Gardner Aimee K, Scott Daniel J, Willis Ross E, Van Sickle Kent, Truitt Michael S, Uecker John, Brown Kimberly M, Marks Jeffrey M, Dunkin Brian J
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390, USA.
University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):352-358. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
The purpose of this study was to assess the adequacy of current surgical residency and gastroenterology (GI) fellowship flexible endoscopy training as measured by performance on the FES examination.
Fifth-year general surgery residents and GI fellows across six institutions were invited to participate. All general surgery residents had met ACGME/ABS case volume requirements as well as additional institution-specific requirements for endoscopy. All participants completed FES testing at the end of their respective academic year. Procedure volumes were obtained from ACGME case logs. Curricular components for each specialty and institution were recorded.
Forty-eight (28 surgery and 20 GI) trainees completed the examination. Average case numbers for residents were 76 ± 26 colonoscopies and 45 ± 12 EGDs. Among GI fellows, PGY4 s (N = 10) reported 99 ± 64 colonoscopies and 147 ± 79 EGDs. PGY5 s (N = 3) reported 462 ± 307 colonoscopies and 411 ± 260 EGDs. PGY6 GI fellows (N = 7) reported 515 ± 111 colonoscopies and 418 ± 146 EGDs. The overall pass rate for all participants was 75 %, with 68 % of residents and 85 % of fellows passing both the cognitive and skills components. For surgery residents, pass rates were 75 % for manual skills and 85.7 % for cognitive. On the skills examination, Task 2 (loop reduction) was associated with the lowest performance. Skills scores correlated with both colonoscopy (r = 0.46, p < 0.001) and EGD experience (r = 0.46, p < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristics curves were examined among the resident cohort. The minimum number of total cases associated with passing the FES skills component was 103. Significant variability existed in curricular components across institutions.
These data suggest that current flexible endoscopy training may not be sufficient for all trainees to pass the examination. Implementing additional components of the FEC may prove beneficial in achieving more uniform pass rates on the FES examination.
本研究旨在通过FES考试成绩评估当前外科住院医师培训和胃肠病学(GI)专科培训中软性内镜检查培训的充分性。
邀请了六个机构的五年级普通外科住院医师和GI专科培训学员参与。所有普通外科住院医师均已达到ACGME/ABS规定的病例数量要求以及各机构特定的内镜检查额外要求。所有参与者在各自学年结束时完成FES测试。手术量从ACGME病例记录中获取。记录每个专业和机构的课程组成部分。
48名(28名外科和20名GI)学员完成了考试。住院医师的平均病例数为结肠镜检查76±26例,上消化道内镜检查(EGD)45±12例。在GI专科培训学员中,四年级(N = 10)报告结肠镜检查99±64例,EGD 147±79例。五年级(N = 3)报告结肠镜检查462±307例,EGD 411±260例。六年级GI专科培训学员(N = 7)报告结肠镜检查515±111例,EGD 418±146例。所有参与者的总体通过率为75%,68%的住院医师和85%的专科培训学员通过了认知和技能部分。对于外科住院医师,操作技能通过率为75%,认知通过率为85.7%。在技能考试中,任务2(圈套器复位)的表现最差。技能得分与结肠镜检查(r = 0.46,p < 0.001)和EGD经验(r = 0.46,p < 0.001)均相关。对住院医师队列进行了受试者工作特征曲线分析。与通过FES技能部分相关的病例总数最少为103例。各机构的课程组成部分存在显著差异。
这些数据表明,当前的软性内镜检查培训可能不足以让所有学员通过考试。实施FEC的其他组成部分可能有助于在FES考试中实现更统一的通过率。