeling Social Roles in Online Health Communities.探索者、提供者、欢迎者和讲述者:在线健康社区中的社会角色建模
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2019 May;2019. doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300574.
6
Commitment of Newcomers and Old-timers to Online Health Support Communities.新手和老手对在线健康支持社区的投入。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2017 May;2017:6363-6375. doi: 10.1145/3025453.3026008.
7
Women are Warmer but No Less Assertive than Men: Gender and Language on Facebook.女性比男性更热情,但同样坚定:脸书上的性别与语言
PLoS One. 2016 May 25;11(5):e0155885. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155885. eCollection 2016.
8
Eliciting and receiving online support: using computer-aided content analysis to examine the dynamics of online social support.引出并接受在线支持:使用计算机辅助内容分析来审视在线社会支持的动态变化。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Apr 20;17(4):e99. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3558.
9
Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: the open-vocabulary approach.社交媒体语言中的个性、性别和年龄:开放词汇方法。
PLoS One. 2013 Sep 25;8(9):e73791. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073791. eCollection 2013.

理解在线癌症论坛中的交流:内容分析研究

Understanding Communication in an Online Cancer Forum: Content Analysis Study.

作者信息

Andy Anietie, Andy Uduak

机构信息

Penn Medicine Center for Digital Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Cancer. 2021 Sep 7;7(3):e29555. doi: 10.2196/29555.

DOI:10.2196/29555
PMID:34491209
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8456325/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cancer affects individuals, their family members, and friends, and increasingly, some of these individuals are turning to online cancer forums to express their thoughts/feelings and seek support such as asking cancer-related questions. The thoughts/feelings expressed and the support needed from these online forums may differ depending on if (1) an individual has or had cancer or (2) an individual is a family member or friend of an individual who has or had cancer; the language used in posts in these forums may reflect these differences.

OBJECTIVE

Using natural language processing methods, we aim to determine the differences in the support needs and concerns expressed in posts published on an online cancer forum by (1) users who self-declare to have or had cancer compared with (2) users who self-declare to be family members or friends of individuals with or that had cancer.

METHODS

Using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), which is a natural language processing algorithm and Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), a psycholinguistic dictionary, we analyzed posts published on an online cancer forum with the aim to delineate the language features associated with users in these different groups.

RESULTS

Users who self-declare to have or had cancer were more likely to post about LDA topics related to hospital visits (Cohen d=0.671) and use words associated with LIWC categories related to health (Cohen d=0.635) and anxiety (Cohen d=0.126). By contrast, users who declared to be family members or friends tend to post about LDA topics related to losing a family member (Cohen d=0.702) and LIWC categories focusing on the past (Cohen d=0.465) and death (Cohen d=0.181) were more associated with these users.

CONCLUSIONS

Using LDA and LIWC, we show that there are differences in the support needs and concerns expressed in posts published on an online cancer forum by users with cancer compared with family members or friends of those with cancer. Hence, responders to online cancer forums need to be cognizant of these differences in support needs and concerns and tailor their responses based on these findings.

摘要

背景

癌症会影响患者本人、其家庭成员和朋友,越来越多的此类人群开始转向在线癌症论坛来表达自己的想法/感受,并寻求支持,比如询问与癌症相关的问题。这些在线论坛上表达的想法/感受以及所需的支持可能因以下情况而有所不同:(1)个人是否患有或曾患癌症;(2)个人是患有或曾患癌症者的家庭成员或朋友;这些论坛帖子中使用的语言可能反映出这些差异。

目的

运用自然语言处理方法,我们旨在确定在一个在线癌症论坛上发布的帖子中,(1)自称患有或曾患癌症的用户与(2)自称是患有或曾患癌症者的家庭成员或朋友的用户所表达的支持需求和担忧的差异。

方法

使用潜在狄利克雷分配(LDA,一种自然语言处理算法)和语言查询与字数统计(LIWC,一本心理语言学词典),我们分析了在一个在线癌症论坛上发布的帖子,目的是描绘与这些不同群体用户相关的语言特征。

结果

自称患有或曾患癌症的用户更有可能发布与医院就诊相关的LDA主题(科恩d值 = 0.671),并使用与LIWC中与健康(科恩d值 = 0.635)和焦虑(科恩d值 = 0.126)相关类别的词汇。相比之下,自称是家庭成员或朋友的用户倾向于发布与失去家庭成员相关的LDA主题(科恩d值 = 0.702),并且LIWC中关注过去(科恩d值 = 0.465)和死亡(科恩d值 = 0.181)的类别与这些用户的关联更大。

结论

通过使用LDA和LIWC,我们表明,与癌症患者的家庭成员或朋友相比,癌症患者在在线癌症论坛上发布的帖子中所表达的支持需求和担忧存在差异。因此,在线癌症论坛的回复者需要认识到这些支持需求和担忧的差异,并根据这些发现调整他们的回复。