Hill R W, Zrull M C, McIntire K
Appalachian State University.
Assessment. 1998 Mar;5(1):67-84. doi: 10.1177/107319119800500109.
Interpersonal problems are frequently a source of distress for individuals and the focus of psychotherapeutic interventions. A self-report circumplex measure, the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems Circumplex (IIP-C), was modified for this investigation to acquire peer report data on interpersonal problems to help assess the validity of self-reported problems. The peer report data replicated the circumplex model of the IIP-C and when general interpersonal distress was removed (by ipsatizing), the data suggested that peers observed more domineering, vindictive, and emotionally cold types of problems than self-report (ipsatized) data. Individuals reported more other-pleasing, overly nurturant types of problems than peers observed. The findings both support the validity of the IIP-C and describe discrepancies in self- versus peer reported interpersonal problems. The results also describe differences in the general interpersonal distress factor accounted for by ipsatizing versus removing the general factor from unipsatized data. The results describe implications for clinicians and others assessing interpersonal problems.
人际问题常常是个体痛苦的来源，也是心理治疗干预的重点。为了本次调查，对一种自陈式环形量表——人际问题环形量表（IIP-C）进行了修改，以获取关于人际问题的同伴报告数据，从而帮助评估自陈问题的有效性。同伴报告数据复制了IIP-C的环形模型，并且当去除一般人际困扰（通过均数化）后，数据表明同伴观察到的专横、报复性和情感冷漠型问题比自陈（均数化）数据更多。个体报告的讨好他人、过度呵护型问题比同伴观察到的更多。这些发现既支持了IIP-C的有效性，也描述了自陈与同伴报告的人际问题之间的差异。结果还描述了通过均数化与从未均数化数据中去除一般因素所导致的一般人际困扰因素的差异。结果阐述了对临床医生和其他评估人际问题的人员的启示。
