School of Psychology, Flinders University.
Institute of Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University.
Psychol Assess. 2017 Mar;29(3):264-281. doi: 10.1037/pas0000342. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
Mindfulness-based interventions show consistent benefits in adults for a range of pathologies, but exploration of these approaches in youth is an emergent field, with limited measures of mindfulness for this population. This study aimed to investigate whether multifactor scales of mindfulness can be used in adolescents. A series of studies are presented assessing the performance of a recently developed adult measure, the Comprehensive Inventory of Mindfulness Experiences (CHIME) in 4 early adolescent samples. Study 1 was an investigation of how well the full adult measure (37 items) was understood by youth (N = 292). Study 2 piloted a revision of items in child friendly language with a small group (N = 48). The refined questionnaire for adolescents (CHIME-A) was then tested in Study 3 in a larger sample (N = 461) and subjected to exploratory factor analysis and a range of external validity measures. Study 4 was a confirmatory factor analysis in a new sample (N = 498) with additional external validity measures. Study 5 tested temporal stability (N = 120). Results supported an 8-factor 25-item measure of mindfulness in adolescents, with excellent model fit indices and sound internal consistency for the 8 subscales. Although the CFA supported an overarching factor, internal reliability of a combined total score was poor. The development of a multifactor measure represents a first step toward testing developmental models of mindfulness in young people. This in turn will aid construction of evidence based interventions that are not simply downward derivations of adult mindfulness programs. (PsycINFO Database Record
正念干预在成年人中对一系列疾病表现出一致的益处,但在年轻人中探索这些方法是一个新兴领域,针对这一人群的正念测量方法有限。本研究旨在探讨多因素正念量表是否可用于青少年。目前提出了一系列研究,评估了最近开发的成人量表——综合正念体验量表(CHIME)在 4 个早期青少年样本中的表现。研究 1 调查了完整的成人量表(37 项)在青少年(N=292)中的理解程度。研究 2 用儿童友好的语言对项目进行了试点修订,样本量较小(N=48)。然后,在研究 3 中,对青少年的改良问卷(CHIME-A)在更大的样本(N=461)中进行了测试,并进行了探索性因素分析和一系列外部有效性测量。研究 4 在新样本(N=498)中进行了验证性因素分析,并进行了额外的外部有效性测量。研究 5 测试了时间稳定性(N=120)。结果支持青少年正念的 8 因素 25 项测量,8 个分量表具有极好的模型拟合指数和良好的内部一致性。尽管 CFA 支持总体因素,但综合总分的内部可靠性较差。多因素测量的发展是青少年正念发展模型测试的第一步。这反过来又将有助于构建基于证据的干预措施,而不是简单地从成人正念项目中向下推导。