DiFrancesca K R, Meloy J R
Mental Health Division, San Diego County Department of Health Services, San Diego, CA. 92101.
J Pers Assess. 1989 Summer;53(2):396. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5302_15.
We studied the thought and affective disturbance of Megargee and Bohn's (1979) most psychopathological Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) subtypes, the "How" and "Charlie" profiles. 75 subjects, consisting of three groups of How and Charlie subtypes in inpatient and outpatient forensic settings and two control groups, are tested using the Whitaker Index of Schizophrenic Thinking (WIST) and Profile of Mood States (POMS). Results indicate both How and Charlie subtypes have mild formal thought disorder, with the former showing greater variance of thought disorder. Charlie subtypes, however, are more angry, less depressed, more vigorous, and more constricted and defensive than the How subtypes. We conclude that the How subtype needs further actuarial refinement to be diagnostically useful.
我们研究了梅加吉和博恩（1979年）所提出的明尼苏达多相人格调查表（MMPI）中最具精神病理学特征的“豪”型和“查理”型这两种亚型的思维及情感障碍。研究对75名受试者进行了测试，他们分为三组，分别是住院和门诊法医环境中的“豪”型和“查理”型亚型，还有两个对照组，测试使用了惠特克精神分裂症思维指数（WIST）和情绪状态剖面图（POMS）。结果表明，“豪”型和“查理”型亚型均有轻度的形式思维障碍，前者的思维障碍差异更大。然而，“查理”型亚型比“豪”型亚型更易怒、更少抑郁、更有活力，也更受限制和更具防御性。我们得出结论，“豪”型亚型需要进一步精确统计分析才能在诊断中发挥作用。
