Stefaniuk Elzbieta, Baraniak Anna, Fortuna Monika, Hryniewicz Waleria
Pol J Microbiol. 2016;65(1):111-4. doi: 10.5604/17331331.1197283.
This study was conducted to compare of the yeasts identification results obtained with two new systems using the MALDI-TOF MS technique with the ones obtained using the routine identification methods of Candida spp. in clinical microbiology laboratories. All 124 Candida spp. isolates were recovered from the routine examination of clinical specimens in microbiological laboratories and collected in the Centre of Quality Control in Microbiology in Warsaw (Poland). Our findings confirm the high agreement (98%) of fungal identification using the standard, biochemistry laboratory methods and mass spectrometry technique.
本研究旨在比较使用基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)技术的两种新系统所获得的酵母菌鉴定结果与临床微生物实验室中使用念珠菌属常规鉴定方法所获得的结果。所有124株念珠菌属分离株均从微生物实验室临床标本的常规检查中获得,并收集于华沙(波兰)微生物学质量控制中心。我们的研究结果证实,使用标准生物化学实验室方法和质谱技术进行真菌鉴定的一致性很高(98%)。