Suppr超能文献

食管癌切除术后的出院后并发症导致了较高的再入院率。

Post-discharge complications after esophagectomy account for high readmission rates.

作者信息

Chen Sophia Y, Molena Daniela, Stem Miloslawa, Mungo Benedetto, Lidor Anne O

机构信息

Sophia Y Chen, Miloslawa Stem, Benedetto Mungo, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, United States.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 14;22(22):5246-53. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i22.5246.

Abstract

AIM

To identify rates of post-discharge complications (PDC), associated risk factors, and their influence on early hospital outcomes after esophagectomy.

METHODS

We used the 2005-2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database to identify patients ≥ 18 years of age who underwent an esophagectomy. These procedures were categorized into four operative approaches: transhiatal, Ivor-Lewis, 3-holes, and non-gastric conduit. We selected patient data based on clinical relevance to patients undergoing esophagectomy and compared demographic and clinical characteristics. The primary outcome was PDC, and secondary outcomes were hospital readmission and reoperation. The patients were then divided in 3 groups: no complication (Group 1), only pre-discharge complication (Group 2), and PDC patients (Group 3). A modified Poisson regression analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with developing post-discharge complication, and risk ratios were estimated.

RESULTS

4483 total patients were identified, with 8.9% developing PDC within 30-d after esophagectomy. Patients who experienced complications post-discharge had a median initial hospital length of stay (LOS) of 9 d; however, PDC occurred on average 14 d following surgery. Patients with PDC had greater rates of wound infection (41.0% vs 19.3%, P < 0.001), venous thromboembolism (16.3% vs 8.9%, P < 0.001), and organ space surgical site infection (17.1% vs 11.0%, P = 0.001) than patients with pre-discharge complication. The readmission rate in our entire population was 12.8%. PDC patients were overwhelmingly more likely to have a reoperation (39.5% vs 22.4%, P < 0.001) and readmission (66.9% vs 6.6%, P < 0.001). BMI 25-29.9 and BMI ≥ 30 were associated with increased risk of PDC compared to normal BMI (18.5-25).

CONCLUSION

PDC after esophagectomy account for significant number of reoperations and readmissions. Efforts should be directed towards optimizing patient's health pre-discharge, with possible prevention programs at discharge.

摘要

目的

确定食管癌切除术后出院后并发症(PDC)的发生率、相关危险因素及其对早期住院结局的影响。

方法

我们使用2005 - 2013年美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划(ACS - NSQIP)数据库,识别年龄≥18岁且接受食管癌切除术的患者。这些手术被分为四种手术方式:经裂孔、Ivor - Lewis、三孔法和非胃代食管。我们根据与接受食管癌切除术患者的临床相关性选择患者数据,并比较人口统计学和临床特征。主要结局是PDC,次要结局是再次入院和再次手术。然后将患者分为3组:无并发症(第1组)、仅出院前有并发症(第2组)和PDC患者(第3组)。采用改良泊松回归分析确定与出院后并发症发生相关的危险因素,并估计风险比。

结果

共识别出4483例患者,其中8.9%在食管癌切除术后30天内发生PDC。出院后发生并发症的患者初始住院中位时长(LOS)为9天;然而,PDC平均在术后14天发生。与出院前有并发症的患者相比,PDC患者的伤口感染发生率更高(41.0%对19.3%,P < 0.001)、静脉血栓栓塞发生率更高(16.3%对8.9%,P < 0.001)以及器官腔隙手术部位感染发生率更高(17.1%对11.0%,P = 0.001)。我们总体人群的再入院率为12.8%。PDC患者进行再次手术(39.5%对22.4%,P < 0.001)和再次入院(66.9%对6.6%,P < 0.001)的可能性要大得多。与正常体重指数(18.5 - 25)相比,体重指数25 - 29.9和体重指数≥30与PDC风险增加相关。

结论

食管癌切除术后的PDC导致大量再次手术和再次入院。应致力于优化患者出院前的健康状况,并在出院时开展可能的预防项目。

相似文献

1
Post-discharge complications after esophagectomy account for high readmission rates.
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jun 14;22(22):5246-53. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i22.5246.
3
Women undergoing aortic surgery are at higher risk for unplanned readmissions compared with men especially when discharged home.
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jun;63(6):1496-1504.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.054. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
Why are patients being readmitted after surgery for esophageal cancer?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 May;149(5):1384-9; discussion 1389-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.064. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
6
How Safe Is the Safety Net? Comparison of Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy at a Safety-Net Hospital Using the NSQIP Database.
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):680-684. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.12.036. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
7
Incidence and risk factors for respiratory complications in patients undergoing esophagectomy for malignancy: a NSQIP analysis.
Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Winter;26(4):287-94. doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2014.12.002. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
8
9
Predictors of length of stay, reoperation, and readmission following total laryngectomy.
Laryngoscope. 2017 Jun;127(6):1339-1344. doi: 10.1002/lary.26454. Epub 2016 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Can Risk-Based Thromboprophylaxis Practice Guidelines be Safely Used in Esophagectomy Cases? Experience of an Academic Health System.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Oct;27(10):2045-2056. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05815-5. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
2
Risk stratification of postoperative cardiopulmonary toxicity after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer.
Front Oncol. 2023 Feb 9;13:1081024. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1081024. eCollection 2023.
3
Short-term and intermediate-term readmission after esophagectomy.
J Thorac Dis. 2021 Aug;13(8):4678-4689. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-637.
4
Reoperative Surgery After Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2021 Sep 9;32(1):60-65. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000996.
5
Barriers to Post-Discharge Monitoring and Patient-Clinician Communication: A Qualitative Study.
J Surg Res. 2021 Dec;268:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.06.032. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
7
Readmission after esophageal resection for esophageal cancer: incidence and risk factors.
J Thorac Dis. 2020 Sep;12(9):4608-4611. doi: 10.21037/jtd-20-1670.
8
Length of hospital stay after uncomplicated esophagectomy. Hospital variation shows room for nationwide improvement.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6344-6357. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08103-4. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
9
10
Time Spent Away from Home in the Year Following High-Risk Cancer Surgery in Older Adults.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Mar;68(3):505-510. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16344. Epub 2020 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
2
Influence of body mass index on outcomes after major resection for cancer.
Surgery. 2015 Aug;158(2):472-85. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.02.023. Epub 2015 May 23.
3
Why are patients being readmitted after surgery for esophageal cancer?
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 May;149(5):1384-9; discussion 1389-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.01.064. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
4
Readmission and risk factors for readmission following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Apr;19(4):581-5; discussion 586. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2756-9. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
5
Is a low readmission rate indicative of a good hospital?
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Feb;220(2):169-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
6
Hospital readmission is associated with poor survival after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;99(1):292-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.052. Epub 2014 Nov 11.
7
A high body mass index in esophageal cancer patients is not associated with adverse outcomes following esophagectomy.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 May;141(5):941-50. doi: 10.1007/s00432-014-1878-x. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
8
The impact of body mass index on esophageal cancer.
Cancer Control. 2013 Apr;20(2):138-43. doi: 10.1177/107327481302000207.
9
Readmission rates and cost following colorectal surgery.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2011 Dec;54(12):1475-9. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31822ff8f0.
10
A high body mass index in esophageal cancer patients does not influence postoperative outcome or long-term survival.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;19(3):766-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-2103-7. Epub 2011 Oct 7.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验