Roelofsen Eefje G J, Bosga Jurjen, Rosenbaum David A, Nijhuis-van der Sanden Maria W G, Hullegie Wim, van Cingel Robert, Meulenbroek Ruud G J
Donders Centre for Cognition, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, P.O. Box 9104, 6500 HE, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Research Group Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, HAN University of Applied Sciences, P.O. Box 6960, 6503 GL, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Exp Brain Res. 2016 Oct;234(10):2869-81. doi: 10.1007/s00221-016-4689-2. Epub 2016 Jun 4.
The present study investigated whether special haptic or visual feedback would facilitate the coordination of in-phase, cyclical feet movements of different amplitudes. Seventeen healthy participants sat with their feet on sliding panels that were moved externally over the same or different amplitudes. The participants were asked to generate simultaneous knee flexion-extension movements, or to let their feet be dragged, resulting in reference foot displacements of 150 mm and experimental foot displacements of 150, 120, or 90 mm. Four types of feedback were given: (1) special haptic feedback, involving actively following the motions of the sliders manipulated by two confederates, (2) haptic feedback resulting from passive motion, (3) veridical visual feedback, and (4) enhanced visual feedback. Both with respect to amplitude assimilation effects, correlations and standard deviation of relative phase, the results showed that enhanced visual feedback did not facilitate bipedal independence, but haptic feedback with active movement did. Implications of the findings for movement rehabilitation contexts are discussed.
本研究调查了特殊触觉或视觉反馈是否会促进不同幅度的同相、周期性足部运动的协调。17名健康参与者坐在椅子上,双脚放在滑动面板上,滑动面板在相同或不同幅度下进行外部移动。参与者被要求同时进行膝关节屈伸运动,或者让他们的脚被拖动,从而产生150毫米的参考足部位移以及150、120或90毫米的实验足部位移。提供了四种类型的反馈:(1)特殊触觉反馈,包括主动跟随两名同伙操纵的滑块的运动;(2)被动运动产生的触觉反馈;(3)真实视觉反馈;(4)增强视觉反馈。无论是关于幅度同化效应、相对相位的相关性和标准差,结果都表明增强视觉反馈并没有促进双足独立性,但主动运动的触觉反馈起到了促进作用。讨论了这些发现对运动康复环境的影响。