• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参与出生队列研究的动机调查。

Survey of motivation to participate in a birth cohort.

作者信息

Yamamoto Midori, Fujita Misuzu, Mori Chisato, Hata Akira

机构信息

Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.

出版信息

J Hum Genet. 2016 Sep;61(9):787-91. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2016.60. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

DOI:10.1038/jhg.2016.60
PMID:27251007
Abstract

For a longitudinal prospective cohort study to be successful, participants' motivation to provide information must be maintained. Therefore, this study aimed to identify items that effectively promote participants' motivation. Questionnaires were mailed to 4541 mothers and expectant mothers in Chiba Prefecture, Japan who participated in a nationwide birth cohort. A total of 2387 (52.6%) responses were received. The following items were identified as primary motivating factors among our cohort: "benefits to the participants' children", "monetary compensation" and "contribution to a better future environment". More than 30% of the respondents expressed a lack of understanding regarding the study purpose and requirements for participation. About 14% were concerned about the leakage of personal information, and 13% felt burdened by having to make a long-term commitment to the study. Cluster analysis identified four groups, two of which, one with extremely low levels of motivation and the other motivated by only money or goods, lacked an understanding of the study and tended to be concerned about the associated risks and burdens. Participants in these groups were considered to be at a high risk of dropout. Therefore, implementing measures to provide participants with a better understanding of cohort studies could lead to more successful results.

摘要

为使纵向前瞻性队列研究取得成功,必须保持参与者提供信息的积极性。因此,本研究旨在确定能有效提升参与者积极性的因素。研究问卷被邮寄给了日本千叶县参与一项全国性出生队列研究的4541名母亲和准妈妈。共收到2387份回复(回复率为52.6%)。以下因素被确定为队列中主要的激励因素:“对参与者子女有益”、“金钱补偿”以及“对未来更好环境的贡献”。超过30%的受访者表示对研究目的和参与要求缺乏理解。约14%的受访者担心个人信息泄露,13%的受访者因需长期参与研究而感到有负担。聚类分析确定了四组人群,其中两组,一组积极性极低,另一组仅受金钱或物品激励,他们对研究缺乏理解,且往往担心相关风险和负担。这些组别的参与者被认为退出研究的风险很高。因此,采取措施让参与者更好地了解队列研究可能会带来更成功的结果。

相似文献

1
Survey of motivation to participate in a birth cohort.参与出生队列研究的动机调查。
J Hum Genet. 2016 Sep;61(9):787-91. doi: 10.1038/jhg.2016.60. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
2
Analysis of motivations that lead women to participate (or not) in a newborn cohort study.分析导致女性参与(或不参与)新生儿队列研究的动机。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Apr 11;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-53.
3
REFRESH--reducing families' exposure to secondhand smoke in the home: a feasibility study.REFRESH--减少家庭中二手烟暴露:一项可行性研究。
Tob Control. 2013 Sep;22(5):e8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050212. Epub 2012 May 21.
4
Personal benefit, or benefiting others? Deciding whether to take part in clinical trials.个人获益还是造福他人?决定是否参与临床试验。
Clin Trials. 2011 Feb;8(1):85-93. doi: 10.1177/1740774510392257. Epub 2010 Dec 16.
5
A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.美国成年人对开展一项关于基因与环境的全国性精准医学计划队列研究的看法调查。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 17;11(8):e0160461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160461. eCollection 2016.
6
Study of the media's potential influence on prospective research participants' understanding of and motivations for participation in a high-profile phase I trial.关于媒体对潜在研究参与者对一项备受瞩目的I期试验的理解及参与动机的潜在影响的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2002 Sep 15;20(18):3785-91. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2002.04.084.
7
[Healthcare and daily needs of expectant Brazilian women residing in Japan. Analysis of fieldwork conducted during prenatal examinations and home visits].[居住在日本的巴西孕妇的医疗保健与日常需求。产前检查和家访期间实地调查的分析]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2012 Oct;59(10):762-70.
8
Perceptions of cancer patients and their physicians involved in phase I trials.参与I期试验的癌症患者及其医生的看法。
J Clin Oncol. 1995 May;13(5):1062-72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.5.1062.
9
Motivations of mothers to enroll their newborn infants in general clinical research on well-infant care and development.母亲们让其新生婴儿参与关于健康婴儿护理与发育的一般临床研究的动机。
Pediatrics. 2008 Mar;121(3):e590-6. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1571.
10
Participants' decision to enroll in cohort studies with biobanks: quantitative insights from two German studies.参与者加入生物样本库队列研究的决定:两项德国研究的定量见解。
Per Med. 2017 Nov;14(6):477-485. doi: 10.2217/pme-2017-0049. Epub 2017 Nov 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Feasibility and acceptability of conducting a birth cohort study during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study.在新冠疫情期间开展出生队列研究的可行性与可接受性:一项混合方法研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jul 16;25(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07850-3.
2
Provision of educational events and subsequent questionnaire response rates in a large-scale birth cohort study from Japan.在日本一项大规模的出生队列研究中提供教育活动和随后的问卷调查回复率。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 20;12(12):e064229. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064229.
3
Experiences of parents whose children participated in a longitudinal follow-up study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Belmont Report. Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research.《贝尔蒙报告》。保护人类研究受试者的伦理原则与准则。
J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13.
2
The Japan Environment and Children's Study (JECS): A Preliminary Report on Selected Characteristics of Approximately 10 000 Pregnant Women Recruited During the First Year of the Study.日本环境与儿童研究(JECS):关于研究第一年招募的约10000名孕妇选定特征的初步报告。
J Epidemiol. 2015;25(6):452-8. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20140186. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
3
Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children's study (JECS).
参与纵向随访研究的儿童的父母的经历。
Health Expect. 2022 Aug;25(4):1352-1362. doi: 10.1111/hex.13473. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
4
A cross-sectional survey examining motivation and beliefs to participating in a web-based prospective cohort study on nutrition and health among individuals with a low socioeconomic status.一项横断面调查研究,旨在探讨动机和信念,以了解经济社会地位较低的个体参与一项关于营养与健康的基于网络的前瞻性队列研究的情况。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Mar 17;20(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08467-1.
5
A training and education program for genome medical research coordinators in the genome cohort study of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Organization.一个针对基因组医学研究协调员的培训和教育计划,该计划是在东北医疗中心基因组队列研究中的一部分。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Aug 2;19(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1725-5.
6
"Telling" and assent: Parents' attitudes towards children's participation in a birth cohort study.“告知”与同意:家长对子女参与出生队列研究的态度。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):358-366. doi: 10.1111/hex.12630. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
日本环境与儿童研究(JECS)的基本原理和研究设计。
BMC Public Health. 2014 Jan 10;14:25. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-25.
4
Factors affecting maternal participation in the genetic component of the National Birth Defects Prevention Study-United States, 1997-2007.影响美国 1997-2007 年国家出生缺陷预防研究中母体参与遗传部分的因素。
Genet Med. 2014 Apr;16(4):329-37. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.143. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
5
Willingness of pregnant women to participate in a birth cohort study in China.中国孕妇参与出生队列研究的意愿。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Sep;122(3):216-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.04.003. Epub 2013 Jun 5.
6
Analysis of motivations that lead women to participate (or not) in a newborn cohort study.分析导致女性参与(或不参与)新生儿队列研究的动机。
BMC Pediatr. 2013 Apr 11;13:53. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-13-53.
7
Attitudes of pregnant women towards collection of biological specimens during pregnancy and at birth.孕妇对怀孕期间和分娩时采集生物标本的态度。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2012 May;26(3):272-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01265.x. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
8
The beliefs, motivations, and expectations of parents who have enrolled their children in a genetic biorepository.参与遗传生物库的家长的信念、动机和期望。
Genet Med. 2012 Mar;14(3):330-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.25. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
9
Qualitative assessment of study materials and communication strategies used in studies that include DNA collection.对包含 DNA 采集研究中使用的研究材料和沟通策略的定性评估。
Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Nov;155A(11):2721-31. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.34263. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
10
"Do I really want to do this?" Longitudinal cohort study participants' perspectives on postal survey design: a qualitative study.“我真的要这样做吗?”纵向队列研究参与者对邮寄调查设计的看法:一项定性研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Jan 27;11(1):8. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-8.