• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多器械接入装置在腹会阴联合切除术中的应用。

Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections.

作者信息

van der Linden Yoen Tk, Boersma Doeke, Bosscha Koop, Lips Daniel J, Prins Hubert A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Medical Center, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Jul-Sep;12(3):248-53. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181386.

DOI:10.4103/0972-9941.181386
PMID:27279397
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4916752/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic colorectal surgery results in less post-operative pain, faster recovery, shorter length of stay and reduced morbidity compared with open procedures. Less or minimally invasive techniques have been developed to further minimise surgical trauma and to decrease the size and number of incisions. This study describes the safety and feasibility of using an umbilical multi-instrument access (MIA) port (Olympus TriPort+) device with the placement of just one 12-mm suprapubic trocar in laparoscopic (double-port) abdominoperineal resections (APRs) in rectal cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 20 patients undergoing double-port APRs for rectal cancer between June 2011 and August 2013. Preoperative data were gathered in a prospective database, and post-operative data were collected retrospectively.

RESULTS

The 20 patients (30% female) had a median age of 67 years (range 46-80 years), and their median body mass index (BMI) was 26 kg/m2 (range 20-31 kg/m2). An additional third trocar was placed in 2 patients. No laparoscopic procedures were converted to an open procedure. Median operating time was 195 min (range 115-306 min). A radical resection (R0 resection) was achieved in all patients, with a median of 14 lymph nodes harvested. Median length of stay was 8 days (range 5-43 days).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic APR using a MIA trocar is a feasible and safe procedure. A MIA port might be of benefit as an extra option in the toolbox of the laparoscopic surgeon to further minimise surgical trauma.

摘要

背景

与开放手术相比,腹腔镜结直肠手术术后疼痛更少、恢复更快、住院时间更短且发病率更低。已经开发出更少或微创技术以进一步减少手术创伤并减少切口的大小和数量。本研究描述了在直肠癌患者的腹腔镜(双端口)腹会阴联合切除术(APR)中使用脐部多器械接入(MIA)端口(奥林巴斯TriPort+)设备并仅放置一个12毫米耻骨上套管针的安全性和可行性。

患者与方法

该研究纳入了2011年6月至2013年8月间接受双端口直肠癌APR手术的20例患者。术前数据收集于前瞻性数据库,术后数据进行回顾性收集。

结果

20例患者(30%为女性)的中位年龄为67岁(范围46 - 80岁),中位体重指数(BMI)为26 kg/m²(范围20 - 31 kg/m²)。2例患者额外放置了第三个套管针。无腹腔镜手术转为开放手术。中位手术时间为195分钟(范围115 - 306分钟)。所有患者均实现了根治性切除(R0切除),中位清扫淋巴结数为14枚。中位住院时间为8天(范围5 - 43天)。

结论

使用MIA套管针进行腹腔镜APR是一种可行且安全的手术。MIA端口作为腹腔镜外科医生工具库中的额外选择,可能有助于进一步减少手术创伤。

相似文献

1
Use of a multi-instrument access device in abdominoperineal resections.多器械接入装置在腹会阴联合切除术中的应用。
J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Jul-Sep;12(3):248-53. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.181386.
2
Technique and short-term outcomes of single-port surgery for rectal cancer: a feasibility study of 25 patients.经单端口手术治疗直肠癌的技术和短期疗效:25 例患者的可行性研究。
Scand J Surg. 2014 Mar;103(1):26-33. doi: 10.1177/1457496913495387. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
3
Laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for anorectal cancer.腹腔镜腹会阴联合直肠癌切除术
Am Surg. 1998 Jan;64(1):12-8.
4
Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results.经自制手套装置的双端口腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术与传统腹腔镜直肠癌前切除术:短期手术结果比较
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct 26;14(1):275. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1029-8.
5
Laparoscopic-assisted abdominoperineal resection for low rectal cancer provides a shorter length of hospital stay while not affecting the recurrence or survival: a propensity score-matched analysis.腹腔镜辅助腹会阴联合切除术治疗低位直肠癌可缩短住院时间,且不影响复发率或生存率:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Surg Today. 2016 Jul;46(7):798-806. doi: 10.1007/s00595-015-1244-x. Epub 2015 Sep 5.
6
Reduced-port laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: feasibility based on our early experience.直肠癌的减孔腹腔镜手术:基于我们早期经验的可行性
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2013 Aug;6(3):249-52. doi: 10.1111/ases.12022.
7
[Preliminary experience of dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer].[双端口腹腔镜远端胃癌切除术的初步经验]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Jan 25;22(1):35-42.
8
Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the first 100 resections.单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:前 100 例切除。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):134-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823c0ae4.
9
Laparoscopic Double Discoid Resection With a Circular Stapler for Bowel Endometriosis.使用圆形吻合器行腹腔镜双盘状切除术治疗肠道子宫内膜异位症
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015 Sep-Oct;22(6):929-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.04.021. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
10
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for the treatment of different urologic pathologies in pediatrics: single-center single-surgeon experience.腹腔镜单孔手术(LESS)治疗小儿不同泌尿系统疾病:单中心单术者经验
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Feb;11(1):33.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Oct 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis comparing extraperitoneal and transperitoneal routes of colostomy-related complications.比较结肠造口术相关并发症的腹膜外和经腹途径的系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar 27;17(3):98947. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i3.98947.
2
Extraperitoneal sigmoidostomy: a surgical approach with less complications and better functions for abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer.腹膜外乙状结肠造口术:一种用于直肠癌腹会阴联合切除且并发症较少、功能更佳的手术方法。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2018 Jan;33(1):41-46. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2931-4. Epub 2017 Nov 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence of port-site incisional hernia after single-incision laparoscopic surgery.单孔腹腔镜手术后切口疝的发生率。
JSLS. 2014 Apr-Jun;18(2):204-10. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422518317.
2
Feasibility of single-port laparoscopic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancers and preoperative assessment of operative difficulty.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗超低位直肠癌的临床研究
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 May;18(5):977-85. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2463-y. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
3
Single-port laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the learning curve.单孔腹腔镜右半结肠切除术:学习曲线
JSLS. 2013 Apr-Jun;17(2):194-7. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13654754534558.
4
Learning curve of transumbilical suture-suspension single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.经脐缝合悬吊式单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的学习曲线。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 7;19(29):4786-90. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i29.4786.
5
Critical appraisal of learning curve for single incision laparoscopic right colectomy.单切口腹腔镜右半结肠切除术学习曲线的评价。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4499-503. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3096-z. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
6
Evaluating national practice of preoperative radiotherapy for rectal cancer based on clinical auditing.基于临床审核评估直肠癌术前放疗的国家实践。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;39(9):1000-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.06.010. Epub 2013 Jun 28.
7
SILC for SILC: Single Institution Learning Curve for Single-Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的单机构学习曲线:单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术的单机构学习曲线
Minim Invasive Surg. 2013;2013:381628. doi: 10.1155/2013/381628. Epub 2013 May 9.
8
Case-matched comparison of the short-term outcomes between laparoscopic and open abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹经腹会阴联合切除术治疗直肠癌的短期疗效对比的病例匹配研究。
Surg Today. 2014 Apr;44(4):640-5. doi: 10.1007/s00595-013-0611-8. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with improved cosmesis scoring at the cost of significantly higher hernia rates: 1-year results of a prospective randomized, multicenter, single-blinded trial of traditional multiport laparoscopic cholecystectomy vs single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术在美容评分方面具有优势,但疝的发生率显著升高:传统多孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术与单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术前瞻性随机、多中心、单盲临床试验的 1 年结果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Jun;216(6):1037-47; discussion 1047-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.02.024. Epub 2013 Apr 23.
10
Cancer prevalence estimates in Europe at the beginning of 2000.2000 年初欧洲的癌症患病率估计。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Jun;24(6):1660-6. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt030. Epub 2013 Apr 3.