Richter-Heitmann Tim, Eickhorst Thilo, Knauth Stefan, Friedrich Michael W, Schmidt Hannes
Microbial Ecophysiology, Faculty of Biology/Chemistry, University of BremenBremen, Germany; International Max Planck Research School for Marine Microbiology, Max Planck Institute for Marine MicrobiologyBremen, Germany.
Soil Microbial Ecology, Faculty of Biology/Chemistry, University of Bremen Bremen, Germany.
Front Microbiol. 2016 May 24;7:773. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00773. eCollection 2016.
Plants shape distinct, species-specific microbiomes in their rhizospheres. A main premise for evaluating microbial communities associated with root-soil compartments is their successful separation into the rhizosphere (soil-root interface), the rhizoplane (root surface), and the endosphere (inside roots). We evaluated different approaches (washing, sonication, and bleaching) regarding their efficiency to separate microbial cells associated with different root compartments of soil-grown rice using fluorescence microscopy and community fingerprinting of 16S rRNA genes. Vigorous washing detached 45% of the rhizoplane population compared to untreated roots. Additional sonication reduced rhizoplane-attached microorganisms by up to 78% but caused various degrees of root tissue destruction at all sonication intensities tested. Treatment with sodium hypochlorite almost completely (98%) removed rhizoplane-associated microbial cells. Community fingerprinting revealed that microbial communities obtained from untreated, washed, and sonicated roots were not statistically distinguishable. Hypochlorite-treated roots harbored communities significantly different from all other samples, likely representing true endospheric populations. Applying these procedures to other root samples (bean and clover) revealed that treatment efficiencies were strongly affected by root morphological parameters such as root hair density and rigidity of epidermis. Our findings suggest that a careful evaluation of separation strategies prior to molecular community analysis is indispensable, especially when endophytes are the subject of interest.
植物在其根际塑造独特的、物种特异性的微生物群落。评估与根-土区室相关的微生物群落的一个主要前提是将它们成功分离为根际(土壤-根界面)、根表(根表面)和内生菌区(根内部)。我们使用荧光显微镜和16S rRNA基因的群落指纹分析,评估了不同方法(冲洗、超声处理和漂白)分离与土培水稻不同根区室相关的微生物细胞的效率。与未处理的根相比,剧烈冲洗使45%的根表微生物脱离。额外的超声处理使根表附着的微生物减少了78%,但在所有测试的超声强度下都导致了不同程度的根组织破坏。用次氯酸钠处理几乎完全(98%)去除了根表相关微生物细胞。群落指纹分析表明,从未处理、冲洗和超声处理的根中获得的微生物群落没有统计学差异。经次氯酸盐处理的根所携带的群落与所有其他样品显著不同,可能代表真正的内生菌群体。将这些程序应用于其他根样品(豆类和三叶草)表明,处理效率受根形态参数如根毛密度和表皮硬度的强烈影响。我们的研究结果表明,在进行分子群落分析之前,仔细评估分离策略是必不可少的,特别是当内生菌是研究对象时。