• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

社会判断中的灵活校正过程:朴素理论在对感知偏差进行校正中的作用。

Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias.

作者信息

Wegener D T, Petty R E

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Ohio State University, Columbus 43210.

出版信息

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Jan;68(1):36-51. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.36.

DOI:10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.36
PMID:7861314
Abstract

Unlike many models of bias correction, our flexible correction model posits that corrections occur when judges are motivated and able to adjust assessments of targets according to their naive theories of how the context affects judgments of the target(s). In the current research, people flexibly correct assessments of different targets within the same context according to the differing theories associated with the context-target pairs. In Study 1, shared theories of assimilation and contrast bias are identified. Corrections consistent with those theories are obtained in Studies 2 and 3. Study 4 shows that idiographic measures of theories of bias predict the direction and magnitude of corrections. Implications of this work for corrections of attributions and bias removal in general are discussed.

摘要

与许多偏差校正模型不同,我们的灵活校正模型假定,当判断者有动机且能够根据他们关于情境如何影响对目标的判断的朴素理论来调整对目标的评估时,校正就会发生。在当前的研究中,人们会根据与情境 - 目标对相关的不同理论,在同一情境中灵活地校正对不同目标的评估。在研究1中,识别出同化和对比偏差的共享理论。在研究2和研究3中获得了与这些理论一致的校正。研究4表明,偏差理论的个性化测量能够预测校正的方向和幅度。本文还讨论了这项工作对归因校正和一般偏差消除的意义。

相似文献

1
Flexible correction processes in social judgment: the role of naive theories in corrections for perceived bias.社会判断中的灵活校正过程:朴素理论在对感知偏差进行校正中的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995 Jan;68(1):36-51. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.68.1.36.
2
Emotions and attributions of legal responsibility and blame: a research review.法律责任与责备的情感及归因:一项研究综述
Law Hum Behav. 2006 Apr;30(2):143-61. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9026-z.
3
Bidirectional correction in social judgments: how a cue to the risk of bias causes more favorable ratings of some groups but less favorable of others.双向纠正社会判断:偏见风险提示如何导致一些群体的评价更为有利,而另一些群体的评价则更为不利。
J Soc Psychol. 2013 Mar-Apr;153(2):131-48. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2012.711382.
4
Motivated perception of probabilistic information.概率信息的动机性感知。
Cognition. 2014 Nov;133(2):429-42. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 23.
5
Judgments of exocentric direction in large-scale space.大规模空间中离心方向的判断。
Perception. 2004;33(4):443-54. doi: 10.1068/p5218.
6
Predicting responsibility judgments from dispositional inferences and causal attributions.从性格推断和因果归因预测责任判断。
Cogn Psychol. 2021 Sep;129:101412. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101412. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
7
Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance.注意力会影响决策,但不会改变表象。
J Vis. 2008 Nov 10;8(15):3.1-10. doi: 10.1167/8.15.3.
8
Spillover bias in social and nonsocial judgments of diversity and variability.社会和非社会层面多样性与变异性判断中的溢出偏差。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Oct;30(5):1829-1839. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02259-5. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
9
Peering into the bias blind spot: people's assessments of bias in themselves and others.审视偏见盲点:人们对自身及他人偏见的评估
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 May;31(5):680-92. doi: 10.1177/0146167204271570.
10
A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment.一种道德判断的主观功利主义理论。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Oct;145(10):1359-1381. doi: 10.1037/xge0000210. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Bypassing as a non-confrontational influence strategy.回避:一种非对抗性的影响策略。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2024 Oct;59:101855. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2024.101855. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
2
A Dieting Facilitator on the Fridge Door: Can Dieters Deliberately Apply Environmental Dieting Cues to Lose Weight?冰箱门上的节食促进器:节食者能否有意识地利用环境节食提示来减肥?
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 21;11:582369. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.582369. eCollection 2020.
3
Becoming Aware of One's Own Biases in Emerging Adulthood-A Longitudinal Study. Metacognitive Approach.
在成年初期意识到自身偏见——一项纵向研究。元认知方法。
Adv Cogn Psychol. 2019 Nov 14;15(4):308-317. doi: 10.5709/acp-0278-y. eCollection 2019.
4
Make It Short and Easy: Username Complexity Determines Trustworthiness Above and Beyond Objective Reputation.简洁易记:用户名的复杂性比客观声誉更能决定可信度。
Front Psychol. 2017 Dec 19;8:2200. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02200. eCollection 2017.
5
Tools for fairness: Increased structure in the selection process reduces discrimination.公平工具:选拔过程中增加结构化程度可减少歧视。
PLoS One. 2017 Dec 11;12(12):e0189512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189512. eCollection 2017.
6
Weight stigma and eating behaviors on a college campus: Are students immune to stigma's effects?大学校园中的体重歧视与饮食行为:学生对歧视影响具有免疫力吗?
Prev Med Rep. 2016 Oct 29;4:578-584. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.10.005. eCollection 2016 Dec.
7
Reactance to Transgressors: Why Authorities Deliver Harsher Penalties When the Social Context Elicits Expectations of Leniency.对违规者的反抗:为何当社会环境引发从轻处罚的期望时,当局会施以更严厉的惩罚。
Front Psychol. 2016 May 9;7:550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00550. eCollection 2016.
8
Balancing Fairness and Efficiency: The Impact of Identity-Blind and Identity-Conscious Accountability on Applicant Screening.平衡公平与效率:身份盲视与身份意识问责制对申请人筛选的影响
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0145208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145208. eCollection 2015.
9
When the expectations from a message will not be realized: Naïve theories can eliminate expectation-congruent judgments via correction.当来自一条信息的期望无法实现时:朴素理论可以通过校正消除与期望相符的判断。
J Exp Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul 1;45(4):933-939. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.010.
10
Evaluative Conditioning: The "How" Question.评价性条件作用:“如何”的问题。
Adv Exp Soc Psychol. 2010 Jan 1;43:205-255. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43005-1.