• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于能力的准备显著提高 FES 认证表现。

Proficiency-based preparation significantly improves FES certification performance.

机构信息

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX, 75390-9092, USA.

University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4451-4457. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6190-4. Epub 2018 Apr 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-018-6190-4
PMID:29644467
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) certification has recently been mandated by the American Board of Surgery but best methods for preparing for the exam are lacking. Our previous work demonstrated a 40% pass rate for PGY5 residents in our program. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a proficiency-based skills and cognitive curriculum for FES certification.

METHODS

Residents who agreed to participate (n = 15) underwent an orientation session, followed by skills pre-testing using three previously described models (Trus, Operation targeting task, and Kyoto) as well as the actual FES skills exam (vouchers provided by the FES committee). Participants then trained to proficiency on all three models for the skills curriculum and completed the FES online didactic material for the cognitive curriculum. Finally, participants post-tested on the models and took the actual FES certification exam. Values are mean ± SD; p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Of 15 residents who participated, 8 (53%) passed the FES skills exam at baseline. Participants required 2.7 ± 1.3 h to achieve proficiency on the models and approximately 3 h to complete the cognitive curriculum. At post-test, 14 (93%, vs. pre-test 53%, p = 0.041) passed the FES skills exam. 14 (93%) passed the FES cognitive exam and 13/15 (87%) passed both the skills and cognitive exam and achieved FES certification.

CONCLUSIONS

Our traditional clinical endoscopy curricula were not sufficient for senior residents to pass the FES exam. Implementation of a proficiency-based flexible endoscopy curriculum using bench-top models and the FES online materials was feasible and effective for the majority of learners. Importantly, with a modest amount of additional training, 87% of our trainees were able to pass the FES examination, which represents a significant improvement for our program. We expect that additional refinements of this curriculum may yield even better results for preparing future residents for the FES examination.

摘要

背景

美国外科委员会最近要求外科住院医师必须通过内镜外科技能基础(FES)认证,但目前缺乏准备该考试的最佳方法。我们之前的研究表明,我们项目中 5 年级住院医师的通过率为 40%。本研究旨在确定基于熟练程度的技能和认知课程对 FES 认证的有效性。

方法

同意参加的住院医师(n=15)参加了一个介绍会,然后使用之前描述的三种模型(Trus、Operation targeting task 和 Kyoto)进行技能预测试,并进行了实际的 FES 技能考试(由 FES 委员会提供的代金券)。然后,参与者在所有三个模型上进行技能课程培训,直到达到熟练程度,并完成 FES 在线教学材料的认知课程。最后,参与者在模型上进行后测并参加实际的 FES 认证考试。数值为平均值±标准差;p<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

在 15 名参加的住院医师中,有 8 名(53%)在基线时通过了 FES 技能考试。参与者需要 2.7±1.3 小时才能在模型上达到熟练程度,大约需要 3 小时才能完成认知课程。在后测中,14 名(93%,前测为 53%,p=0.041)通过了 FES 技能考试。14 名(93%)通过了 FES 认知考试,13/15(87%)名通过了技能和认知考试并获得了 FES 认证。

结论

我们传统的临床内镜课程不足以让高级住院医师通过 FES 考试。使用台式模型和 FES 在线材料实施基于熟练程度的灵活内镜课程对大多数学习者来说是可行且有效的。重要的是,通过少量额外的培训,我们的 87%的受训者能够通过 FES 考试,这对我们的项目来说是一个重大的改进。我们预计,对该课程的进一步改进可能会为未来的住院医师准备 FES 考试带来更好的结果。

相似文献

1
Proficiency-based preparation significantly improves FES certification performance.基于能力的准备显著提高 FES 认证表现。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Nov;32(11):4451-4457. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6190-4. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
2
FES exam outcomes in year two of a proficiency-based endoscopic skills curriculum.基于能力的内镜技能课程第二年的 FES 考试结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):961-966. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06902-y. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
3
Simulation-based mastery learning for endoscopy using the endoscopy training system: a strategy to improve endoscopic skills and prepare for the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery (FES) manual skills exam.基于模拟的内镜掌握学习:利用内镜训练系统提高内镜技能并为内镜手术基础(FES)手工技能考试做准备的策略。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):413-420. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5697-4. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
Development of a train-to-proficiency curriculum for the technical skills component of the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery exam.内镜手术基础考试技术技能部分熟练程度训练课程的开发。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3070-3075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-6018-7. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
5
Development of a fundamentals of endoscopic surgery proficiency-based skills curriculum for general surgery residents.普通外科住院医师内镜手术基本技能基于能力的课程的开发。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):771-778. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06827-6. Epub 2019 May 17.
6
Optimal Timing of Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) Testing in General Surgery Residency: Early Is Better.普通外科住院医师内镜手术基础(FES)测试的最佳时机:早测更好。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2893-2898. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05727-4. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
7
Transfer of virtual reality endoscopy training to live animal colonoscopy: a randomized control trial of proficiency vs. repetition-based training.虚拟现实内镜培训向活体动物结肠镜检查的转移:基于熟练度与重复训练的随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Sep;36(9):6767-6776. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08958-1. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
8
Preparing for the American Board of Surgery Flexible Endoscopy Curriculum: Development of multi-institutional proficiency-based training standards and pilot testing of a simulation-based mastery learning curriculum for the Endoscopy Training System.为美国外科学委员会内镜检查课程做准备:制定基于多机构能力的培训标准,并在内镜训练系统中试点基于模拟的精通学习课程。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):167-173. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
9
A proficiency-based virtual reality endoscopy curriculum improves performance on the fundamentals of endoscopic surgery examination.基于熟练度的虚拟现实内镜课程可提高内镜手术基础考试的成绩。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Mar;32(3):1397-1404. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5821-5. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
10
Are you better off than you were 4 years ago? Measuring the impact of the ABS flexible endoscopy curriculum.你现在的状况比四年前好吗?评估 ABS 灵活内镜课程的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):4110-4114. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07176-0. Epub 2019 Oct 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding ACGME Standards for Simulation: A Document Analysis of Institutional and Program Requirements.解读美国毕业后医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)的模拟标准:机构与项目要求的文献分析
J Grad Med Educ. 2024 Dec;16(6):691-700. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-24-00127.1. Epub 2024 Dec 13.
2
Current status of resident simulation training curricula: pearls and pitfalls.住院医师模拟培训课程的现状:经验与教训。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):4788-4797. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11093-2. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
3
From the simulation lab to the operating room: simulation performance predicts intraoperative performance in robotic gastrojejunostomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for privileging and credentialing physicians in gastrointestinal endoscopy.胃肠内镜检查医师特权授予与资质认定指南。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Aug;30(8):3184-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5066-8. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
2
Is current surgery resident and GI fellow training adequate to pass FES?目前外科住院医师和胃肠病学研究员的培训是否足以通过粪便弹性蛋白酶检测(FES)?
Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):352-358. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4979-6. Epub 2016 Jun 10.
3
A proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the SAGES surgical training for endoscopic proficiency (STEP) program.
从模拟实验室到手术室:机器人胃空肠吻合术中的模拟表现预测术中表现。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5967-5973. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11035-y. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
4
Can my surgeon scope? Trends in endoscopy training volume and experience among general surgery residents in the United States: a nationwide analysis.我的外科医生可以进行内镜检查吗?美国普通外科住院医师内镜培训量和经验的趋势:全国性分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Mar;38(3):1491-1498. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10690-5. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Optimal Timing of Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) Testing in General Surgery Residency: Early Is Better.普通外科住院医师内镜手术基础(FES)测试的最佳时机:早测更好。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Dec;27(12):2893-2898. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05727-4. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
6
Resident Endoscopy Experience Correlates Poorly with Performance on a Virtual Reality Simulator.住院医师的内镜检查经验与虚拟现实模拟器上的操作表现相关性较差。
Surg J (N Y). 2022 Mar 3;8(1):e80-e85. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743517. eCollection 2022 Jan.
7
Application of Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Principles to Surgical Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic.通用学习设计(UDL)原则在新冠疫情期间外科教育中的应用
J Surg Educ. 2020 Sep-Oct;77(5):1008-1012. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.06.005. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
8
FES exam outcomes in year two of a proficiency-based endoscopic skills curriculum.基于能力的内镜技能课程第二年的 FES 考试结果。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):961-966. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06902-y. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
9
Simulation-based mastery learning significantly reduces gender differences on the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery performance exam.基于模拟的掌握学习显著减少了结直肠外科内镜手术操作基础考试中的性别差异。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Dec;32(12):5006-5011. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6313-y. Epub 2018 Jul 16.
针对美国胃肠内镜外科医师学会(SAGES)内镜操作技能培训(STEP)项目的基于熟练程度的技能培训课程。
J Surg Educ. 2014 May-Jun;71(3):282-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.10.004. Epub 2014 Jan 4.
4
What surgical skills rural surgeons need to master.乡村外科医师需要掌握的外科技能。
J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Nov;217(5):919-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.001. Epub 2013 Sep 13.
5
A multicenter, simulation-based skills training collaborative using shared GI Mentor II systems: results from the Texas Association of Surgical Skills Laboratories (TASSL) flexible endoscopy curriculum.多中心、基于模拟的技能培训合作,使用共享的 GI Mentor II 系统:来自德克萨斯州外科技能实验室协会 (TASSL) 软性内镜课程的结果。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Sep;25(9):2980-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1656-7. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
6
Testing the construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II virtual reality colonoscopy simulator metrics: module matters.测试 Simbionix GI Mentor II 虚拟现实结肠镜模拟器指标的结构效度:模块很重要。
Surg Endosc. 2010 May;24(5):1060-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0726-6. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
7
Proficiency-based laparoscopic and endoscopic training with virtual reality simulators: a comparison of proctored and independent approaches.基于熟练度的腹腔镜和内镜训练与虚拟现实模拟器:有监督和独立方法的比较。
J Surg Educ. 2009 Jul-Aug;66(4):201-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2009.07.007.
8
A comparison of faculty and resident perception of resident learning needs in the operating room.教员与住院医师对手术室住院医师学习需求认知的比较。
J Surg Educ. 2007 Sep-Oct;64(5):250-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.07.007.
9
Rural versus non-rural differences in surgeon performed endoscopy: results of a national survey.外科医生实施的内镜检查在农村与非农村地区的差异:一项全国性调查结果
Am Surg. 2007 Sep;73(9):903-5.
10
Expert and construct validity of the Simbionix GI Mentor II endoscopy simulator for colonoscopy.Simbionix GI Mentor II结肠镜检查模拟器的专家效度和结构效度
Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):158-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9394-6. Epub 2007 May 22.