Alba Sandra, Bakker Mirjam I, Hatta Mochammad, Scheelbeek Pauline F D, Dwiyanti Ressy, Usman Romi, Sultan Andi R, Sabir Muhammad, Tandirogang Nataniel, Amir Masyhudi, Yasir Yadi, Pastoor Rob, van Beers Stella, Smits Henk L
KIT Biomedical Research, Royal Tropical Institute (KIT), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Medical Microbiology, Molecular Biology and Immunology Laboratory, Faculty of Medicine, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South-Sulawesi, Indonesia.
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 9;11(6):e0155286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155286. eCollection 2016.
Knowledge of risk factors and their relative importance in different settings is essential to develop effective health education material for the prevention of typhoid. In this study, we examine the effect of household level and individual behavioural risk factors on the risk of typhoid in three Indonesian islands (Sulawesi, Kalimantan and Papua) in the Eastern Indonesian archipelago encompassing rural, peri-urban and urban areas.
We enrolled 933 patients above 10 years of age in a health facility-based case-control study between June 2010 and June 2011. Individuals suspected of typhoid were tested using the typhoid IgM lateral flow assay for the serodiagnosis of typhoid fever followed by blood culture testing. Cases and controls were defined post-recruitment: cases were individuals with a culture or serology positive result (n = 449); controls were individuals negative to both serology and culture, with or without a diagnosis other than typhoid (n = 484). Logistic regression was used to examine the effect of household level and individual level behavioural risk factors and we calculated the population attributable fraction (PAF) of removing each risk significant independent behavioural risk factor.
Washing hands at critical moments of the day and washing hands with soap were strong independent protective factors for typhoid (OR = 0.38 95% CI 0.25 to 0.58 for each unit increase in hand washing frequency score with values between 0 = Never and 3 = Always; OR = 3.16 95% CI = 2.09 to 4.79 comparing washing hands with soap sometimes/never vs. often). These effects were independent of levels of access to water and sanitation. Up to two thirds of cases could be prevented by compliance to these practices (hand washing PAF = 66.8 95% CI 61.4 to 71.5; use of soap PAF = 61.9 95%CI 56.7 to 66.5). Eating food out in food stalls or restaurant was an important risk factor (OR = 6.9 95%CI 4.41 to 10.8 for every unit increase in frequency score).
Major gains could potentially be achieved in reducing the incidence of typhoid by ensuring adherence to adequate hand-washing practices alone. This confirms that there is a pivotal role for 'software' related interventions to encourage behavior change and create demand for goods and services, alongside development of water and sanitation infrastructure.
了解危险因素及其在不同环境中的相对重要性对于制定有效的伤寒预防健康教育材料至关重要。在本研究中,我们调查了印度尼西亚东部群岛三个岛屿(苏拉威西岛、加里曼丹岛和巴布亚岛)家庭层面和个体行为危险因素对伤寒风险的影响,这些岛屿涵盖农村、城郊和城市地区。
在2010年6月至2011年6月期间,我们在一项基于医疗机构的病例对照研究中纳入了933名10岁以上的患者。对疑似伤寒的个体使用伤寒IgM侧向流动分析法进行血清学诊断伤寒热,随后进行血培养检测。病例和对照在招募后确定:病例为培养或血清学检测呈阳性的个体(n = 449);对照为血清学和培养均为阴性的个体,无论是否有伤寒以外的诊断(n = 484)。使用逻辑回归分析家庭层面和个体层面行为危险因素的影响,并计算消除每个显著独立行为危险因素的人群归因分数(PAF)。
在一天中的关键时刻洗手以及用肥皂洗手是预防伤寒的强有力独立保护因素(洗手频率得分每增加一个单位,0 = 从不,3 = 总是,OR = 0.38,95%CI 0.25至0.58;将有时/从不使用肥皂洗手与经常使用肥皂洗手进行比较,OR = 3.16,95%CI = 2.09至4.79)。这些影响与获得水和卫生设施的水平无关。遵守这些做法可预防高达三分之二的病例(洗手PAF = 66.8,95%CI 61.4至71.5;使用肥皂PAF = 61.9,95%CI 56.7至66.5)。在食品摊或餐馆就餐是一个重要的危险因素(频率得分每增加一个单位,OR = 6.9,95%CI 4.41至10.8)。
仅通过确保坚持适当的洗手做法,在降低伤寒发病率方面可能会取得重大进展。这证实了与“软件”相关的干预措施在鼓励行为改变以及创造对商品和服务的需求方面具有关键作用,同时还要发展水和卫生基础设施。