Suppr超能文献

经内路与经外路人工晶状体巩膜固定术的超声生物显微镜比较

Ultrasound Biomicroscopy Comparison of Ab Interno and Ab Externo Intraocular Lens Scleral Fixation.

作者信息

Horiguchi Lie, Garcia Patricia Novita, Malavazzi Gustavo Ricci, Allemann Norma, Gomes Rachel L R

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Department of Ophthalmology, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil; Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:9375091. doi: 10.1155/2016/9375091. Epub 2016 May 18.

Abstract

Purpose. To compare ab interno and ab externo scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PCIOL) using ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM). Methods. Randomized patients underwent ab externo or ab interno scleral fixation of a PCIOL. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed 3 to 6 months postoperatively, to determine PCIOL centration, IOL distance to the iris at 12, 3, 6, and 9 hours, and haptics placement in relation to the ciliary sulcus. Results. Fifteen patients were enrolled in the study. The ab externo technique was used in 7 eyes (46.6%) and the ab interno in 8 eyes (53.3%). In the ab externo technique, 14 haptics were located: 4 (28.57%) in the ciliary sulcus; 2 (14.28%) anterior to the sulcus; and 8 (57.14%) posterior to the sulcus, 6 in the ciliary body and 2 posterior to the ciliary body. In the ab interno group, 4 haptics (25.0%) were in the ciliary sulcus, 2 (12.50%) anterior to the sulcus, and 10 (75.0%) posterior to the sulcus, 4 in the ciliary body and 6 posterior to the ciliary body. Conclusions. Ab externo and ab interno scleral fixation techniques presented similar results in haptic placement. Ab externo technique presented higher vertical tilt when compared to the ab interno.

摘要

目的。使用超声生物显微镜(UBM)比较后房型人工晶状体(PCIOL)的经巩膜外固定和经巩膜内固定。方法。随机选取患者接受PCIOL的经巩膜外固定或经巩膜内固定。术后3至6个月进行超声生物显微镜检查,以确定PCIOL的中心定位、在12点、3点、6点和9点处人工晶状体与虹膜的距离,以及襻相对于睫状沟的位置。结果。15名患者纳入本研究。7只眼(46.6%)采用经巩膜外技术,8只眼(53.3%)采用经巩膜内技术。在经巩膜外技术中,确定了14个襻的位置:4个(28.57%)位于睫状沟;2个(14.28%)位于沟前方;以及8个(57.14%)位于沟后方,6个在睫状体,2个在睫状体后方。在经巩膜内组中,4个襻(25.0%)位于睫状沟,2个(12.50%)位于沟前方,10个(75.0%)位于沟后方,4个在睫状体,6个在睫状体后方。结论。经巩膜外固定和经巩膜内固定技术在襻的位置方面呈现相似的结果。与经巩膜内技术相比,经巩膜外技术呈现出更高的垂直倾斜度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1d89/4887626/6aefa08195af/JOPH2016-9375091.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验