Schuldt Christoph, Birlbauer Sebastian, Pitchika Vinay, Crispin Alexander, Hickel Reinhard, Kühnisch Jan
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich.
Dent Mater J. 2016;35(3):490-7. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2015-323.
The aim of this study was to evaluate shear bond strength (SBS) and microleakage of a self-etching adhesive (Adper Prompt L-Pop) in comparison to acid etching prior fissure sealing. Each procedure was tested with 3 aging procedures (1-day water storage, 3-month water storage and 1-day water storage/5,000× thermocycling). SBS was determined according to ISO standard 29022. Additional 30 third molars were utilized for the microleakage analyses. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney-U-Test and multiple linear regression models. The SBS of the self-etching adhesive were significantly lower (14.9, 11.9, and 13.0 MPa) than those of conventional fissure sealing (19.1, 18.2, and 15.6 MPa). Multiple linear regression models predicted that material and alteration significantly influenced SBS. The microleakage revealed no difference between both groups (1.3% vs. 1.2%). It can be concluded that the selfetching adhesive might be a pre-treatment alternative for fissure sealing in terms of the easier and shorter clinical workflow.
本研究的目的是评估自酸蚀粘结剂(Adper Prompt L-Pop)与酸蚀后进行窝沟封闭相比的剪切粘结强度(SBS)和微渗漏情况。每个程序都采用3种老化程序进行测试(1天储水、3个月储水和1天储水/5000次热循环)。SBS根据ISO标准29022测定。另外使用30颗第三磨牙进行微渗漏分析。数据采用曼-惠特尼-U检验和多元线性回归模型进行分析。自酸蚀粘结剂的SBS(14.9、11.9和13.0MPa)显著低于传统窝沟封闭的SBS(19.1、18.2和15.6MPa)。多元线性回归模型预测,材料和老化对SBS有显著影响。微渗漏显示两组之间无差异(1.3%对1.2%)。可以得出结论,就更简便和更短的临床流程而言,自酸蚀粘结剂可能是窝沟封闭的一种预处理替代方法。