• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Screening for developmental delay among children aged 1-4 years: a systematic review.1-4岁儿童发育迟缓筛查:一项系统综述
CMAJ Open. 2016 Jan 25;4(1):E20-7. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20140121. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

引用本文的文献

1
Sensitivity and Specificity of Developmental Surveillance and Autism Screening in an Australian Multicultural Cohort: The Watch Me Grow Study.澳大利亚多元文化队列中发育监测与自闭症筛查的敏感性和特异性:“关注我成长”研究
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06859-z.
2
The lasting influence of parenting intervention on child behavior: findings from a randomized clinical trial using care for child development guidelines.养育干预对儿童行为的持久影响:一项使用儿童发展指导方针进行护理的随机临床试验的结果。
BMC Pediatr. 2024 Nov 27;24(1):772. doi: 10.1186/s12887-024-05253-5.
3
Standardization of a Developmental Milestone Scale Using Data From Children in Israel.使用以色列儿童的数据对发育里程碑量表进行标准化。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Mar 1;5(3):e222184. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.2184.
4
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Jul;67(7):e157-e168. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6707e157.
5
2020 edition of the Rourke Baby Record: What is new in preventive care of children up to 5 years of age?2020 版《Rourke 婴儿记录》:5 岁以下儿童预防保健有哪些新内容?
Can Fam Physician. 2021 Jul;67(7):488-498. doi: 10.46747/cfp.6707488.
6
A Prediction Model for Detecting Developmental Disabilities in Preschool-Age Children Through Digital Biomarker-Driven Deep Learning in Serious Games: Development Study.通过严肃游戏中数字生物标志物驱动的深度学习检测学龄前儿童发育障碍的预测模型:开发研究
JMIR Serious Games. 2021 Jun 4;9(2):e23130. doi: 10.2196/23130.
7
Screening tools for early identification of children with developmental delay in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.低收入和中等收入国家发育迟缓儿童早期识别的筛查工具:一项系统综述
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 23;10(11):e038182. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038182.
8
Sensitivity and specificity of a low-cost screening protocol for identifying children at risk for language disorders.一种低成本筛查方案识别有语言障碍风险儿童的敏感性和特异性。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2020 Apr 6;75:e1426. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2020/e1426. eCollection 2020.
9
Effects of a family-centered workshop for children with developmental delays.以家庭为中心的工作坊对发育迟缓儿童的影响。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(36):e12106. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012106.
10
Using the ages and stages questionnaire in the general population as a measure for identifying children not at risk of a neurodevelopmental disorder.在普通人群中使用年龄与发育阶段问卷作为识别无神经发育障碍风险儿童的一种测量方法。
BMC Pediatr. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12887-018-1105-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Speech and Language Delay and Disorders in Children Aged 5 Years or Younger: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.5 岁或以下儿童言语和语言延迟及障碍的筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):e474-81. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-1711. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
2
Prevention of overweight and obesity in children and youth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.儿童和青少年超重与肥胖的预防:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
CMAJ Open. 2015 Jan 13;3(1):E23-33. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20140053. eCollection 2015 Jan-Mar.
3
Treatment for overweight and obesity in adult populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成年人群超重和肥胖的治疗:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
CMAJ Open. 2014 Oct 1;2(4):E306-17. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20140012. eCollection 2014 Oct.
4
Prevention of overweight and obesity in adult populations: a systematic review.成年人群超重和肥胖的预防:一项系统综述
CMAJ Open. 2014 Oct 1;2(4):E268-72. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20140019. eCollection 2014 Oct.
5
Early childhood investments substantially boost adult health.早期儿童投资可极大促进成年人健康。
Science. 2014 Mar 28;343(6178):1478-85. doi: 10.1126/science.1248429.
6
Beyond autism: a baby siblings research consortium study of high-risk children at three years of age.超越自闭症:高危儿童三岁时的婴儿兄弟姐妹研究联盟研究。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013 Mar;52(3):300-308.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2012.12.011. Epub 2013 Feb 8.
7
Effectiveness of developmental screening in an urban setting.发育筛查在城市环境中的效果。
Pediatrics. 2013 Jan;131(1):30-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0765. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
8
Intervening in infancy: implications for autism spectrum disorders.干预婴儿期:对自闭症谱系障碍的影响。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;51(12):1300-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02308.x. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
9
A cluster-randomized trial of screening for language delay in toddlers: effects on school performance and language development at age 8.一项针对幼儿语言发育迟缓筛查的整群随机试验:对8岁时学业成绩和语言发展的影响。
Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120(6):1317-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-3145.
10
Identification and evaluation of children with autism spectrum disorders.自闭症谱系障碍儿童的识别与评估。
Pediatrics. 2007 Nov;120(5):1183-215. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2361. Epub 2007 Oct 29.

1-4岁儿童发育迟缓筛查:一项系统综述

Screening for developmental delay among children aged 1-4 years: a systematic review.

作者信息

Warren Rachel, Kenny Meghan, Bennett Teresa, Fitzpatrick-Lewis Donna, Ali Muhammad Usman, Sherifali Diana, Raina Parminder

机构信息

Evidence Review and Synthesis Centre, and Offord Centre for Child Studies, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.

出版信息

CMAJ Open. 2016 Jan 25;4(1):E20-7. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20140121. eCollection 2016 Jan-Mar.

DOI:10.9778/cmajo.20140121
PMID:27226967
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4866933/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Existing guidelines on screening children less than 5 years of age for developmental delay vary. In this systematic review, we synthesized the literature on the effectiveness and harms of screening for developmental delay in asymptomatic children aged 1-4 years.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase and PsychINFO for relevant articles published to June 16, 2015. We identified studies that included children aged 1-4 years who were not at high risk of developmental delay, screened in a primary care setting. Randomized trials and controlled cohort studies were considered for benefits (cognitive, academic and functional outcomes); no restrictions on study design were imposed for the review of harms.

RESULTS

Two studies were included. One used the Ages and Stages Questionnaire II for screening and reported significantly more referrals to early intervention in the intervention groups than in the control group (relative risk [RR] 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.49-2.54, in the intervention group with office support and RR 1.71, 95% CI 1.30-2.25, in the intervention group without office support). The time to referral was 70% shorter in the intervention group with office support (rate ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.19-0.48) and 64% shorter in the intervention group without office support (rate ratio 0.36, 95% CI 0.23-0.59), compared with the control group. The other study used the VroegTijdige Onderkenning Ontwikkelingsstoornissen Language Screening instrument to screen children aged 15 months at enrolment for language delay. It reported no differences between groups in academic performance outcomes at age 8 years.

INTERPRETATION

The evidence on screening for developmental delay in asymptomatic children aged 1-4 years is inconclusive. Further research with longer-term outcomes is needed to inform decisions about screening and screening intervals.

摘要

背景

现有的关于筛查5岁以下儿童发育迟缓的指南各不相同。在这项系统评价中,我们综合了有关筛查1 - 4岁无症状儿童发育迟缓的有效性和危害的文献。

方法

我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase和PsychINFO数据库,查找截至2015年6月16日发表的相关文章。我们纳入了在初级保健机构中对1 - 4岁且无发育迟缓高风险的儿童进行筛查的研究。随机试验和对照队列研究用于评估益处(认知、学业和功能结局);在审查危害时,对研究设计没有限制。

结果

纳入了两项研究。一项研究使用《年龄与阶段问卷第二版》进行筛查,报告称干预组转介至早期干预的人数显著多于对照组(相对风险[RR]为1.95,95%置信区间[CI]为1.49 - 2.54,在有办公室支持的干预组中;RR为1.71,95% CI为1.30 - 2.25,在无办公室支持的干预组中)。与对照组相比,有办公室支持的干预组转介时间缩短了70%(率比为0.30,95% CI为0.19 - 0.48),无办公室支持的干预组转介时间缩短了64%(率比为0.36,95% CI为0.23 - 0.59)。另一项研究使用《早期发育障碍识别语言筛查工具》在儿童入学时对15个月大的儿童进行语言发育迟缓筛查。该研究报告称,两组在8岁时的学业成绩结局方面没有差异。

解读

关于筛查1 - 4岁无症状儿童发育迟缓的证据尚无定论。需要进行更多具有长期结局的研究,为筛查决策和筛查间隔提供依据。