• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于基因检测和家族健康史的风险咨询对2型糖尿病行为改变和认知先兆的影响。

Impact of Genetic Testing and Family Health History Based Risk Counseling on Behavior Change and Cognitive Precursors for Type 2 Diabetes.

作者信息

Wu R Ryanne, Myers Rachel A, Hauser Elizabeth R, Vorderstrasse Allison, Cho Alex, Ginsburg Geoffrey S, Orlando Lori A

机构信息

Center for Applied Genomics and Precision Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Department of Medicine, Duke University, 411 West Chapel Hill St., Suite 500, Durham, NC, 27701, USA.

出版信息

J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9988-z. Epub 2016 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s10897-016-9988-z
PMID:27296809
Abstract

Family health history (FHH) in the context of risk assessment has been shown to positively impact risk perception and behavior change. The added value of genetic risk testing is less certain. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) FHH and genetic risk counseling on behavior and its cognitive precursors. Subjects were non-diabetic patients randomized to counseling that included FHH +/- T2D genetic testing. Measurements included weight, BMI, fasting glucose at baseline and 12 months and behavioral and cognitive precursor (T2D risk perception and control over disease development) surveys at baseline, 3, and 12 months. 391 subjects enrolled of which 312 completed the study. Behavioral and clinical outcomes did not differ across FHH or genetic risk but cognitive precursors did. Higher FHH risk was associated with a stronger perceived T2D risk (p < 0.001) and with a perception of "serious" risk (p < 0.001). Genetic risk did not influence risk perception, but was correlated with an increase in perception of "serious" risk for moderate (p = 0.04) and average FHH risk subjects (p = 0.01), though not for the high FHH risk group. Perceived control over T2D risk was high and not affected by FHH or genetic risk. FHH appears to have a strong impact on cognitive precursors of behavior change, suggesting it could be leveraged to enhance risk counseling, particularly when lifestyle change is desirable. Genetic risk was able to alter perceptions about the seriousness of T2D risk in those with moderate and average FHH risk, suggesting that FHH could be used to selectively identify individuals who may benefit from genetic risk testing.

摘要

在风险评估背景下,家族健康史(FHH)已被证明对风险认知和行为改变有积极影响。基因风险检测的附加价值则不太确定。本研究的目的是确定2型糖尿病(T2D)家族健康史和基因风险咨询对行为及其认知先兆的影响。研究对象为非糖尿病患者,他们被随机分配接受包含家族健康史±T2D基因检测的咨询。测量指标包括体重、体重指数(BMI)、基线和12个月时的空腹血糖,以及在基线、3个月和12个月时进行的行为和认知先兆(T2D风险认知以及对疾病发展的控制感)调查。共有391名受试者入组,其中312名完成了研究。行为和临床结果在家族健康史或基因风险方面并无差异,但认知先兆存在差异。较高的家族健康史风险与更强的T2D风险认知相关(p<0.001),也与“严重”风险认知相关(p<0.001)。基因风险并未影响风险认知,但与中度(p = 0.04)和平均家族健康史风险受试者(p = 0.01)的“严重”风险认知增加相关,不过高家族健康史风险组未出现这种情况。对T2D风险的控制感较高,且不受家族健康史或基因风险的影响。家族健康史似乎对行为改变的认知先兆有强烈影响,这表明可以利用它来加强风险咨询,特别是在希望改变生活方式的情况下。基因风险能够改变中度和平均家族健康史风险人群对T2D风险严重性的认知,这表明家族健康史可用于选择性地识别可能从基因风险检测中获益的个体。

相似文献

1
Impact of Genetic Testing and Family Health History Based Risk Counseling on Behavior Change and Cognitive Precursors for Type 2 Diabetes.基于基因检测和家族健康史的风险咨询对2型糖尿病行为改变和认知先兆的影响。
J Genet Couns. 2017 Feb;26(1):133-140. doi: 10.1007/s10897-016-9988-z. Epub 2016 Jun 14.
2
Does Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing and Counseling Reduce Modifiable Risk Factors? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Veterans.2型糖尿病基因检测与咨询能否降低可改变的风险因素?一项针对退伍军人的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1591-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3315-5. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
3
Design of a randomized trial of diabetes genetic risk testing to motivate behavior change: the Genetic Counseling/lifestyle Change (GC/LC) Study for Diabetes Prevention.糖尿病遗传风险检测以促进行为改变的随机试验设计:预防糖尿病的遗传咨询/生活方式改变(GC/LC)研究。
Clin Trials. 2011 Oct;8(5):609-15. doi: 10.1177/1740774511414159.
4
Effect of communicating genetic and phenotypic risk for type 2 diabetes in combination with lifestyle advice on objectively measured physical activity: protocol of a randomised controlled trial.联合生活方式建议沟通 2 型糖尿病遗传和表型风险对客观测量身体活动的影响:一项随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jun 18;12:444. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-444.
5
Effect of genetic testing for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus on health behaviors and outcomes: study rationale, development and design.2 型糖尿病风险基因检测对健康行为和结果的影响:研究背景、方法和设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 18;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-16.
6
Examining the impact of genetic testing for type 2 diabetes on health behaviors: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.探讨 2 型糖尿病基因检测对健康行为的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2012 Aug 1;13:121. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-121.
7
Familial risk for lifestyle-related chronic diseases: can family health history be used as a motivational tool to promote health behaviour in young adults?与生活方式相关的慢性病的家族风险:家族健康史能否作为促进年轻人健康行为的激励工具?
Health Promot J Austr. 2015 Aug;26(2):122-128. doi: 10.1071/HE14104.
8
Protocol for a randomized controlled trial testing the impact of feedback on familial risk of chronic diseases on family-level intentions to participate in preventive lifestyle behaviors.一项随机对照试验的方案,该试验旨在测试关于慢性病家族风险的反馈对家庭层面参与预防性生活方式行为意愿的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;16(1):965. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3623-7.
9
Impact of genetic risk information and type of disease on perceived risk, anticipated affect, and expected consequences of genetic tests.遗传风险信息和疾病类型对基因检测的感知风险、预期情感及预期后果的影响。
Health Psychol. 2009 May;28(3):307-16. doi: 10.1037/a0013947.
10
Factors Influencing Not Perceiving Family Health History Assessments as Important: Opportunities to Improve Dissemination of Evidence-Based Population Screening for Cancer.影响不将家族健康史评估视为重要事项的因素:改善基于证据的癌症人群筛查传播的机遇
Public Health Genomics. 2018;21(3-4):144-153. doi: 10.1159/000499125. Epub 2019 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Additive interaction of family medical history of diabetes with hypertension on the diagnosis of diabetes among older adults in India: longitudinal ageing study in India.印度老年人中糖尿病家族史与高血压的相加交互作用对糖尿病的诊断:印度纵向老龄化研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 10;24(1):999. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18146-0.
2
Perception of inherited risk in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review.2型糖尿病遗传风险认知:一项系统综述
Front Public Health. 2023 Dec 14;11:1293874. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1293874. eCollection 2023.
3
Advancing the communication of genetic risk for cardiometabolic diseases: a critical interpretive synthesis.

本文引用的文献

1
Does Type 2 Diabetes Genetic Testing and Counseling Reduce Modifiable Risk Factors? A Randomized Controlled Trial of Veterans.2型糖尿病基因检测与咨询能否降低可改变的风险因素?一项针对退伍军人的随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Nov;30(11):1591-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3315-5. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
2
Personalized genetic risk counseling to motivate diabetes prevention: a randomized trial.个性化遗传风险咨询以促进糖尿病预防:一项随机试验。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jan;36(1):13-9. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0884. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
3
Effect of genetic testing for risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus on health behaviors and outcomes: study rationale, development and design.
推进心血管代谢疾病遗传风险的交流:批判性综合解读。
BMC Med. 2023 Nov 13;21(1):432. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-03150-9.
4
Measurement of Perceived Risk of Developing Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Literature Review.糖尿病患病风险感知的测量:系统文献综述。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Jun;38(8):1928-1954. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08164-w. Epub 2023 Apr 10.
5
A Novel Gene CDC27 Causes SLE and Is Associated With the Disease Activity.一种新基因 CDC27 导致 SLE 并与疾病活动相关。
Front Immunol. 2022 Mar 28;13:876963. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.876963. eCollection 2022.
6
Association between Organophosphate Pesticide Exposure and Insulin Resistance in Pesticide Sprayers and Nonfarmworkers.有机磷农药暴露与喷药工人和非农业工人胰岛素抵抗的关联。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 4;17(21):8140. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218140.
7
Concepts Driving Pharmacogenomics Implementation Into Everyday Healthcare.推动药物基因组学应用于日常医疗保健的概念。
Pharmgenomics Pers Med. 2019 Oct 30;12:305-318. doi: 10.2147/PGPM.S193185. eCollection 2019.
8
Toward the implementation of genomic applications for smoking cessation and smoking-related diseases.朝着实现基因组应用以戒烟和与吸烟相关的疾病的方向努力。
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):7-17. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx060.
9
Heart disease risk information, encouragement, and physical activity among Mexican-origin couples: Self- or spouse-driven change?墨西哥裔夫妇的心脏病风险信息、鼓励和身体活动:是自我驱动还是配偶驱动的改变?
Transl Behav Med. 2018 Jan 29;8(1):95-104. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibx012.
2 型糖尿病风险基因检测对健康行为和结果的影响:研究背景、方法和设计。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jan 18;12:16. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-16.
4
Changing the odds. What do we learn from prevention studies targeted at people with a positive family history of type 2 diabetes?改变几率。我们从针对有 2 型糖尿病阳性家族史人群的预防研究中学到了什么?
Prim Care Diabetes. 2011 Dec;5(4):215-21. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2011.06.004. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
5
Effects of communicating DNA-based disease risk estimates on risk-reducing behaviours.传达基于DNA的疾病风险评估对降低风险行为的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6(10):CD007275. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007275.pub2.
6
Genetic risk reclassification for type 2 diabetes by age below or above 50 years using 40 type 2 diabetes risk single nucleotide polymorphisms.使用 40 个 2 型糖尿病风险单核苷酸多态性对年龄低于或高于 50 岁的 2 型糖尿病进行遗传风险重新分类。
Diabetes Care. 2011 Jan;34(1):121-5. doi: 10.2337/dc10-1265. Epub 2010 Oct 1.
7
Using family history information to promote healthy lifestyles and prevent diseases; a discussion of the evidence.利用家族病史信息促进健康生活方式和预防疾病;对证据的讨论。
BMC Public Health. 2010 May 13;10:248. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-248.
8
A systematic review of selected interventions for worksite health promotion. The assessment of health risks with feedback.一项针对工作场所健康促进选定干预措施的系统评价。健康风险评估与反馈。
Am J Prev Med. 2010 Feb;38(2 Suppl):S237-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2009.10.030.
9
10-year follow-up of diabetes incidence and weight loss in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.糖尿病预防计划结果研究中糖尿病发病率和体重减轻的10年随访
Lancet. 2009 Nov 14;374(9702):1677-86. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61457-4. Epub 2009 Oct 29.
10
Joint effects of common genetic variants on the risk for type 2 diabetes in U.S. men and women of European ancestry.常见基因变异对美国欧洲裔男性和女性患2型糖尿病风险的联合影响。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 21;150(8):541-50. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-8-200904210-00008.