• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对参加基础教育课程的社会弱势群体成年人的澳大利亚健康素养培训项目评估:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案

Evaluation of an Australian health literacy training program for socially disadvantaged adults attending basic education classes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.

作者信息

McCaffery Kirsten J, Morony Suzanne, Muscat Danielle M, Smith Sian K, Shepherd Heather L, Dhillon Haryana M, Hayen Andrew, Luxford Karen, Meshreky Wedyan, Comings John, Nutbeam Don

机构信息

Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-based Decision-making (CeMPED), Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2016 May 27;16:454. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3034-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-016-3034-9
PMID:27233237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4884424/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

People with low literacy and low health literacy have poorer health outcomes. Literacy and health literacy are distinct but overlapping constructs that impact wellbeing. Interventions that target both could improve health outcomes.

METHODS/DESIGN: This is a cluster randomised controlled trial with a qualitative component. Participants are 300 adults enrolled in basic language, literacy and numeracy programs at adult education colleges across New South Wales, Australia. Each adult education institute (regional administrative centre) contributes (at least) two classes matched for student demographics, which may be at the same or different campuses. Classes (clusters) are randomly allocated to receive either the health literacy intervention (an 18-week program with health knowledge and skills embedded in language, literacy, and numeracy training (LLN)), or the standard Language Literacy and Numeracy (LLN) program (usual LLN classes, specifically excluding health content). The primary outcome is functional health literacy skills - knowing how to use a thermometer, and read and interpret food and medicine labels. The secondary outcomes are self-reported confidence, more advanced health literacy skills; shared decision making skills, patient activation, health knowledge and self-reported health behaviour. Data is collected at baseline, and immediately and 6 months post intervention. A sample of participating teachers, students, and community health workers will be interviewed in-depth about their experiences with the program to better understand implementation issues and to strengthen the potential for scaling up the program.

DISCUSSION

Outcomes will provide evidence regarding real-world implementation of a health literacy training program with health worker involvement in an Australian adult education setting. The evaluation trial will provide insight into translating and scaling up health literacy education for vulnerable populations with low literacy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12616000213448 .

摘要

背景

文化程度低和健康素养低的人群健康状况较差。文化素养和健康素养是不同但相互重叠的概念,会影响幸福感。针对这两者的干预措施可能会改善健康状况。

方法/设计:这是一项包含定性研究部分的整群随机对照试验。参与者为300名在澳大利亚新南威尔士州成人教育学院参加基础语言、读写和算术课程的成年人。每个成人教育机构(区域行政中心)至少提供两个在学生人口统计学特征上匹配的班级,这些班级可能在同一校区或不同校区。班级(群组)被随机分配接受健康素养干预(一个为期18周的项目,将健康知识和技能融入语言、读写和算术培训(LLN)中),或标准的语言读写和算术(LLN)项目(常规的LLN课程,特别排除健康内容)。主要结果是功能性健康素养技能——知道如何使用温度计,以及阅读和解释食品和药品标签。次要结果是自我报告的信心、更高级的健康素养技能、共同决策技能、患者激活、健康知识和自我报告的健康行为。在基线、干预后立即和干预后6个月收集数据。将对参与的教师、学生和社区卫生工作者进行抽样深入访谈,了解他们参与该项目的经历,以便更好地理解实施问题,并增强扩大该项目规模的潜力。

讨论

研究结果将为在澳大利亚成人教育环境中,有卫生工作者参与的健康素养培训项目的实际实施提供证据。该评估试验将深入了解如何为文化程度低的弱势群体转化和扩大健康素养教育。

试验注册

澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心ACTRN12616000213448 。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74b/4884424/7d870cade274/12889_2016_3034_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74b/4884424/7d870cade274/12889_2016_3034_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d74b/4884424/7d870cade274/12889_2016_3034_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of an Australian health literacy training program for socially disadvantaged adults attending basic education classes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.针对参加基础教育课程的社会弱势群体成年人的澳大利亚健康素养培训项目评估:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 27;16:454. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3034-9.
2
Learners' experience and perceived impact of a health literacy program in adult basic education: a qualitative study.成人基础教育中健康素养项目的学习者体验及感知影响:一项定性研究
Public Health Res Pract. 2020 Jun 30;30(2):29231909. doi: 10.17061/phrp29231909.
3
Skills for Shared Decision-Making: Evaluation of a Health Literacy Program for Consumers with Lower Literacy Levels.共享决策的技能:针对低识字水平消费者的健康素养项目评估
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Oct 3;3(3 Suppl):S58-S74. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190408-02. eCollection 2019 Jul.
4
Evaluation of an Australian Health Literacy Program Delivered in Adult Education Settings.在成人教育环境中开展的澳大利亚健康素养项目评估。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Oct 3;3(3 Suppl):S42-S57. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190402-01. eCollection 2019 Jul.
5
Incorporating health literacy in education for socially disadvantaged adults: an Australian feasibility study.将健康素养纳入社会弱势成年人的教育:一项澳大利亚可行性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jun 4;15:84. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0373-1.
6
Improving health literacy through adult basic education in Australia.通过澳大利亚的成人基础教育提高健康素养。
Health Promot Int. 2018 Oct 1;33(5):867-877. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dax028.
7
Targeting multiple health risk behaviours among vocational education students using electronic feedback and online and telephone support: protocol for a cluster randomised trial.利用电子反馈以及在线和电话支持针对职业教育学生的多种健康风险行为:一项整群随机试验的方案
BMC Public Health. 2015 Jun 13;15:550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-1898-8.
8
An education intervention to improve decision making and health literacy among older Australians: a randomised controlled trial.一项旨在提高澳大利亚老年人决策能力和健康素养的教育干预措施:一项随机对照试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2019 May 7;19(1):129. doi: 10.1186/s12877-019-1143-x.
9
HPV.edu study protocol: a cluster randomised controlled evaluation of education, decisional support and logistical strategies in school-based human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination of adolescents.HPV.edu研究方案:一项关于青少年校内人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗接种中教育、决策支持及后勤策略的整群随机对照评估。
BMC Public Health. 2015 Sep 15;15:896. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2168-5.
10
An education intervention to improve health literacy and decision making about supporting self-care among older Australians: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项旨在提高澳大利亚老年人健康素养及自我护理支持决策能力的教育干预措施:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Sep 26;18(1):441. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2182-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Demographics, health literacy and health locus of control beliefs of Australian women who take complementary medicine products during pregnancy and breastfeeding: A cross-sectional, online, national survey.在孕期和哺乳期服用补充药物的澳大利亚女性的人口统计学特征、健康素养和健康控制信念:一项横断面、在线、全国性调查。
Health Expect. 2022 Apr;25(2):667-683. doi: 10.1111/hex.13414. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
2
Building health literacy system capacity: a framework for health literate systems.构建健康素养体系能力:健康素养体系框架。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Dec 13;36(Supplement_1):i13-i23. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daab153.
3
Oral Health Profiling for Young and Older Adults: A Descriptive Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Incorporating health literacy in education for socially disadvantaged adults: an Australian feasibility study.将健康素养纳入社会弱势成年人的教育:一项澳大利亚可行性研究。
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jun 4;15:84. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0373-1.
2
Can consumers learn to ask three questions to improve shared decision making? A feasibility study of the ASK (AskShareKnow) Patient-Clinician Communication Model(®) intervention in a primary health-care setting.消费者能否学会提出三个问题以改善共同决策?在初级卫生保健环境中对ASK(询问、分享、知晓)医患沟通模型(®)干预措施的可行性研究。
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1160-8. doi: 10.1111/hex.12409. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
3
口腔健康分析:年轻人和老年人。描述性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 27;18(17):9033. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179033.
4
Increasing Health Literacy May Reduce Health Inequalities: Evidence from a National Population Survey in Ireland.提高健康素养可能会减少健康不平等:来自爱尔兰全国人口调查的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 13;17(16):5891. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165891.
5
Embedding a Health Literacy Intervention Within Established Parenting Groups: An Australian Feasibility Study.将健康素养干预融入既有育儿群体:一项澳大利亚可行性研究。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 Mar 10;4(1):e67-e78. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20200217-01.
6
Family Health in Adult Education: A Missing Piece of the Health Literacy Puzzle.成人教育中的家庭健康:健康素养难题中缺失的一环。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Oct 3;3(3 Suppl):S75-S78. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190624-03. eCollection 2019 Jul.
7
Skills for Shared Decision-Making: Evaluation of a Health Literacy Program for Consumers with Lower Literacy Levels.共享决策的技能:针对低识字水平消费者的健康素养项目评估
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Oct 3;3(3 Suppl):S58-S74. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190408-02. eCollection 2019 Jul.
8
Evaluation of an Australian Health Literacy Program Delivered in Adult Education Settings.在成人教育环境中开展的澳大利亚健康素养项目评估。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2019 Oct 3;3(3 Suppl):S42-S57. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20190402-01. eCollection 2019 Jul.
9
Implementation of the three good questions-A feasibility study in Dutch hospital departments.三问法的实施——荷兰医院科室的可行性研究。
Health Expect. 2019 Dec;22(6):1272-1284. doi: 10.1111/hex.12960. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
10
Developing Verbal Health Literacy with Adult Learners Through Training in Shared Decision-Making.通过共同决策培训提高成年学习者的语言健康素养
Health Lit Res Pract. 2017 Dec 11;1(4):e257-e268. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20171208-02. eCollection 2017 Oct.
Development and field testing of a consumer shared decision-making training program for adults with low literacy.
针对低识字水平成年人的消费者共同决策培训项目的开发与现场测试。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1180-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.07.023. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
4
The Health Literacy and ESL study: a community-based intervention for Spanish-speaking adults.健康素养与英语作为第二语言研究:一项针对讲西班牙语成年人的社区干预措施。
J Health Commun. 2015 Apr;20(4):369-76. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2014.965368. Epub 2015 Jan 20.
5
Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.证据何在?共享决策制定与患者预后的系统评价。
Med Decis Making. 2015 Jan;35(1):114-31. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551638. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
6
Shared decision making: what do clinicians need to know and why should they bother?共同决策:临床医生需要了解什么,为什么他们应该关注?
Med J Aust. 2014 Jul 7;201(1):35-9. doi: 10.5694/mja14.00002.
7
Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids.解决患者决策辅助工具中的健康素养问题。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S10. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S2-S10. Epub 2013 Nov 29.
8
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临健康治疗或筛查决策的人群提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 28(1):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.
9
Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: new concepts are needed to study research participation effects.系统综述霍桑效应:需要新的概念来研究研究参与效应。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar;67(3):267-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
10
The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ).健康素养问卷(HLQ)的基础心理测量学发展和初步验证。
BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 16;13:658. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-658.