Fossati Andrea, Borroni Serena, Somma Antonella, Markon Kristian E, Krueger Robert F
Department of Human Studies, LUMSA University.
Faculty of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University.
Personal Disord. 2017 Jul;8(3):275-280. doi: 10.1037/per0000192. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
In order to study the relationships between DSM-5 Section III maladaptive personality traits and personality dysfunction, 312 Italian community dwelling adults completed the Italian translations of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) and the Measure of Disordered Personality Functioning Scale (MDPF); participants were also administered the Iowa Personality Disorder Screen (IPDS). Consistent with previous findings, 22 (88.0%) PID-5 maladaptive trait scales showed moderate and significant correlations with MDPF Non Coping (median r value = .32), and Non Cooperativeness, (median r value = .24) scales. Regression analyses showed that PID-5 trait scales explained roughly 59% and 35% of the variance in MDPF Non Coping and Non Cooperativeness scales, respectively. PID-5 traits were significantly associated also with the IPDS total score, adjusted R2 = .45, p < .001. As a whole, our data seemed to indicate that the wide majority of the PID-5 scales showed significant relationships of at least moderate size with a self-report measure of personality dysfunction, lending further support to the criterion validity of the PID-5. (PsycINFO Database Record
为了研究《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版（DSM-5）第三部分适应不良人格特质与人格功能障碍之间的关系，312名居住在意大利社区的成年人完成了DSM-5人格量表（PID-5）和人格功能障碍测量量表（MDPF）的意大利语翻译版本；参与者还接受了爱荷华人格障碍筛查（IPDS）。与之前的研究结果一致，22个（88.0%）PID-5适应不良特质量表与MDPF的非应对（中位数r值 = 0.32）和非合作性（中位数r值 = 0.24）量表显示出中度且显著的相关性。回归分析表明，PID-5特质量表分别解释了MDPF非应对量表和非合作性量表中约59%和35%的方差。PID-5特质也与IPDS总分显著相关，调整后的R2 = 0.45，p < 0.001。总体而言，我们的数据似乎表明，绝大多数PID-5量表与人格功能障碍的自我报告测量显示出至少中等程度的显著关系，这进一步支持了PID-5的效标效度。（PsycINFO数据库记录）
