• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种关于拒绝敏感性的多层面人际环型评估

A Multisurface Interpersonal Circumplex Assessment of Rejection Sensitivity.

作者信息

Cain Nicole M, De Panfilis Chiara, Meehan Kevin B, Clarkin John F

机构信息

a Department of Psychology , Long Island University-Brooklyn.

b Department of Neuroscience , Unit of Psychiatry, University of Parma , Italy.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2017 Jan-Feb;99(1):35-45. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1186032. Epub 2016 Jun 13.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2016.1186032
PMID:27292201
Abstract

Individuals high in rejection sensitivity (RS) are at risk for experiencing high levels of interpersonal distress, yet little is known about the interpersonal profiles associated with RS. This investigation examined the interpersonal problems, sensitivities, and values associated with RS in 2 samples: 763 multicultural undergraduate students (Study 1) and 365 community adults (Study 2). In Study 1, high anxious RS was associated with socially avoidant interpersonal problems, whereas low anxious RS was associated with vindictive interpersonal problems. In Study 2, we assessed both anxious and angry expectations of rejection. Circumplex profile analyses showed that the high anxious RS group reported socially avoidant interpersonal problems, sensitivities to remoteness in others, and valuing connections with others, whereas the high angry RS group reported vindictive interpersonal problems, sensitivities to submissiveness in others, and valuing detached interpersonal behavior. Low anxious RS was related to domineering interpersonal problems, sensitivity to attention-seeking behavior, and valuing detached interpersonal behavior, whereas low angry RS was related to submissive interpersonal problems, sensitivity to attention-seeking behavior, and valuing receiving approval from others. Overall, results suggest that there are distinct interpersonal profiles associated with varying levels and types of RS.

摘要

高拒绝敏感性(RS)的个体面临着人际困扰程度较高的风险,但对于与RS相关的人际特征却知之甚少。本研究在两个样本中考察了与RS相关的人际问题、敏感性和价值观:763名多元文化本科生(研究1)和365名社区成年人(研究2)。在研究1中,高焦虑RS与社交回避型人际问题相关,而低焦虑RS与报复型人际问题相关。在研究2中,我们评估了对拒绝的焦虑和愤怒预期。环形轮廓分析表明,高焦虑RS组报告了社交回避型人际问题、对他人冷漠的敏感性以及重视与他人的联系,而高愤怒RS组报告了报复型人际问题、对他人顺从的敏感性以及重视疏离的人际行为。低焦虑RS与专横型人际问题、对寻求关注行为的敏感性以及重视疏离的人际行为相关,而低愤怒RS与顺从型人际问题、对寻求关注行为的敏感性以及重视获得他人认可相关。总体而言,结果表明,与不同水平和类型的RS相关存在不同的人际特征。

相似文献

1
A Multisurface Interpersonal Circumplex Assessment of Rejection Sensitivity.一种关于拒绝敏感性的多层面人际环型评估
J Pers Assess. 2017 Jan-Feb;99(1):35-45. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1186032. Epub 2016 Jun 13.
2
The effects of rejection sensitivity on reactive and proactive aggression.拒绝敏感性对反应性攻击和主动性攻击的影响。
Aggress Behav. 2013 Jan;39(1):3-12. doi: 10.1002/ab.21455. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
3
Effortful Control, Rejection Sensitivity, and Borderline Personality Disorder Features in Adulthood.成年期的努力控制、拒绝敏感性与边缘型人格障碍特征
J Pers Disord. 2016 Oct;30(5):595-612. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2015_29_226. Epub 2015 Dec 1.
4
A Longitudinal Rejection Sensitivity Model of Depression and Aggression: Unique Roles of Anxiety, Anger, Blame, Withdrawal and Retribution.抑郁与攻击行为的纵向拒绝敏感性模型:焦虑、愤怒、责备、退缩和报复的独特作用。
J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2016 Oct;44(7):1291-307. doi: 10.1007/s10802-016-0127-y.
5
Anxious and angry rejection sensitivity, social withdrawal, and retribution in high and low ambiguous situations.在高、低模糊情境下,焦虑愤怒的拒绝敏感性、社会回避和报复。
J Pers. 2013 Feb;81(1):29-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00792.x. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
6
Differences between self- and peer ratings of interpersonal problems.人际问题的自我评估与同伴评估之间的差异。
Assessment. 1998 Mar;5(1):67-84. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500109.
7
Rejection sensitivity and children's interpersonal difficulties.拒绝敏感性与儿童的人际困难。
Child Dev. 1998 Aug;69(4):1074-91.
8
Regulating the interpersonal self: strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity.调节人际自我:应对拒绝敏感性的策略性自我调节
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2000 Nov;79(5):776-92. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.79.5.776.
9
Rejection sensitivity, interpersonal rejection, and attention for emotional facial expressions.拒绝敏感性、人际拒绝与对情绪化面部表情的关注。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Jun;59:31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
10
Rejection sensitivity and social outcomes of young adult men with ADHD.患有注意力缺陷多动障碍的青年男性的拒绝敏感性与社交结果
J Atten Disord. 2007 Feb;10(3):261-75. doi: 10.1177/1087054706288106.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between psychological traits and the use of smart medical services in young and middle-aged adults: An observational study.中青年人群心理特质与智能医疗服务使用之间的相关性:一项观察性研究。
World J Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 19;14(8):1224-1232. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v14.i8.1224.
2
Using Dispositions to Understand Otherwise Intractable Causal Pathways to Psychological Problems During Childhood and Adolescence.利用倾向理解儿童和青少年时期心理问题难以捉摸的因果途径。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2024 Mar-Apr;53(2):328-341. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2023.2292050. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
3
Are there negative cycles of peer victimization and rejection sensitivity? Testing ri-CLPMs in two longitudinal samples of young adolescents.
同伴侵害和拒绝敏感性是否存在负向循环?在两个青少年纵向样本中检验 ri-CLPMs。
Dev Psychopathol. 2024 May;36(2):844-856. doi: 10.1017/S0954579423000123. Epub 2023 Feb 16.
4
Examining Schizotypal Personality Scales Within and Across Interpersonal Circumplex Surfaces.在人际双相情感环内和跨人际双相情感环检验精神分裂型人格量表。
Assessment. 2023 Oct;30(7):2296-2317. doi: 10.1177/10731911221143354. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
5
Adolescent Popularity: Distinct Profiles and Associations with Excessive Internet Usage and Interpersonal Sensitivity.青少年的受欢迎程度:不同的类型与过度使用互联网和人际敏感的关系。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2022 Dec;53(6):1097-1109. doi: 10.1007/s10578-021-01194-7. Epub 2021 May 25.
6
Development and Validation of a Circumplex Measure of the Interpersonal Culture in Work Teams and Organizations.工作团队与组织中人际文化的环形测量方法的开发与验证
Front Psychol. 2019 May 1;10:850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00850. eCollection 2019.