Oberoi Kurun Partap S, Scott Michael T, Schwartzman Jacob, Mahajan Jasmine, Patel Nell Maloney, Alvarez-Downing Melissa M, Merchant Aziz M, Kunac Anastasia
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Surg J (N Y). 2022 Mar 3;8(1):e80-e85. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1743517. eCollection 2022 Jan.
Endoscopy training has become increasingly emphasized during general surgery residency as reflected by introduction of the Fundamentals of Endoscopic Surgery (FES) examination, which includes testing of skills on virtual reality (VR) simulators. Although studies exist to assess the ability of the simulator to differentiate between novices and experienced endoscopists, it is not well understood how simulators can differentiate skills among resident cohort. To assess the utility of the VR simulator, we evaluated the correlation between resident endoscopy experience and performance on two VR simulator colonoscopy modules on the GI-BRONCH Mentor (Simbionix Ltd, Airport City, Israel). Postgraduate years 2 to 5 residents completed "easy" and "difficult" VR colonoscopies, and performance metrics were recorded from October 2017 to February 2018 at Rutgers' two general surgery residency programs. Resident endoscopy experience was obtained through Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education case logs. Correlations between resident endoscopy experience and VR colonoscopy performance metrics were assessed using Spearman's rho (ρ) correlation statistic and bivariate logistic regression. Fifty-five residents out of 65 (84.6%) eligible participants completed the study. There were limited correlations found between resident endoscopy experience and FES performance metrics and no correlations were found between resident endoscopy experience and binary metrics of colonoscopy-ability to complete colonoscopy, ability to retroflex, and withdrawal time of less than 6 minutes. The VR simulator may have a limited ability to discriminate between experience levels among resident cohort. Future studies are needed to further understand how well the VR simulator metrics correlate with resident endoscopy experience.
随着《内镜手术基础》(FES)考试的引入,普通外科住院医师培训期间对内镜检查培训的重视程度日益提高,该考试包括对虚拟现实(VR)模拟器技能的测试。尽管已有研究评估模拟器区分新手和经验丰富的内镜医师的能力,但对于模拟器如何区分住院医师群体中的技能水平尚不清楚。
为了评估VR模拟器的效用,我们评估了住院医师内镜检查经验与在GI-BRONCH Mentor(以色列机场城的Simbionix Ltd公司)上的两个VR模拟器结肠镜检查模块的表现之间的相关性。
2至5年级的住院医师完成了“简单”和“困难”的VR结肠镜检查,并于2017年10月至2018年2月在罗格斯大学的两个普通外科住院医师培训项目中记录了表现指标。住院医师的内镜检查经验通过研究生医学教育认证委员会的病例记录获得。使用Spearman等级相关系数(ρ)统计量和二元逻辑回归评估住院医师内镜检查经验与VR结肠镜检查表现指标之间的相关性。
65名符合条件的参与者中有55名(84.6%)完成了研究。住院医师内镜检查经验与FES表现指标之间的相关性有限,住院医师内镜检查经验与结肠镜检查的二元指标(完成结肠镜检查的能力、反转能力和少于6分钟的退出时间)之间未发现相关性。
VR模拟器区分住院医师群体经验水平的能力可能有限。需要进一步的研究来更好地理解VR模拟器指标与住院医师内镜检查经验之间的相关性。