• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三孔充气式机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔肿瘤的临床效果。

Clinical efficiency of three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection.

机构信息

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, PR China.

Department of Medical Oncology, Jinling Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, 305 East Zhongshan Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, PR China.

出版信息

World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar 25;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03357-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12957-024-03357-x
PMID:38523264
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10962077/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Aimed to assess clinical effect of three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection by comparing results of the robot group with the video group.

METHODS

Retrospectively analyze 179 patients diagnosed with anterior mediastinal tumor from May 2017 to August 2021. Two groups were divided according to the surgical approach, including 92 cases in the RATS group and 87 cases in the VATS group. The results were analyzed between two groups with variables of age, sex, BMI, tumor size, and diagnosis. Perioperative clinical data was gathered to compare.

RESULT

There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regards to demographic data and clinical features. There were no significant differences inoperative time and duration of chest tube via RATS vs. VATS. The intraoperative blood loss was statistically significantly different among the RATS and VATS groups (75.9 ± 39.6 vs. 97.4 ± 35.8 ml p = 0.042). The postoperative stay of patients in RATS group were significantly shorter than that in VATS group (2.3 ± 1.0 vs. 3.4 ± 1.4 day p = 0.035), CONCLUSION: Three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal tumor is feasible and reliable it is more advantageous, and it provides the surgeon with advice on treatment choice.

摘要

背景

旨在通过比较机器人组和视频组的结果,评估三孔充气式机器人辅助胸腔镜手术在纵隔肿瘤切除中的临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析 2017 年 5 月至 2021 年 8 月期间诊断为前纵隔肿瘤的 179 例患者。根据手术方式将两组分为 92 例 RATS 组和 87 例 VATS 组。对两组的年龄、性别、BMI、肿瘤大小和诊断等变量进行分析。收集围手术期临床资料进行比较。

结果

两组在人口统计学数据和临床特征方面无显著差异。RATS 与 VATS 相比,手术时间和胸腔引流管时间无显著差异。RATS 组与 VATS 组术中出血量有统计学差异(75.9±39.6 比 97.4±35.8 ml,p=0.042)。RATS 组患者的术后住院时间明显短于 VATS 组(2.3±1.0 比 3.4±1.4 天,p=0.035)。

结论

三孔充气式机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔肿瘤是可行且可靠的,它具有更多优势,并为外科医生提供治疗选择的建议。

相似文献

1
Clinical efficiency of three-port inflatable robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in mediastinal tumor resection.三孔充气式机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔肿瘤的临床效果。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar 25;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03357-x.
2
Efficacy of the da Vinci robot versus thoracoscopic surgery for patients with mediastinal tumors of different body mass index: a multicenter propensity score-matched study.达芬奇机器人手术与胸腔镜手术治疗不同体质量指数纵隔肿瘤患者的疗效:一项多中心倾向评分匹配研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Sep 28;22(1):257. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03542-y.
3
Advantages of robot-assisted resection of large mediastinal tumors: a single-center preliminary study.机器人辅助切除大型纵隔肿瘤的优势:单中心初步研究。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 2;18(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01958-y.
4
Outcomes of robot-assisted versus video-assisted mediastinal mass resection during the initial learning curve.机器人辅助与视频辅助纵隔肿块切除在初始学习曲线期间的结果。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Feb 17;18(1):81. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01828-7.
5
[A comparative study of Da Vinci robot system with video-assisted thoracoscopy in the surgical treatment of mediastinal lesions].达芬奇机器人系统与电视辅助胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔病变的对比研究
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi. 2014 Jul 20;17(7):557-62. doi: 10.3779/j.issn.1009-3419.2014.07.11.
6
Clinical results of surgical resection of mediastinal teratoma: efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery.纵隔畸胎瘤手术切除的临床结果:电视辅助胸腔镜手术的疗效
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4065-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4721-9. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
7
Meta-analysis of clinical efficacy of thoracoscopy and robotic surgery in the treatment of mediastinal tumors.胸腔镜与机器人手术治疗纵隔肿瘤的临床疗效的荟萃分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2024 Feb 28;22(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12957-024-03325-5.
8
Robot-assisted single-port surgery for mediastinal tumors.机器人辅助单孔手术治疗纵隔肿瘤
Surg Today. 2019 Jan;49(1):96-98. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1722-z. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
9
A comparison of three-port and four-port Da Vinci robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for lung cancer: a retrospective study.三孔与四孔达芬奇机器人辅助胸腔镜肺癌根治术的比较:一项回顾性研究。
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2024 Jun 26;19(1):377. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-02920-7.
10
A comparative study of robotic surgery and thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal cysts.机器人手术与胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔囊肿的对比研究。
BMC Surg. 2023 Apr 28;23(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-01994-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Robotic resection of mediastinal tumors: surgical approach and procedure.纵隔肿瘤的机器人切除术:手术入路与操作步骤
BMC Surg. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12893-025-02843-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic thymectomy for myasthenia gravis surgical techniques and outcomes.用于重症肌无力的机器人胸腺切除术:手术技术与结果
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Oct;13(10):6187-6194. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2019-rts-10.
2
Robot-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for mediastinal masses: a single-institution experience.机器人辅助胸腔镜手术治疗纵隔肿物:单机构经验
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Feb;12(2):105-113. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.08.105.
3
A systematic review of robotic versus open and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches for thymectomy.一项关于机器人辅助与开放及电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)胸腺切除术方法的系统评价。
Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 Mar;8(2):174-193. doi: 10.21037/acs.2019.02.04.
4
Efficacy and Safety of Robot-assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) Compare with Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery (VATS) for Lung Lobectomy in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.机器人辅助胸外科手术(RATS)与电视辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)用于非小细胞肺癌患者肺叶切除的疗效及安全性比较
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen. 2019;22(3):169-178. doi: 10.2174/1386207322666190411113040.
5
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus open surgery for Stage I thymic epithelial tumours: a propensity score-matched study.胸腔镜手术与开放手术治疗Ⅰ期胸腺癌:倾向评分匹配研究。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Dec 1;54(6):1037-1044. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy239.
6
Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Versus Robotic-Assisted Thoracoscopic Thymectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.电视辅助胸腔镜与机器人辅助胸腔镜胸腺切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
Innovations (Phila). 2017 Jul/Aug;12(4):259-264. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000382.
7
Robotic Thymectomy in Anterior Mediastinal Mass: Propensity Score Matching Study With Transsternal Thymectomy.前纵隔肿物的机器人胸腺切除术:与经胸骨胸腺切除术的倾向评分匹配研究
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Sep;102(3):895-901. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.03.084. Epub 2016 May 25.
8
Surgical management of cervico-mediastinal goiters: Our experience and review of the literature.颈纵隔巨大甲状腺肿的外科治疗:我们的经验和文献复习。
Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28 Suppl 1:S47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.048. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
9
Clinical results of surgical resection of mediastinal teratoma: efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery.纵隔畸胎瘤手术切除的临床结果:电视辅助胸腔镜手术的疗效
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):4065-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4721-9. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
10
A study of clinical characteristicsof mediastinal mass.纵隔肿块的临床特征研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Feb;8(2):77-80. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/7622.4013. Epub 2014 Feb 3.