San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA, United States.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 May 26;4(2):e44. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.5368.
Alcohol and illicit drug use is more prevalent among men who have sex with men (MSM) compared to the general population and has been linked to HIV transmission in this population. Research assessing individual patterns of substance use often utilizes questionnaires or interviews that rely on retrospective self-reported information, which can be subject to recall bias. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) is a set of methods developed to mitigate recall bias by collecting data about subjects' mental states and behaviors on a near real-time basis. EMA remains underutilized in substance use and HIV research.
To assess the concordance between daily reports of substance use collected by EMA text messages (short message service, SMS) and retrospective questionnaires and identify predictors of daily concordance in a sample of MSM.
We conducted a secondary analysis of EMA text responses (regarding behavior on the previous day) and audio computer-assisted self-interview (ACASI) survey data (14-day recall) from June 2013 to September 2014 as part of a randomized controlled trial assessing a pharmacologic intervention to reduce methamphetamine and alcohol use among nondependent MSM in San Francisco, California. Reports of daily methamphetamine use, alcohol use, and binge alcohol use (5 or more drinks on one occasion) were collected via EMA and ACASI and compared using McNemar's tests. Demographic and behavioral correlates of daily concordance between EMA and ACASI were assessed for each substance, using separate multivariable logistic regression models, fit with generalized estimating equations.
Among 30 MSM, a total of 994 days were included in the analysis for methamphetamine use, 987 for alcohol use, and 981 for binge alcohol use. Methamphetamine (EMA 20%, ACASI 11%, P<.001) and alcohol use (EMA 40%, ACASI 35%, P=.001) were reported significantly more frequently via EMA versus ACASI. In multivariable analysis, text reporting of methamphetamine (adjusted odds ratio 0.06, 95% CI 0.04-0.10), alcohol (0.48, 0.33-0.69), and binge alcohol use (0.27, 0.17-0.42) was negatively associated with daily concordance in the reporting of each respective substance. Compared to white participants, African American participants were less likely to have daily concordance in methamphetamine (0.15, 0.05-0.43) and alcohol (0.2, 0.05-0.54) reporting, and other participants of color (ie, Asian, Hispanic, multi-racial) were less likely to have daily concordance in methamphetamine reporting (0.34, 0.12-1.00). College graduates were more likely to have daily concordance in methamphetamine reporting (6.79, 1.84-25.04) compared to those with no college experience.
We found that methamphetamine and alcohol use were reported more frequently with daily EMA texts compared to retrospective ACASI, concordance varied among different racial/ethnic subgroups and education levels, and reported substance use by EMA text was associated with lower daily concordance with retrospective ACASI. These findings suggest that EMA methods may provide more complete reporting of frequent, discrete behaviors such as substance use.
与一般人群相比,男男性行为者(MSM)中更普遍存在饮酒和非法药物使用的情况,并且这种情况与该人群中的 HIV 传播有关。评估物质使用个体模式的研究通常使用问卷或访谈,这些方法依赖于回顾性自我报告信息,这可能会受到回忆偏差的影响。生态瞬时评估(EMA)是一组方法,旨在通过近实时地收集有关受试者心理状态和行为的信息来减轻回忆偏差。EMA 在物质使用和 HIV 研究中仍未得到充分利用。
评估通过 EMA 短信(短消息服务,SMS)收集的日常物质使用报告与回顾性问卷之间的一致性,并确定在 MSM 样本中每日一致性的预测因素。
我们对 2013 年 6 月至 2014 年 9 月期间作为评估减少加利福尼亚州旧金山非依赖 MSM 中甲基苯丙胺和酒精使用的药理学干预措施的随机对照试验的一部分进行了 EMA 文本回复(关于前一天的行为)和音频计算机辅助自我访谈(ACASI)调查数据(14 天回顾)的二次分析。通过 EMA 和 ACASI 收集每日甲基苯丙胺使用、酒精使用和 binge 酒精使用(一次性饮酒 5 杯或以上)的报告,并使用 McNemar 检验进行比较。使用分别使用多变量逻辑回归模型,通过广义估计方程,评估每个物质的 EMA 和 ACASI 之间每日一致性的人口统计学和行为学相关性。
在 30 名 MSM 中,共纳入了 994 天用于甲基苯丙胺使用的分析,987 天用于酒精使用,981 天用于 binge 酒精使用。通过 EMA 报告的甲基苯丙胺(EMA 20%,ACASI 11%,P<.001)和酒精使用(EMA 40%,ACASI 35%,P=.001)的频率明显高于 ACASI。在多变量分析中,甲基苯丙胺(调整后的优势比 0.06,95%置信区间 0.04-0.10)、酒精(0.48,0.33-0.69)和 binge 酒精使用(0.27,0.17-0.42)的文本报告与每种物质的报告每日一致性呈负相关。与白人参与者相比,非裔美国参与者在甲基苯丙胺(0.15,0.05-0.43)和酒精(0.2,0.05-0.54)报告方面不太可能具有每日一致性,而其他有色人种(即亚洲人、西班牙裔、多种族)不太可能在甲基苯丙胺报告方面具有每日一致性(0.34,0.12-1.00)。与没有大学经历的人相比,大学毕业生在甲基苯丙胺报告方面更有可能具有每日一致性(6.79,1.84-25.04)。
我们发现,与回顾性 ACASI 相比,每日 EMA 文本中报告的甲基苯丙胺和酒精使用频率更高,不同种族/族裔亚组和教育水平之间的一致性存在差异,并且通过 EMA 文本报告的物质使用与与回顾性 ACASI 相比,每日一致性较低。这些发现表明,EMA 方法可能会更完整地报告频繁的离散行为,例如物质使用。