Dima A, Opris D, Jurcut C, Baicus C
Colentina Clinical Hospital, Colentina Research Center, Bucharest, Romania Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania Sfanta Maria Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
Lupus. 2016 Oct;25(11):1173-9. doi: 10.1177/0961203316651742. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
The inflammatory response during systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) flares is known to be atypical, characterized by a disproportionately lower C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation when compared with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). Thus, in these patients, the analysis of inflammatory markers might be challenging in daily clinical practice. Clinicians need frequently to distinguish lupus reactivations and infectious conditions, and the significance of ESR and CRP seems to be different. Even though a non-specific marker of inflammation, ESR utility in SLE should not be neglected and it appears to be a useful biomarker for SLE activity assessment. Describing a specific cut-off for ESR in SLE is important for patients' follow-up, and levels up to 25-30 mm/h have been proposed as an upper limit of the normal range. Regarding CRP, even though higher baseline levels are described in SLE when compared with controls, including in remission periods, its response during flares seems to be incomplete and not always correlated with disease activity; while CRP values greater than 10 mg/l could be indicative for severe flares, when there is no serositis or arthritis, higher CRP levels above 50-60 mg/l may be associated with infection.
已知系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)发作期间的炎症反应是非典型的,其特征是与红细胞沉降率(ESR)相比,C反应蛋白(CRP)升高幅度相对较低。因此,在日常临床实践中,对这些患者进行炎症标志物分析可能具有挑战性。临床医生经常需要区分狼疮复发和感染情况,ESR和CRP的意义似乎有所不同。尽管ESR是一种非特异性炎症标志物,但在SLE中的作用不应被忽视,它似乎是评估SLE活动的有用生物标志物。确定SLE中ESR的特定临界值对患者的随访很重要,已提出ESR高达25 - 30mm/h作为正常范围的上限。关于CRP,尽管与对照组相比,包括在缓解期,SLE患者的基线水平较高,但其在发作期间的反应似乎并不完全,且并不总是与疾病活动相关;虽然CRP值大于10mg/l可能提示严重发作,但在没有浆膜炎或关节炎的情况下,高于50 - 60mg/l的更高CRP水平可能与感染有关。