Suppr超能文献

明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)“How”型与“Charlie”型亚型的比较临床研究

A comparative clinical investigation of the "How" and "Charlie" MMPI subtypes.

作者信息

DiFrancesca K R, Meloy J R

机构信息

Mental Health Division, San Diego County Department of Health Services, San Diego, CA. 92101.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1989 Summer;53(2):396. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5302_15.

Abstract

We studied the thought and affective disturbance of Megargee and Bohn's (1979) most psychopathological Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) subtypes, the "How" and "Charlie" profiles. 75 subjects, consisting of three groups of How and Charlie subtypes in inpatient and outpatient forensic settings and two control groups, are tested using the Whitaker Index of Schizophrenic Thinking (WIST) and Profile of Mood States (POMS). Results indicate both How and Charlie subtypes have mild formal thought disorder, with the former showing greater variance of thought disorder. Charlie subtypes, however, are more angry, less depressed, more vigorous, and more constricted and defensive than the How subtypes. We conclude that the How subtype needs further actuarial refinement to be diagnostically useful.

摘要

我们研究了梅加吉和博恩(1979年)所提出的明尼苏达多相人格调查表(MMPI)中最具精神病理学特征的“豪”型和“查理”型这两种亚型的思维及情感障碍。研究对75名受试者进行了测试,他们分为三组,分别是住院和门诊法医环境中的“豪”型和“查理”型亚型,还有两个对照组,测试使用了惠特克精神分裂症思维指数(WIST)和情绪状态剖面图(POMS)。结果表明,“豪”型和“查理”型亚型均有轻度的形式思维障碍,前者的思维障碍差异更大。然而,“查理”型亚型比“豪”型亚型更易怒、更少抑郁、更有活力,也更受限制和更具防御性。我们得出结论,“豪”型亚型需要进一步精确统计分析才能在诊断中发挥作用。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验