Beketayev Kenes, Runco Mark A
Nazarbayev University, Astana, Kazakhstan; Sparcit, Inc., Davis, CA, USA.
American Institute of Behavioral Research & Technology, Vista, CA, USA.
Eur J Psychol. 2016 May 31;12(2):210-20. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v12i2.1127. eCollection 2016 May.
Divergent thinking (DT) tests are useful for the assessment of creative potentials. This article reports the semantics-based algorithmic (SBA) method for assessing DT. This algorithm is fully automated: Examinees receive DT questions on a computer or mobile device and their ideas are immediately compared with norms and semantic networks. This investigation compared the scores generated by the SBA method with the traditional methods of scoring DT (i.e., fluency, originality, and flexibility). Data were collected from 250 examinees using the "Many Uses Test" of DT. The most important finding involved the flexibility scores from both scoring methods. This was critical because semantic networks are based on conceptual structures, and thus a high SBA score should be highly correlated with the traditional flexibility score from DT tests. Results confirmed this correlation (r = .74). This supports the use of algorithmic scoring of DT. The nearly-immediate computation time required by SBA method may make it the method of choice, especially when it comes to moderate- and large-scale DT assessment investigations. Correlations between SBA scores and GPA were insignificant, providing evidence of the discriminant and construct validity of SBA scores. Limitations of the present study and directions for future research are offered.
发散性思维(DT)测试对于评估创造潜力很有用。本文报告了用于评估DT的基于语义的算法(SBA)方法。该算法完全自动化:考生在计算机或移动设备上接收DT问题,他们的想法会立即与规范和语义网络进行比较。本研究将SBA方法生成的分数与传统的DT评分方法(即流畅性、独创性和灵活性)进行了比较。使用DT的“多种用途测试”从250名考生那里收集了数据。最重要的发现涉及两种评分方法的灵活性分数。这很关键,因为语义网络基于概念结构,因此SBA的高分应该与DT测试中传统的灵活性分数高度相关。结果证实了这种相关性(r = 0.74)。这支持了DT的算法评分的使用。SBA方法所需的几乎即时的计算时间可能使其成为首选方法,尤其是在进行中大规模DT评估研究时。SBA分数与GPA之间的相关性不显著,这为SBA分数的区分效度和结构效度提供了证据。本文还提供了本研究的局限性和未来研究的方向。