• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对违规者的反抗:为何当社会环境引发从轻处罚的期望时,当局会施以更严厉的惩罚。

Reactance to Transgressors: Why Authorities Deliver Harsher Penalties When the Social Context Elicits Expectations of Leniency.

作者信息

Moore Celia, Pierce Lamar

机构信息

Organisational Behaviour, London Business School London, UK.

Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis MO, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 May 9;7:550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00550. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00550
PMID:27242560
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4860465/
Abstract

This paper combines experimental and field data to examine how authorities with discretion over how rules are enforced penalize transgressors when the social context of the transgression elicits expectations of leniency. Specifically, we test how transgressors are punished when it is their birthday: a day that triggers expectations of lenient treatment. First, in three scenario studies we explore individuals' intuitions about how they would behave and expect to be treated if they transgressed on their birthdays, as well as how they would imagine penalizing a birthday transgressor. Second, using more than 134,000 arrest records for drunk driving in Washington State, we establish that police officers penalize drivers more harshly when it is their birthday. Then, in a lab experiment in which we grant participants discretion over enforcing the rules of an essay-writing contest, we test psychological reactance toward transgressors who make their birthday salient, even subtly, as the mechanism behind this increased stringency. We rule out several alternative explanations for this effect, including public safety concerns, negative affect and overcompensation for bias. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of our findings for the literatures on punishment, rule-breaking, and legal transgressions.

摘要

本文结合了实验数据和实地数据,以研究在违规行为的社会背景引发从轻处罚期望的情况下,有权决定如何执行规则的当局如何惩罚违规者。具体而言,我们测试当违规者生日当天违规时会受到怎样的惩罚:生日这一天会引发从轻处理的期望。首先,在三项情景研究中,我们探讨了个体对于如果他们在生日当天违规会如何表现以及期望受到怎样的对待的直觉,以及他们会如何设想惩罚生日违规者。其次,利用华盛顿州超过134,000份酒驾逮捕记录,我们证实警察在司机生日当天会对其处罚更严厉。然后,在一项实验室实验中,我们赋予参与者执行一篇作文竞赛规则的决定权,我们测试了对于那些即使只是微妙地突出自己生日的违规者的心理抗拒,以此作为这种更严格处罚背后的机制。我们排除了对这种效应的几种替代解释,包括公共安全担忧、负面情绪以及对偏差的过度补偿。最后,我们讨论了我们的研究结果对惩罚、违规行为和法律犯罪相关文献的理论和实践意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2b/4860465/13f3cbd2a884/fpsyg-07-00550-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2b/4860465/4a624e6fb100/fpsyg-07-00550-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2b/4860465/13f3cbd2a884/fpsyg-07-00550-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2b/4860465/4a624e6fb100/fpsyg-07-00550-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cb2b/4860465/13f3cbd2a884/fpsyg-07-00550-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Reactance to Transgressors: Why Authorities Deliver Harsher Penalties When the Social Context Elicits Expectations of Leniency.对违规者的反抗:为何当社会环境引发从轻处罚的期望时,当局会施以更严厉的惩罚。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 9;7:550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00550. eCollection 2016.
2
Impediments to forgiveness: Victim and transgressor attributions of intent and guilt.宽恕的阻碍:受害者与过错方对意图和罪责的归因
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Dec;111(6):866-881. doi: 10.1037/pspi0000070. Epub 2016 Aug 18.
3
Children's Navigation of Contextual Cues in Peer Transgressions: The Role of Aggression Form, Transgressor Gender, and Transgressor Intention.儿童对同伴违规情境线索的解读:攻击形式、违规者性别及违规意图的作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 16;13:813317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.813317. eCollection 2022.
4
Are young children's preferences and evaluations of moral and conventional transgressors associated with domain distinctions in judgments?幼儿对道德和传统违规者的偏好和评价是否与判断中的领域区别有关?
J Exp Child Psychol. 2018 Sep;173:284-303. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 May 14.
5
The patronizing character and status-preserving function of leniency for outgroup offenders.对群体外犯罪者宽大处理的优越感特征及地位维护功能。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2016 Jun;55(2):263-78. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12124. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
6
Making sense of punishment: Transgressors' interpretation of punishment motives determines the effects of sanctions.理解惩罚:违规者对惩罚动机的解读决定了制裁的效果。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jul;62(3):1395-1417. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12638. Epub 2023 Mar 9.
7
Will Life Extension Affect Our Social Judgments? Evidence That the Possibility of Indefinite Life Extension Increases Harshness Toward Social Transgressors.寿命延长会影响我们的社会判断吗?有证据表明,无限期延长寿命的可能性会增加对社会越轨者的严厉程度。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Apr;125(2):1041-1067. doi: 10.1177/0033294121988997. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
8
Are Children Perceived to Be Morally Exceptional? Different Sets of Psychological Variables Predict Adults' Moral Judgments About Adults and Young Children.儿童是否被认为在道德上是特殊的?不同的心理变量集预测了成年人对成年人和幼儿的道德判断。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Aug;44(8):1147-1162. doi: 10.1177/0146167218760800. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
9
Do drunk drivers pay their way? A note on optimal penalties for drunk driving.醉酒驾车者付出代价了吗?关于醉酒驾车最优处罚的一则短评。
J Health Econ. 1993 Jul;12(2):137-49. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90024-9.
10
Crime but not punishment? Children are more lenient toward rule-breaking when the "spirit of the law" is unbroken.犯罪而非惩罚?当“法律精神”未被破坏时,儿童对违反规则的行为更宽容。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Feb;178:266-282. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.09.019. Epub 2018 Nov 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Amazon's Mechanical Turk: A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data?亚马逊土耳其机器人:一种新的廉价、高质量数据来源?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;6(1):3-5. doi: 10.1177/1745691610393980. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
2
Attentive Turkers: MTurk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants.细心的土耳其工人:与样本库参与者相比,亚马逊土耳其机器人平台的参与者在在线注意力测试中的表现更好。
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Mar;48(1):400-7. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0578-z.
3
In sickness and in wealth: psychological and sexual costs of income comparison in marriage.
在健康和财富中:婚姻中收入比较的心理和性成本。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 Mar;39(3):359-74. doi: 10.1177/0146167212475321. Epub 2013 Feb 3.
4
The impact of choice on retributive reactions: how observers' autonomy concerns shape responses to criminal offenders.选择对报应反应的影响:观察者的自主权关注如何影响对犯罪者的反应。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;52(2):329-44. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02079.x. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
5
Prejudice reduction: what works? A review and assessment of research and practice.减少偏见:哪些方法有效?对研究与实践的综述及评估。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:339-67. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607.
6
Less guilty by reason of adolescence: developmental immaturity, diminished responsibility, and the juvenile death penalty.因青春期而罪责较轻:发育不成熟、责任减轻与青少年死刑
Am Psychol. 2003 Dec;58(12):1009-18. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.12.1009.
7
On face-work; an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction.关于面子工程:社会互动中仪式元素的分析
Psychiatry. 1955 Aug;18(3):213-31. doi: 10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008.
8
Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.我们为何进行惩罚?威慑与应得的惩罚作为惩罚的动机。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002 Aug;83(2):284-299. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.83.2.284.
9
Altruistic punishment in humans.人类中的利他惩罚。
Nature. 2002 Jan 10;415(6868):137-40. doi: 10.1038/415137a.
10
Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias.社会判断中的灵活校正过程:朴素理论在对感知偏差进行校正中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Jan;68(1):36-51. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.36.