Ruan Qian-Nan, Ye Xin-Wu, Jia Sui-Lin, Liang Jing, Yan Wen-Jing, Huang Yao-Ju
Wenzhou Seventh People's Hospital, Wenzhou, China.
School of Educational Science, Ludong University, Yantai, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 21;12:704614. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.704614. eCollection 2021.
Previous studies have found that promoting multiple identities can improve children's creative performance (divergent thinking). The present study employed a priming paradigm to design two experiments and investigate whether promoting a sense of multiple identities in middle school students could enhance their divergent thinking, a key component of creativity. In Experiment 1, 77 junior high school students were divided into multiple identities and physical trait condition groups. They were instructed to think about a child with multiple identities or physical traits. The results showed that there were no differences in divergent thinking (DT) scores between the two groups. In Experiment 2, we modified the priming method by asking participants to think about and write a description of the various identities or physical traits and employed a subjective top-scoring method to make up for shortcomings in the traditional scoring method when applied to originality. The results still showed no significant difference in scores between the identity and physical trait groups. Thus, the results of this study contradict those of previous research, which found that the identity group demonstrated significantly higher scores on a creativity test than did those in the physical trait group. Several potential factors affect this outcome, but it seems that priming to enhance divergent thinking is not particularly effective. Thus, the social priming effect should be pursued with caution regarding both replicability and generalizability.
以往的研究发现,促进多重身份认同可以提高儿童的创造性表现(发散性思维)。本研究采用启动范式设计了两个实验,以探究在中学生中促进多重身份认同感是否能增强他们的发散性思维,这是创造力的一个关键组成部分。在实验1中,77名初中生被分为多重身份组和身体特征组。他们被要求思考一个具有多重身份或身体特征的孩子。结果显示,两组在发散性思维(DT)得分上没有差异。在实验2中,我们修改了启动方法,要求参与者思考并写下对各种身份或身体特征的描述,并采用主观高分法来弥补传统评分方法在应用于原创性时的不足。结果仍然显示,身份组和身体特征组在得分上没有显著差异。因此,本研究的结果与之前的研究结果相矛盾,之前的研究发现身份组在创造力测试中的得分显著高于身体特征组。有几个潜在因素影响了这一结果,但似乎通过启动来增强发散性思维并不是特别有效。因此,在可重复性和普遍性方面,对社会启动效应的追求应谨慎对待。