• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂治疗儿童和青少年重度抑郁症的随机对照试验:疗效与可接受性的荟萃分析

Randomized controlled trials of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor in treating major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.

作者信息

Xu Y, Bai S J, Lan X H, Qin B, Huang T, Xie P

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Yongchuan Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Neurobiology, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016 May 24;49(6). doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20164806.

DOI:10.1590/1414-431X20164806
PMID:27240293
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4897997/
Abstract

New generation antidepressant therapies, including serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRIs), were introduced in the late 1980s; however, few comprehensive studies have compared the benefits and risks of various contemporary treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) in young patients. A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases was conducted from 1970 to January 2015. Only clinical trials that randomly assigned one SNRI or placebo to patients aged 7 to 18 years who met the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder were included. Treatment success, dropout rate, and suicidal ideation/attempt outcomes were measured. Primary efficacy was determined by pooling the risk ratios (RRs) of treatment response and remission. Acceptability was determined by pooling the RRs of dropouts for all reasons and for adverse effects as well as suicide-risk outcomes. Five trials with a total of 973 patients were included. SNRIs were not significantly more effective than placebo for treatment response but were for remission. The comparison of patients taking SNRIs that dropped out for all reasons and those taking placebo did not reach statistical significance. Significantly more patients taking SNRIs dropped out for adverse effects than those taking placebo. No significant difference was found in suicide-related risk outcomes. SNRI therapy does not display a superior efficacy and is not better tolerated compared to placebo in these young patients. However, duloxetine has a potential beneficial effect for depression in young populations, showing a need for further research.

摘要

新一代抗抑郁疗法,包括5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs),于20世纪80年代末问世;然而,很少有全面的研究比较过各种当代疗法对年轻患者重性抑郁障碍(MDD)的利弊。我们对1970年至2015年1月期间的PubMed、Cochrane、Embase、科学网和PsycINFO数据库进行了全面的文献检索。仅纳入了将一种SNRI或安慰剂随机分配给符合重性抑郁障碍诊断标准的7至18岁患者的临床试验。测量了治疗成功率、脱落率以及自杀意念/企图结果。主要疗效通过汇总治疗反应和缓解的风险比(RRs)来确定。可接受性通过汇总因各种原因、不良反应以及自杀风险结果导致的脱落RRs来确定。共纳入了五项试验,涉及973名患者。在治疗反应方面,SNRIs并不比安慰剂显著更有效,但在缓解方面则不然。将因各种原因退出的服用SNRIs的患者与服用安慰剂的患者进行比较,未达到统计学显著性。因不良反应而退出的服用SNRIs的患者明显多于服用安慰剂的患者。在自杀相关风险结果方面未发现显著差异。在这些年轻患者中,与安慰剂相比,SNRI疗法并未显示出更优的疗效,耐受性也没有更好。然而,度洛西汀对年轻人群的抑郁症可能有有益作用,这表明有必要进行进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d12/4897997/fb8f47e6ea2a/1414-431X-bjmbr-1414-431X20164806-gf003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d12/4897997/01a4999fa75a/1414-431X-bjmbr-1414-431X20164806-gf001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d12/4897997/02a8a7ba8adc/1414-431X-bjmbr-1414-431X20164806-gf002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d12/4897997/fb8f47e6ea2a/1414-431X-bjmbr-1414-431X20164806-gf003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d12/4897997/01a4999fa75a/1414-431X-bjmbr-1414-431X20164806-gf001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d12/4897997/02a8a7ba8adc/1414-431X-bjmbr-1414-431X20164806-gf002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d12/4897997/fb8f47e6ea2a/1414-431X-bjmbr-1414-431X20164806-gf003.jpg

相似文献

1
Randomized controlled trials of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor in treating major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis of efficacy and acceptability.5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂治疗儿童和青少年重度抑郁症的随机对照试验:疗效与可接受性的荟萃分析
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2016 May 24;49(6). doi: 10.1590/1414-431X20164806.
2
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.新一代抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD013674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2.
3
Vortioxetine for depression in adults.伏硫西汀用于成人抑郁症治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2.
4
Comparative efficacy, acceptability, and safety of medicinal, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and placebo treatments for acute major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis.药物治疗、认知行为疗法及安慰剂治疗对儿童和青少年急性重度抑郁症的疗效、可接受性及安全性比较:一项多治疗组元分析。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2014 Jun;30(6):971-95. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2013.860020. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
5
Comparison of agomelatine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors in major depressive disorder: A meta-analysis of head-to-head randomized clinical trials.阿戈美拉汀与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂/5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂治疗重度抑郁症的比较:一项头对头随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Jul;48(7):663-71. doi: 10.1177/0004867414525837. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
6
[Economic evaluation of desvenlafaxine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in Spain].[度洛西汀治疗西班牙重度抑郁症的经济学评估]
Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment. 2016 Apr-Jun;9(2):87-96. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
7
[The efficacy of esketamine in resistant major depressive disorder: A systematic review of the literature].艾司氯胺酮治疗难治性重度抑郁症的疗效:文献系统评价
Encephale. 2022 Aug;48(4):455-461. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.12.002. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
8
Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors and the Risk of AKI: A Cohort Study of Eight Administrative Databases and Meta-Analysis.血清素-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂与急性肾损伤风险:八项行政数据库队列研究及荟萃分析
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Oct 7;10(10):1716-22. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11271114. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
9
Antidepressants for the treatment of adults with major depressive disorder in the maintenance phase: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药治疗成人重性抑郁障碍维持期:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Mol Psychiatry. 2023 Jan;28(1):402-409. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01824-z. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
10
Withdrawal Symptoms after Serotonin-Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitor Discontinuation: Systematic Review.SSRIs 停药后出现的戒断症状:系统评价。
Psychother Psychosom. 2018;87(4):195-203. doi: 10.1159/000491524. Epub 2018 Jul 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The comparative effectiveness of antidepressants for youths with major depressive disorder: a nationwide population-based study in Taiwan.抗抑郁药对患有重度抑郁症青少年的比较疗效:台湾一项基于全国人口的研究。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 May 22;13:20406223221098114. doi: 10.1177/20406223221098114. eCollection 2022.
2
Improving Suicide Prevention Through Evidence-Based Strategies: A Systematic Review.通过循证策略改善自杀预防:系统评价。
Am J Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;178(7):611-624. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20060864. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
Antidepressants for depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a database of randomised controlled trials.

本文引用的文献

1
A double-blind efficacy and safety study of duloxetine fixed doses in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder.度洛西汀固定剂量治疗儿童和青少年重度抑郁症的双盲疗效与安全性研究。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014 May;24(4):170-9. doi: 10.1089/cap.2013.0096. Epub 2014 May 9.
2
A double-blind efficacy and safety study of duloxetine flexible dosing in children and adolescents with major depressive disorder.度洛西汀灵活给药治疗儿童和青少年重度抑郁症的双盲疗效与安全性研究。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2014 May;24(4):180-9. doi: 10.1089/cap.2013.0146. Epub 2014 May 9.
3
Efficacy and safety of duloxetine 60 mg once daily in major depressive disorder: a review with expert commentary.
抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症的随机对照试验数据库。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 May 31;18(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1749-0.
4
Efficacy, acceptability, and tolerability of antidepressant treatments for patients with post-stroke depression: a network meta-analysis.中风后抑郁症患者抗抑郁治疗的疗效、可接受性和耐受性:一项网状Meta分析。
Braz J Med Biol Res. 2018;51(7):e7218. doi: 10.1590/1414-431x20187218. Epub 2018 May 7.
度洛西汀每日一次60毫克治疗重度抑郁症的疗效与安全性:专家评论综述
Drugs Context. 2013 Jan 3;2013:212245. doi: 10.7573/dic.212245.
4
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience.停电:为什么小样本量会破坏神经科学的可靠性。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2013 May;14(5):365-76. doi: 10.1038/nrn3475. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
5
Newer generation antidepressants for depressive disorders in children and adolescents.用于儿童和青少年抑郁症的新一代抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD004851. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004851.pub3.
6
Venlafaxine ER for the treatment of pediatric subjects with depression: results of two placebo-controlled trials.缓释文拉法辛治疗儿童抑郁症患者:两项安慰剂对照试验的结果
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Apr;46(4):479-488. doi: 10.1097/chi.0b013e31802f5f03.
7
Is there an epidemic of child or adolescent depression?儿童或青少年抑郁症正在流行吗?
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;47(12):1263-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01682.x.
8
Suicidal behaviour in youths with depression treated with new-generation antidepressants: meta-analysis.新一代抗抑郁药治疗的青少年抑郁症患者的自杀行为:荟萃分析
Br J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov;189:393-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.105.011833.
9
Improved variance estimation of classification performance via reduction of bias caused by small sample size.通过减少小样本量导致的偏差来改进分类性能的方差估计。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Mar 13;7:127. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-127.
10
Suicidality in pediatric patients treated with antidepressant drugs.接受抗抑郁药物治疗的儿科患者的自杀倾向。
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;63(3):332-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.3.332.