Frobeen Anna L, Kowalski Christoph, Weiß Verena, Pfaff Holger
IMVR - Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science at the Faculty of Human Sciences and the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
IMSIE - Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Breast Care (Basel). 2016 Apr;11(2):139-43. doi: 10.1159/000446015. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
Collecting patient-reported data via postal questionnaires is a common and frequently used technique. Selection bias may occur through lost data from nonrespondents. This study investigated differences in characteristics between respondents and nonrespondents of a postal breast cancer survey.
The investigation was based on a cross-sectional postal questionnaire survey for the mandatory annual routine (re-)certification of accredited breast centers in North Rhine-Westphalia in 2010. Out of 4,444 patients meeting the inclusion criteria who gave their consent to participate, 3,856 respondents sent back a questionnaire and 588 nonrespondents did not. Using logistic regression, differences between respondents and nonrespondents regarding information gathered through hospital staff concerning age, affected breast, UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) staging and grading, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and type of surgery were assessed.
Very young and very old patients sent back their questionnaire significantly less frequently, as did patients who showed a later cancer stage and poorer general health and those who underwent mastectomy.
Differences exist between respondents and nonrespondents with regard to age, disease, and therapy characteristics that need to be considered for the interpretation and generalizability of survey results due to selection bias.
通过邮寄问卷收集患者报告的数据是一种常见且常用的技术。未回复者的数据缺失可能会导致选择偏倚。本研究调查了乳腺癌邮寄调查中回复者与未回复者在特征上的差异。
该调查基于2010年北莱茵-威斯特法伦州认可的乳腺中心强制性年度常规(重新)认证的横断面邮寄问卷调查。在4444名符合纳入标准并同意参与的患者中,3856名回复者寄回了问卷,588名未回复者未寄回。使用逻辑回归分析,评估了回复者与未回复者在通过医院工作人员收集的关于年龄、患侧乳房、国际癌症控制联盟(UICC)分期和分级、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类、新辅助化疗以及手术类型等信息方面的差异。
非常年轻和非常年老的患者寄回问卷的频率明显较低,癌症分期较晚、总体健康状况较差以及接受乳房切除术的患者也是如此。
由于选择偏倚,回复者与未回复者在年龄、疾病和治疗特征方面存在差异,在解释调查结果及其普遍性时需要考虑这些差异。