Liu Xiao Han, Li Jia Ying, Qu Xin Hua, Yan Wei Li, Zhang Ling, Yang Chi, Zheng Jia Wei
College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Department of Oral Surgery and Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Head and Neck Surgery, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, China.
Int J Cancer. 2016 Oct 1;139(7):1658-66. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30216. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
This meta-analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of current treatment modalities for kaposiform hemangioendothelioma and tufted angioma. A systematic review was performed using PubMed (Medline), Web of Science and Embase for clinical studies. The outcome was measured by pooled response rate with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), together with heterogeneity, subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis and publication bias. Fifteen studies with 244 participants were included in this analysis. Vincristine therapy exhibited a relatively higher response rate (0.72; 95%CI, 0.64-0.79) compared with other therapies including systemic corticosteroid (0.27; 95%CI, 0.17-0.36), interferon (0.36; 95%CI, 0.24-0.48), radiotherapy (0.49; 95%CI, 0.26-0.73), embolization (0.66; 95%CI, 0.48-0.83), aspirin/ticlopidine (0.42; 95%CI, 0.06-0.78) and sirolimus (0.57; 95%CI, 0.00-0.10), in treating KHE/TA. Subgroup analysis indicated that the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids therapy was age-related. The pooled response rate was 0.15 (95%CI, 0.08-0.23) for participants 3.5 months of age and older compared with 0.35 (95% CI, 0.26-0.44) for participants less than 3.5 months. Regarding side effects, systemic corticosteroids treatment was 0.32 (95%CI, 0.15-0.50), vincristine modality was 0.16 (95%CI, 0.08-0.24) and interferon therapy was 0.28 (95%CI, 0.13-0.43). In conclusion, as one of the first reviews evaluating the effect of common therapies in the treatment of KHE/TA, our meta-analysis displayed that vincristine was more effective. Thus, vincristine was the most effective, providing evidence supporting the use of vincristine as a first-line therapy for KHE/TA.
本荟萃分析旨在评估当前治疗卡波西样血管内皮瘤和簇状血管瘤的治疗方式的疗效。使用PubMed(Medline)、科学网和Embase对临床研究进行系统综述。通过合并反应率及95%置信区间(CI)、异质性、亚组分析、敏感性分析和发表偏倚来衡量结果。本分析纳入了15项研究,共244名参与者。与其他治疗方法相比,长春新碱治疗的反应率相对较高(0.72;95%CI,0.64 - 0.79),其他治疗方法包括全身用皮质类固醇(0.27;95%CI,0.17 - 0.36)、干扰素(0.36;95%CI,0.24 - 0.48)、放疗(0.49;95%CI,0.26 - 0.73)、栓塞(0.66;95%CI,0.48 - 0.83)、阿司匹林/噻氯匹定(0.42;95%CI,0.06 - 0.78)和西罗莫司(0.57;95%CI,0.00 - 0.10),用于治疗卡波西样血管内皮瘤/簇状血管瘤。亚组分析表明,全身用皮质类固醇治疗的疗效与年龄有关。3.5个月及以上参与者的合并反应率为0.15(95%CI,0.08 - 0.23),而小于3.5个月参与者的合并反应率为0.35(95%CI,0.26 - 0.44)。关于副作用,全身用皮质类固醇治疗为0.32(95%CI,0.15 - 0.50),长春新碱治疗方式为0.16(95%CI,0.08 - 0.24),干扰素治疗为0.28(95%CI,0.13 - 0.43)。总之,作为首批评估常见治疗方法对卡波西样血管内皮瘤/簇状血管瘤治疗效果的综述之一,我们的荟萃分析显示长春新碱更有效。因此,长春新碱是最有效的,为长春新碱作为卡波西样血管内皮瘤/簇状血管瘤一线治疗药物的使用提供了证据支持。