• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Investigating Respondents and Nonrespondents of a Postal Breast Cancer Questionnaire Survey Regarding Differences in Age, Medical Conditions, and Therapy.调查关于年龄、医疗状况和治疗差异的邮政乳腺癌问卷调查的应答者和非应答者。
Breast Care (Basel). 2016 Apr;11(2):139-43. doi: 10.1159/000446015. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
2
Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost.以纸质问卷或网络问卷邀请作为数据收集方法:应答率、数据完整性和财务成本差异的横断面比较研究
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Jan 23;20(1):e24. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8353.
3
Characteristics of accelerometry respondents to a mail-based surveillance study.基于邮件的监测研究中使用加速度计的应答者特征。
J Epidemiol. 2010;20(6):446-52. doi: 10.2188/jea.je20100062. Epub 2010 Sep 18.
4
Refusal and information bias associated with postal questionnaires and face-to-face interviews in very elderly subjects.与老年受试者通过邮寄问卷和面对面访谈相关的拒绝和信息偏差。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;49(3):373-81. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(95)00527-7.
5
Participation in a mail survey: role of repeated mailings and characteristics of nonrespondents among recent mothers.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;13(2):218-33. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1999.00176.x.
6
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
7
Ten Years of Patient Surveys in Accredited Breast Centers in North Rhine-Westphalia.北莱茵-威斯特法伦州认证乳腺中心的十年患者调查
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2016 Jan;76(1):37-45. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111572.
8
Respondents in an epidemiologic survey had fewer psychotropic prescriptions than nonrespondents: an insight into health-related selection bias using routine health insurance data.在流行病学调查中,应答者比未应答者的精神类药物处方更少:利用常规健康保险数据洞察与健康相关的选择偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Nov;65(11):1181-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.05.002. Epub 2012 Aug 18.
9
A national survey of U.S. pharmacists in 2000: assessing nonresponse bias of a survey methodology.2000年美国药剂师全国性调查:评估一种调查方法的无应答偏差。
AAPS PharmSci. 2001;3(4):E33. doi: 10.1208/ps030433.
10
The effect of nonresponse on prevalence estimates for a referent population: insights from a population-based cohort study. Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators.无应答对参考人群患病率估计值的影响:基于人群队列研究的见解。社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究调查人员。
Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Nov;6(6):498-506. doi: 10.1016/s1047-2797(96)00104-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The psychological impacts of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction: a systematic review.乳房切除术后乳房重建的心理影响:一项系统综述
Ann Breast Surg. 2024 Jun 30;8. doi: 10.21037/abs-23-33. Epub 2023 Nov 10.
2
Positive and negative influences of social participation on physical and mental health among community-dwelling elderly aged 65-70 years: a cross-sectional study in Japan.社会参与对65-70岁社区居住老年人身心健康的正负影响:日本的一项横断面研究
BMC Geriatr. 2017 May 19;17(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0502-8.

本文引用的文献

1
What is wrong with non-respondents? Alcohol-, drug- and smoking-related mortality and morbidity in a 12-year follow-up study of respondents and non-respondents in the Danish Health and Morbidity Survey.无应答者存在什么问题?在丹麦健康与发病率调查中对应答者和无应答者进行的一项为期12年的随访研究中与酒精、药物和吸烟相关的死亡率和发病率。
Addiction. 2015 Sep;110(9):1505-12. doi: 10.1111/add.12939. Epub 2015 Jun 2.
2
Limitations and sources of bias in clinical knee cartilage research.临床膝关节软骨研究的局限性和偏倚来源。
Arthroscopy. 2012 Sep;28(9):1315-25. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.02.022. Epub 2012 May 23.
3
Response rates and nonresponse errors in surveys.调查中的回应率和无回应误差。
JAMA. 2012 May 2;307(17):1805-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.3532.
4
Register-based data indicated nonparticipation bias in a health study among aging people.基于登记的数据分析表明,在一项针对老年人的健康研究中存在不参与偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
5
Marital status, educational level and household income explain part of the excess mortality of survey non-respondents.婚姻状况、受教育程度和家庭收入部分解释了调查未应答者的超额死亡率。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;25(2):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10654-009-9389-9. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
6
Lymphedema and quality of life in breast cancer survivors: the Iowa Women's Health Study.乳腺癌幸存者的淋巴水肿与生活质量:爱荷华州女性健康研究
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5689-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.4731. Epub 2008 Nov 10.
7
Prolonged recruitment efforts in health surveys: effects on response, costs, and potential bias.健康调查中延长招募工作时间:对应答率、成本及潜在偏倚的影响。
Epidemiology. 2006 Nov;17(6):639-43. doi: 10.1097/01.ede.0000239731.86975.7f.
8
25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey.应答率的25年趋势及社会人口学差异:芬兰成人健康行为调查
Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(6):409-15. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9019-8. Epub 2006 Jun 28.
9
Use of health-related, quality-of-life metrics to predict mortality and hospitalizations in community-dwelling seniors.使用与健康相关的生活质量指标预测社区居住老年人的死亡率和住院率。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Apr;54(4):667-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00681.x.
10
Effect on trend estimates of the difference between survey respondents and non-respondents: results from 27 populations in the WHO MONICA Project.调查受访者与未受访者之间差异对趋势估计的影响:世界卫生组织莫尼卡项目中27个群体的结果
Eur J Epidemiol. 2005;20(11):887-98. doi: 10.1007/s10654-005-2672-5.

调查关于年龄、医疗状况和治疗差异的邮政乳腺癌问卷调查的应答者和非应答者。

Investigating Respondents and Nonrespondents of a Postal Breast Cancer Questionnaire Survey Regarding Differences in Age, Medical Conditions, and Therapy.

作者信息

Frobeen Anna L, Kowalski Christoph, Weiß Verena, Pfaff Holger

机构信息

IMVR - Institute of Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science at the Faculty of Human Sciences and the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

IMSIE - Institute of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Epidemiology of the University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

出版信息

Breast Care (Basel). 2016 Apr;11(2):139-43. doi: 10.1159/000446015. Epub 2016 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1159/000446015
PMID:27239177
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4881251/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Collecting patient-reported data via postal questionnaires is a common and frequently used technique. Selection bias may occur through lost data from nonrespondents. This study investigated differences in characteristics between respondents and nonrespondents of a postal breast cancer survey.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The investigation was based on a cross-sectional postal questionnaire survey for the mandatory annual routine (re-)certification of accredited breast centers in North Rhine-Westphalia in 2010. Out of 4,444 patients meeting the inclusion criteria who gave their consent to participate, 3,856 respondents sent back a questionnaire and 588 nonrespondents did not. Using logistic regression, differences between respondents and nonrespondents regarding information gathered through hospital staff concerning age, affected breast, UICC (Union for International Cancer Control) staging and grading, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) classification, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and type of surgery were assessed.

RESULTS

Very young and very old patients sent back their questionnaire significantly less frequently, as did patients who showed a later cancer stage and poorer general health and those who underwent mastectomy.

CONCLUSION

Differences exist between respondents and nonrespondents with regard to age, disease, and therapy characteristics that need to be considered for the interpretation and generalizability of survey results due to selection bias.

摘要

背景

通过邮寄问卷收集患者报告的数据是一种常见且常用的技术。未回复者的数据缺失可能会导致选择偏倚。本研究调查了乳腺癌邮寄调查中回复者与未回复者在特征上的差异。

患者与方法

该调查基于2010年北莱茵-威斯特法伦州认可的乳腺中心强制性年度常规(重新)认证的横断面邮寄问卷调查。在4444名符合纳入标准并同意参与的患者中,3856名回复者寄回了问卷,588名未回复者未寄回。使用逻辑回归分析,评估了回复者与未回复者在通过医院工作人员收集的关于年龄、患侧乳房、国际癌症控制联盟(UICC)分期和分级、美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)分类、新辅助化疗以及手术类型等信息方面的差异。

结果

非常年轻和非常年老的患者寄回问卷的频率明显较低,癌症分期较晚、总体健康状况较差以及接受乳房切除术的患者也是如此。

结论

由于选择偏倚,回复者与未回复者在年龄、疾病和治疗特征方面存在差异,在解释调查结果及其普遍性时需要考虑这些差异。