Southern L L, Stewart T B, Bodak-Koszalka E, Leon D L, Hoyt P G, Bessette M E
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge.
J Anim Sci. 1989 Mar;67(3):628-34. doi: 10.2527/jas1989.673628x.
An experiment was conducted with 96 weanling pigs (avg initial wt 18.5 kg) divided into six treatment with two replicates of eight pigs each. Pigs in Treatments 1, 2 and 3 were penned in outside pens with dirt lots that previously were contaminated with A. suum ova to induce a natural ascaris infection. Pigs in Treatments 4, 5 and 6 were penned in an open-front building with solid concrete floors and were experimentally infected with 2,000 embryonated A. suum. ova on d 1, 15 and 29 of the experiment. Pigs in Treatments 1 and 4 were medicated with fenbendazole (FBZ, 3 mg/[kg BW.d]) for three consecutive days during three consecutive time periods. Pigs in Treatments 2 and 5 were medicated with pyrantel tartrate (PT, 106 mg/kg feed) for 28 d. Pigs in Treatments 3 and 6 served as infected, unmedicated controls. All pigs were challenged with 100 A. suum eggs 7 d after termination of the final FBZ treatment. All pigs were killed 66 d after challenge and worms were recovered. Fenbendazole treatment resulted in greater (P less than .07) average daily gain than PT treatment in pigs penned outside. Among inside pigs, FBZ treatment resulted in better (P less than .02) feed utilization than in controls. The FBZ and PT treatments reduced (P less than .03) the total number of A. suum, the length and weight of female ascarids and the length of male ascarids compared with controls. A natural continual infection with A. suum was less effective than experimental infection in inducing protective immunity in pigs.
用96头断奶仔猪(平均初始体重18.5千克)进行了一项实验,将其分为6个处理组,每组8头猪,重复2次。处理1、2和3组的猪被关在室外带有脏地的围栏中,这些脏地先前被猪蛔虫卵污染,以诱发自然蛔虫感染。处理4、5和6组的猪被关在有开放式前脸且地面为实心混凝土的建筑中,并在实验的第1天、15天和29天用2000个感染性猪蛔虫卵进行人工感染。处理1和4组的猪在三个连续时间段内连续三天用芬苯达唑(FBZ,3毫克/[千克体重·天])进行药物治疗。处理2和5组的猪用酒石酸噻嘧啶(PT,106毫克/千克饲料)治疗28天。处理3和6组的猪作为感染但未用药的对照组。在最后一次FBZ治疗结束7天后,所有猪都用100个猪蛔虫卵进行攻毒。攻毒66天后,所有猪被处死并回收蠕虫。在室外饲养的猪中,芬苯达唑治疗组的平均日增重比酒石酸噻嘧啶治疗组更高(P小于0.07)。在室内饲养的猪中,芬苯达唑治疗组的饲料利用率比对照组更好(P小于0.02)。与对照组相比,芬苯达唑和酒石酸噻嘧啶治疗组减少了(P小于0.03)猪蛔虫的总数、雌虫的长度和重量以及雄虫的长度。猪蛔虫的自然持续感染在诱导猪的保护性免疫方面不如人工感染有效。