Kang Chang Hyun, Hwang Yoohwa, Lee Hyun Joo, Park In Kyu, Kim Young Tae
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Sep;102(3):895-901. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.084. Epub 2016 May 25.
Robot-assisted thymectomy (RT) has been increasingly performed for treating anterior mediastinal masses. The aim of this study was to compare the early and long-term outcomes between RT and transsternal thymectomy (ST).
A total of 429 patients who underwent surgical resection of anterior mediastinal masses were included in this study. RT was performed in 117 patients (27%). Propensity score matching was performed between RT and ST, and 100 patients were selected for each group.
RT and ST were performed for anterior mediastinal masses, including thymic epithelial tumor and mediastinal cysts. Thymic epithelial tumor was the most common type of tumor, and distribution of pathologic stages was not significantly different between RT and ST (41% versus 39% in stage I, 46% versus 50% in stage II, 9% versus 5% in stage III, and 4% versus 5% in stage IV, p = 0.96). The RT group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss (100.9 ± 105.4 mL versus 354.5 ± 412.4 mL, p < 0.001), lower incidence of postoperative complication (1% versus 12%, p = 0.002), and shorter length of postoperative hospital stay (2.5 ± 1.2 days versus 6.4 ± 6.6 days, p < 0.001) compared with the ST group. Three-year overall survival rates and freedom from recurrence were not significantly different (100% versus 100%; p = 0.88 and 92% versus 99%, p = 0.12) between RT and ST.
RT demonstrated excellent early outcomes compared with ST, and RT could also achieve comparable long-term oncologic outcomes with ST in thymic epithelial tumor. Therefore, RT should be considered as an alternative surgical option for treating anterior mediastinal masses.
机器人辅助胸腺切除术(RT)在治疗前纵隔肿物方面的应用日益增多。本研究旨在比较RT与经胸骨胸腺切除术(ST)的早期和长期疗效。
本研究共纳入429例行前纵隔肿物手术切除的患者。117例患者(27%)接受了RT。对RT组和ST组进行倾向评分匹配,每组各选取100例患者。
RT和ST均用于治疗前纵隔肿物,包括胸腺上皮肿瘤和纵隔囊肿。胸腺上皮肿瘤是最常见的肿瘤类型,RT组和ST组的病理分期分布无显著差异(Ⅰ期分别为41%和39%,Ⅱ期分别为46%和50%,Ⅲ期分别为9%和5%,Ⅳ期分别为4%和5%,p = 0.96)。与ST组相比,RT组术中出血量显著更少(100.9±105.4 mL对354.5±412.4 mL,p < 0.001),术后并发症发生率更低(1%对12%,p = 0.002),术后住院时间更短(2.5±1.2天对6.4±6.6天,p < 0.001)。RT组和ST组的三年总生存率和无复发生存率无显著差异(100%对100%;p = 0.88,92%对99%,p = 0.12)。
与ST相比,RT显示出良好的早期疗效,并且在胸腺上皮肿瘤方面RT也能取得与ST相当的长期肿瘤学疗效。因此,RT应被视为治疗前纵隔肿物的一种替代手术选择。