York St. John University, York, UK.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Jun;52(2):290-309. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02070.x. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
The present paper outlines a perspective on Milgram's obedience experiments informed by rhetorical psychology. This perspective is demonstrated through a qualitative analysis of audio recordings and transcripts from two of Milgram's experimental conditions: 'voice-feedback' and 'women as subjects'. Analysis draws attention to the way in which participants could draw the experimenter into a process of negotiation over the continuation of the experimental session, something which could lead to quite radical departures from the standardized experimental procedure, and points to the ineffectiveness of Milgram's fourth prod (You have no other choice, you must go on). These observations are discussed in terms of their implications for theory and research on dis/obedience, with a specific focus on the concepts of choice and agency and the nature and meaning of dis/obedience.
本文概述了修辞心理学视角下的米尔格拉姆服从实验。通过对米尔格拉姆两个实验条件（“声音反馈”和“女性作为被试”）的录音和文字记录的定性分析，展示了这一视角。分析强调了参与者可以将实验者纳入实验过程协商的方式，这可能导致与标准化实验程序的相当大的偏离，并指出米尔格拉姆的第四次催促（你别无选择，必须继续）无效。这些观察结果从服从和反抗的理论和研究角度进行了讨论，特别关注选择和代理的概念以及服从和反抗的性质和意义。
