Mood Carina, Jonsson Jan O
Institute for Futures Studies, Box 591, 101 31 Stockholm, Sweden ; Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Institute for Futures Studies, Box 591, 101 31 Stockholm, Sweden ; Swedish Institute for Social Research (SOFI), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden ; Nuffield College, OX1 1NF Oxford, England, UK.
Soc Indic Res. 2016;127:633-652. doi: 10.1007/s11205-015-0983-9. Epub 2015 May 17.
Poverty is commonly defined as a lack of economic resources that has negative social consequences, but surprisingly little is known about the importance of economic hardship for social outcomes. This article offers an empirical investigation into this issue. We apply panel data methods on longitudinal data from the Swedish Level-of-Living Survey 2000 and 2010 (n = 3089) to study whether poverty affects four social outcomes-close social relations (social support), other social relations (friends and relatives), political participation, and activity in organizations. We also compare these effects across five different poverty indicators. Our main conclusion is that poverty in general has negative effects on social life. It has more harmful effects for relations with friends and relatives than for social support; and more for political participation than organizational activity. The poverty indicator that shows the greatest impact is material deprivation (lack of cash margin), while the most prevalent poverty indicators-absolute income poverty, and especially relative income poverty-appear to have the least effect on social outcomes.
贫困通常被定义为缺乏经济资源并产生负面社会后果,但令人惊讶的是,对于经济困难对社会结果的重要性,人们知之甚少。本文对这一问题进行了实证研究。我们运用面板数据方法,对2000年和2010年瑞典生活水平调查的纵向数据(n = 3089)进行分析,以研究贫困是否会影响四种社会结果——亲密社会关系(社会支持)、其他社会关系(朋友和亲戚)、政治参与以及组织活动。我们还比较了五种不同贫困指标的这些影响。我们的主要结论是,总体而言,贫困对社会生活有负面影响。它对与朋友和亲戚的关系的危害比对社会支持的危害更大;对政治参与的危害比对组织活动的危害更大。显示出最大影响的贫困指标是物质匮乏(缺乏现金结余),而最普遍的贫困指标——绝对收入贫困,尤其是相对收入贫困——似乎对社会结果的影响最小。