Hooijmans Carlijn R, Geessink Florentine J, Ritskes-Hoitinga Merel, Scheffer Gert Jan
Department of SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
PLoS One. 2016 May 26;11(5):e0156152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156152. eCollection 2016.
Distant metastasis or local recurrence after primary tumour resection remain a major clinical problem. The anaesthetic technique used during oncologic surgery is suggested to influence the metastatic process. While awaiting the results of ongoing randomised controlled trials (RCTs), we have analyzed the evidence regarding the influence of anaesthetic drugs on experimental tumour metastasis in animal studies.
PubMed and Embase were searched until April 21st, 2015. Studies were included in the systematic review when they 1) assessed the effect of an anaesthetic drug used in clinical practice on the number or incidence of metastasis in animal models with experimental cancer, 2) included an appropriate control group, and 3) presented unique data.
20 studies met the inclusion criteria (published between 1958-2010). Data on number of metastases could be retrieved from 17 studies. These studies described 41 independent comparisons, 33 of which could be included in the meta-analysis (MA). The incidence of metastases was studied in 3 unique papers. From these 3 papers, data on 7 independent comparisons could be extracted and included in the MA. Locally administered local anaesthetics appear to decrease the number of metastases (SMD -6.15 [-8.42; -3.88]), whereas general anaesthetics (RD: 0.136 [0.045, 0.226]), and more specifically volatile anaesthetics (SMD 0.54 [0.24; 0.84]), appear to increase the number and risk of metastases in animal models for cancer.
Anaesthetics influence the number and incidence of metastases in experimental cancer models. Although more high quality experimental research is necessary, based on the currently available evidence from animal studies, there is no indication to suggest that locally administered local anaesthetics are harmful during surgery in cancer patients. Volatile anaesthetics, however, might increase metastasis in animal models and clinical trials investigating this possibly harmful effect should receive priority. The results of our systematic review in animal studies are broadly consistent with clinical reports that anaesthetic technique does seem to affect the tumour metastasis process.
原发性肿瘤切除术后的远处转移或局部复发仍是一个主要的临床问题。有研究表明,肿瘤手术中使用的麻醉技术会影响转移过程。在等待正在进行的随机对照试验(RCT)结果的同时,我们分析了动物研究中关于麻醉药物对实验性肿瘤转移影响的证据。
检索截至2015年4月21日的PubMed和Embase数据库。当研究满足以下条件时纳入系统评价:1)评估临床实践中使用的麻醉药物对实验性癌症动物模型转移数量或发生率的影响;2)包含适当的对照组;3)提供独特的数据。
20项研究符合纳入标准(发表于1958年至2010年之间)。17项研究可检索到转移数量的数据。这些研究描述了41项独立比较,其中33项可纳入荟萃分析(MA)。3篇独特的论文研究了转移发生率。从这3篇论文中,可提取7项独立比较的数据并纳入MA。局部应用局部麻醉药似乎可减少转移数量(标准化均数差-6.15[-8.42;-3.88]),而全身麻醉药(风险差:0.136[0.045,0.226]),更具体地说挥发性麻醉药(标准化均数差0.54[0.24;0.84]),似乎会增加癌症动物模型中的转移数量和风险。
麻醉药会影响实验性癌症模型中的转移数量和发生率。尽管需要更多高质量的实验研究,但基于目前动物研究的现有证据,没有迹象表明局部应用局部麻醉药在癌症患者手术期间有害。然而,挥发性麻醉药可能会增加动物模型中的转移,对此可能有害影响进行研究的临床试验应优先开展。我们在动物研究中的系统评价结果与麻醉技术似乎确实会影响肿瘤转移过程的临床报告大致一致。