Fattori Francesco, Curly Simone, Jörchel Amrei C, Pozzi Maura, Mihalits Dominik, Alfieri Sara
Department of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Department of Psychology, Sigmund Freud PrivatUniversität, Vienna, Austria.
Eur J Psychol. 2015 May 29;11(2):197-213. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v11i2.883. eCollection 2015 May.
Obedience and disobedience have always been salient issues for both civil society and social psychologists. Since Milgram's first studies on destructive obedience there has not been a bottom-up definition of what obedience and disobedience mean. The current study aimed at investigating the social representations young adults use to define and to co-construct knowledge about obedience and disobedience in Austria. One hundred fifty four (106 females, 68.8%) Austrian young adults (Mean age = 22.9; SD = 3.5) completed a mixed-method questionnaire comprising open-ended questions and free word associations. Overall obedience and disobedience are respectively defined as conformity and non-conformity to regulations, ranging from implicit social norms to explicit formal laws. Authority is multi-faceted and has a central role in orienting obedience and disobedience. Further fundamental determinants of the authority relationship and relevant application of the results are discussed in this paper.
顺从与不顺从一直是公民社会和社会心理学家关注的突出问题。自米尔格拉姆首次对破坏性顺从进行研究以来，对于顺从和不顺从的含义一直没有自下而上的定义。当前的研究旨在调查奥地利年轻人用于定义和共同构建关于顺从与不顺从知识的社会表征。154名（106名女性，占68.8%）奥地利年轻人（平均年龄 = 22.9；标准差 = 3.5）完成了一份混合方法问卷，其中包括开放式问题和自由词联想。总体而言，顺从和不顺从分别被定义为对规则的遵守和不遵守，范围从隐含的社会规范到明确的正式法律。权威具有多面性，并且在引导顺从和不顺从方面起着核心作用。本文还讨论了权威关系的其他基本决定因素以及结果的相关应用。
