• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

左、右额下回经颅直流电刺激对创造性发散思维的影响受抑制控制变化的调节。

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Methods, Jacobs University Bremen, Bremen, Germany.

Department of Health Psychology and Neurorehabilitation, SRH Mobile University, Riedlingen, Germany.

出版信息

Brain Struct Funct. 2020 Jul;225(6):1691-1704. doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y. Epub 2020 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y
PMID:32556475
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7321900/
Abstract

Divergent thinking (DT) as one component of creativity is the ability to search for multiple solutions to a single problem and is reliably tested with the Alternative Uses Task (AUT). DT depends on activity in the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a prefrontal region that has also been associated with inhibitory control (IC). Experimentally manipulating IC through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) led to alterations in DT. Here, we aimed at further examining such potential mediating effects of IC on DT (measured as flexibility, fluency, and originality in the AUT) by modulating IC tDCS. Participants received either cathodal tDCS (c-tDCS) of the left IFG coupled with anodal tDCS (a-tDCS) of the right IFG (L-R + ; N = 19), or the opposite treatment (L + R-; N = 21). We hypothesized that L + R- stimulation would enhance IC assessed with the Go NoGo task (GNGT), and that facilitated IC would result in lower creativity scores. The reversed stimulation arrangement (i.e., L- R +) should result in higher creativity scores. We found that tDCS only affected the originality component of the AUT but not flexibility or fluency. We also found no effects on IC, and thus, the mediation effect of IC could not be confirmed. However, we observed a moderation effect: inhibition of left and facilitation of right IFG (L-R +) resulted in enhanced flexibility and originality scores, only when IC performance was also improved. We conclude that inducing a right-to-left gradient in IFG activity by tDCS is efficient in enhancing DT, but only under conditions where tDCS is sufficient to alter IC performance as well.

摘要

发散思维(DT)是创造力的一个组成部分,它是指能够搜索一个问题的多种解决方案的能力,并且可以通过替代用途任务(AUT)可靠地进行测试。DT 依赖于下额叶(IFG)的活动,这是一个与抑制控制(IC)相关的前额区域。通过经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)实验性地操纵 IC 会导致 DT 的改变。在这里,我们旨在通过调制 IC tDCS 进一步研究 IC 对 DT(在 AUT 中测量为灵活性、流畅性和新颖性)的潜在介导作用。参与者接受左侧 IFG 的阴极 tDCS(c-tDCS)与右侧 IFG 的阳极 tDCS(L-R+;N=19)联合治疗,或接受相反的治疗(L+R-;N=21)。我们假设 L+R-刺激会增强 Go NoGo 任务(GNGT)评估的 IC,并且促进的 IC 会导致创造力得分降低。相反的刺激安排(即 L-R+)应该会导致更高的创造力得分。我们发现 tDCS 仅影响 AUT 的原创性成分,而不影响灵活性或流畅性。我们也没有发现 IC 的影响,因此,不能确认 IC 的介导作用。然而,我们观察到了一种调节效应:当 IC 表现也得到改善时,抑制左侧和促进右侧 IFG(L-R+)会导致灵活性和原创性得分提高。我们的结论是,通过 tDCS 诱导 IFG 活动的从右到左梯度有效地增强了 DT,但仅在 tDCS 足以改变 IC 表现的情况下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/83cb0455e765/429_2020_2081_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/a87ff4f69a1c/429_2020_2081_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/c79898e51246/429_2020_2081_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/1bddfe96366c/429_2020_2081_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/1a9f79478923/429_2020_2081_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/83cb0455e765/429_2020_2081_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/a87ff4f69a1c/429_2020_2081_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/c79898e51246/429_2020_2081_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/1bddfe96366c/429_2020_2081_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/1a9f79478923/429_2020_2081_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab0b/7321900/83cb0455e765/429_2020_2081_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation of left and right inferior frontal gyrus on creative divergent thinking are moderated by changes in inhibition control.左、右额下回经颅直流电刺激对创造性发散思维的影响受抑制控制变化的调节。
Brain Struct Funct. 2020 Jul;225(6):1691-1704. doi: 10.1007/s00429-020-02081-y. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
2
Comparing transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus: Effects on divergent and convergent thinking.比较经颅直流电刺激和经颅随机噪声刺激对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层和左侧额下回的作用:对发散性思维和聚合性思维的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 3;16:997445. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.997445. eCollection 2022.
3
Individual differences and creative ideation: neuromodulatory signatures of mindset and response inhibition.个体差异与创造性思维:思维模式和反应抑制的神经调节特征
Front Neurosci. 2023 Dec 6;17:1238165. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1238165. eCollection 2023.
4
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the left inferior frontal gyrus: Effects on creativity across cultures.针对左侧额下回的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS):对不同文化背景下创造力的影响。
Soc Neurosci. 2019 Jun;14(3):277-285. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2018.1464505. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
5
Enhancing verbal creativity: modulating creativity by altering the balance between right and left inferior frontal gyrus with tDCS.增强言语创造力:通过经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)改变左右额下回之间的平衡来调节创造力。
Neuroscience. 2015 Apr 16;291:167-76. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.01.061. Epub 2015 Feb 7.
6
Modulation of creativity by transcranial direct current stimulation.经颅直流电刺激对创造力的调制。
Brain Stimul. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):1213-1221. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.06.004. Epub 2019 Jun 5.
7
Divergent thinking benefits from functional antagonism of the left IFG and right TPJ: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.左额下回和右颞顶叶区域的功能拮抗有助于发散思维:一项经颅直流电刺激研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jan 31;34(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad531.
8
Interaction of the Left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (l-DLPFC) and Right Orbitofrontal Cortex (OFC) in Hot and Cold Executive Functions: Evidence from Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS).左背外侧前额叶皮层(l-DLPFC)与右眶额皮层(OFC)在热执行功能和冷执行功能中的相互作用:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)的证据。
Neuroscience. 2018 Jan 15;369:109-123. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.10.042. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
9
The neural underpinnings of cross-cultural differences in creativity.跨文化创造力差异的神经基础。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2018 Nov;39(11):4493-4508. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24288. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
10
Transcranial direct current stimulation of bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex eliminates creativity impairment induced by acute stress.经颅直流电刺激双侧背外侧前额叶皮质可消除急性应激引起的创造力障碍。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2022 Jan;171:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2021.11.001. Epub 2021 Nov 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Near-infrared time-resolved spectroscopy reveals task-induced emotions by measuring cerebral blood oxygenation changes in the frontal pole during creative activity using a real object.近红外时间分辨光谱法通过测量使用真实物体进行创造性活动期间额极的脑血氧变化来揭示任务诱发的情绪。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2025 Jun 17;19:148-159. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2025.06.009. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
The impact of transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) on alpha coherence and verbal divergent thinking.经颅随机噪声刺激(tRNS)对α波相干性及言语发散性思维的影响。
Netw Neurosci. 2025 Apr 30;9(2):569-590. doi: 10.1162/netn_a_00446. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates response inhibition through dynamic modulation of the fronto-basal ganglia network.经颅直流电刺激通过动态调制额-基底神经节网络促进反应抑制。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):96-104. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.08.004. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
2
Cathodal tDCS increases stop-signal reaction time.阴极经颅直流电刺激会增加停止信号反应时间。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2019 Oct;19(5):1129-1142. doi: 10.3758/s13415-019-00740-0.
3
The Link Between Creativity, Cognition, and Creative Drives and Underlying Neural Mechanisms.
Emotion Induction Modulates Neural Dynamics Related to the Originality of Ideational Creativity.
情绪诱导调节与观念创造力原创性相关的神经动力学。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2025 Mar;46(4):e70182. doi: 10.1002/hbm.70182.
4
Transcranial direct current stimulation targeting the bilateral IFG alters cognitive processes during creative ideation.针对双侧额下回的经颅直流电刺激会在创造性构思过程中改变认知过程。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2024 Dec 4;9(1):75. doi: 10.1038/s41539-024-00285-z.
5
Investigating the neural substrate variations between easy and challenging creative association tasks during product design within an fMRI scanner.在功能磁共振成像扫描仪中研究产品设计过程中简单和具有挑战性的创造性联想任务之间的神经基质变化。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2024 Mar 30;16:550-559. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2024.03.006. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Individual differences and creative ideation: neuromodulatory signatures of mindset and response inhibition.个体差异与创造性思维:思维模式和反应抑制的神经调节特征
Front Neurosci. 2023 Dec 6;17:1238165. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1238165. eCollection 2023.
7
Less might be more: 1 mA but not 1.5 mA of tDCS improves tactile orientation discrimination.少或许就是多:1毫安而非1.5毫安的经颅直流电刺激可改善触觉方向辨别能力。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023 Aug 21;15:186-192. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.08.003. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Comparing transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial random noise stimulation over left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left inferior frontal gyrus: Effects on divergent and convergent thinking.比较经颅直流电刺激和经颅随机噪声刺激对左侧背外侧前额叶皮层和左侧额下回的作用:对发散性思维和聚合性思维的影响。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Nov 3;16:997445. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.997445. eCollection 2022.
9
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Error Rates in the Distractor-Induced Deafness Paradigm.经颅直流电刺激对分心诱导性耳聋范式中错误率的影响。
Brain Sci. 2022 Jun 4;12(6):738. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12060738.
10
Giving Ideas Some Legs or Legs Some Ideas? Children's Motor Creativity Is Enhanced by Physical Activity Enrichment: Direct and Mediated Paths.赋予想法以行动力还是赋予行动以想法?体育活动丰富可增强儿童的运动创造力:直接路径与中介路径
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 10;13:806065. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.806065. eCollection 2022.
创造力、认知与创造性驱力之间的联系,以及潜在的神经机制。
Front Neural Circuits. 2019 Mar 22;13:18. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2019.00018. eCollection 2019.
4
Pimping inhibition: Anodal tDCS enhances stop-signal reaction time.抽动抑制:阳极经颅直流电刺激可延长停止信号反应时间。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Dec;44(12):1933-1945. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000579. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
5
Promoting Creativity Through Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). A Critical Review.通过经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)促进创造力:一项批判性综述。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2018 Aug 2;12:167. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00167. eCollection 2018.
6
Different ways to estimate treatment effects in randomised controlled trials.在随机对照试验中估计治疗效果的不同方法。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2018 Mar 28;10:80-85. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2018.03.008. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) targeting the left inferior frontal gyrus: Effects on creativity across cultures.针对左侧额下回的经颅直流电刺激(tDCS):对不同文化背景下创造力的影响。
Soc Neurosci. 2019 Jun;14(3):277-285. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2018.1464505. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
8
Modulation of inhibitory control by prefrontal anodal tDCS: A crossover double-blind sham-controlled fMRI study.经额部阳极 tDCS 调制的抑制控制:交叉双盲假刺激 fMRI 研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 28;13(3):e0194936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194936. eCollection 2018.
9
TDCS over the right inferior frontal gyrus disrupts control of interference in memory: A retrieval-induced forgetting study.经颅直流电刺激右侧额下回会干扰记忆中的干扰控制:一项提取诱发遗忘研究。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2017 Oct;144:114-130. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
10
Individual Differences and State-Dependent Responses in Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.经颅直流电刺激中的个体差异与状态依赖性反应
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Dec 21;10:643. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00643. eCollection 2016.